Rethinking maps

In this paper we argue that cartography is profitably conceived as a processual, rather than representational, science. Building on recent analysis concerning the philosophical underpinnings of cartography we question the ontological security of maps, contending that it is productive to rethink cartography as ontogenetic in nature; that is maps emerge through practices and have no secure ontological status. Drawing on the concepts of transduction and technicity we contend that maps are of-the-moment, brought into being through practices (embodied, social, technical); that mapping is a process of constant reterritorialization. Maps are never fully formed and their work is never complete. Maps are transitory and fleeting, being contingent, relational and context-dependent; they are always mappings; spatial practices enacted to solve relational problems (eg, how best to create a spatial representation, how to understand a spatial distribution, how to get between A and B, and so on). Such a rethinking, we contend, provides a fresh perspective on cartographic epistemology, and could work to provide a common framework for those who undertake mapping as applied knowledge (asking technical questions) and those that seek to critique such mapping as a form of power/knowledge (asking ideological questions). We illustrate our argument through an analysis of mapping practices.

[1]  J. B. Harley,et al.  DECONSTRUCTING THE MAP , 1989 .

[2]  Robert A. Rundstrom.  Mapping, Postmodernism, Indigenous People And The Changing Direction Of North American Cartography , 1991 .

[3]  M. Monmonier.  How to Lie with Maps , 1991 .

[4]  D. Livingstone.  The Geographical Tradition: Episodes in the History of a Contested Enterprise , 1992 .

[5]  D. Wood.  THE FINE LINE BETWEEN MAPPING AND MAP MAKING , 1993 .

[6]  Matthew H. Edney,et al.  Cartography without ‘Progress’: Reinterpreting the Nature and Historical Development of Mapmaking , 1993 .

[7]  Philip Crang,et al.  It's Showtime: On the Workplace Geographies of Display in a Restaurant in Southeast England , 1994 .

[8]  Alan M. MacEachren,et al.  How Maps Work - Representation, Visualization, and Design , 1995 .

[9]  Karen Ruhleder,et al.  Steps Toward an Ecology of Infrastructure: Design and Access for Large Information Spaces , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[10]  Claire Beesley,et al.  Ground truth: The social implications of geographic information systems , 1996 .

[11]  Andrew Pickering,et al.  The mangle of practice : time, agency, and science , 1997 .

[12]  Louise Locock,et al.  Maps and journeys , 1998 .

[13]  P. Walsh.  The Power of Maps. , 1998 .

[14]  B. Klinkenberg,et al.  Shifting paradigms: from cartographic communication to scientific visualization , 1999 .

[15]  Jeremy W. Crampton,et al.  The Political Mapping of Cyberspace , 2003 .

[16]  C. Perkins.  Cartography: mapping theory , 2003 .

[17]  John Pickles,et al.  A History of Spaces: Cartographic Reason, Mapping and the Geo-Coded World , 2003 .

[18]  Rob Kitchin,et al.  Flying through Code/Space: The Real Virtuality of Air Travel , 2004 .

[19]  D. Livingstone.  Science, Text and Space : thoughts on the geography of reading , 2005 .

[20]  Barry A. T. Brown,et al.  Maps and Journeys: An Ethno-methodological Investigation , 2005, Cartogr. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Geovisualization.

[21]  Rob Kitchin,et al.  Code and the Transduction of Space , 2005 .