Energy and CO2 emission performance in electricity generation: A non-radial directional distance function approach

This paper presents a non-radial directional distance function approach to modeling energy and CO2emission performance in electricity generation from the production efficiency point of view. We first define and construct the environmental production technologies for the countries with and without CHP plants, respectively. The non-radial direction distance function approach is then proposed and several indexes are developed to measure energy and CO2 emission performance of electricity generation. The directional distance functions established can be computed by solving a series of data envelopment analysis models. We then conduct an empirical study using the dataset for over one hundred countries. It is found that OECD countries have better carbon emission performance and integrated energy-carbon performance than non-OECD countries in electricity generation, while the difference in energy performance is not significant.

[1]  Kankana Mukherjee,et al.  Measuring energy efficiency in the context of an emerging economy: The case of indian manufacturing , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Constantin Zopounidis,et al.  Empirical research in the EU banking sector and the financial crisis , 2010 .

[3]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Methodological comparison between two unified (operational and environmental) efficiency measurements for environmental assessment , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[4]  Hongliang Yang,et al.  Incorporating Both Undesirable Outputs and Uncontrollable Variables into Dea: the Performance of Chinese Coal-fired Power Plants Incorporating Both Undesirable Outputs and Uncontrollable Variables into Dea: the Performance of Chinese Coal-fired Power Plants , 2007 .

[5]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Duality of weakly disposable technology , 2011 .

[6]  Aie Energy Efficiency Indicators for Public Electricity Production from Fossil Fuels , 2009 .

[7]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Slacks-based efficiency measures for modeling environmental performance , 2006 .

[8]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Data envelopment analysis for environmental assessment: Comparison between public and private ownership in petroleum industry , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  M. Kortelainen,et al.  Dynamic environmental performance analysis: A Malmquist index approach , 2008 .

[10]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Radial and non-radial decompositions of profit change: With an application to Indian banking , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 1997, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  Peng Zhou,et al.  A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Biresh K. Sahoo,et al.  Radial and non-radial decompositions of Luenberger productivity indicator with an illustrative application , 2011 .

[14]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  How not to measure sustainable value (and how one might) , 2009 .

[15]  José Luis Zofío,et al.  Environmental efficiency and regulatory standards: the case of CO2 emissions from OECD industries , 2001 .

[16]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Data envelopment analysis (DEA) - Thirty years on , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Biresh K. Sahoo,et al.  Alternative measures of environmental technology structure in DEA: An application , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Weighting and Aggregation in Composite Indicator Construction: a Multiplicative Optimization Approach , 2010 .

[19]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Directional distance functions and slacks-based measures of efficiency: Some clarifications , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  Matthew J. Eckelman,et al.  Long-term trends of electric efficiencies in electricity generation in developing countries , 2009 .

[21]  Elizabeth R. Smith,et al.  A directional distance function approach to regional environmental–economic assessments , 2010 .

[22]  Eric W. Welch,et al.  Joint Environmental and Cost Efficiency Analysis of Electricity Generation , 2009 .

[23]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis and Its Uses: With Dea-Solver Software and References , 2005 .

[24]  Peng Zhou,et al.  A non-radial DEA approach to measuring environmental performance , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[25]  Andrés J. Picazo-Tadeo,et al.  Is the environmental performance of industrialized countries converging? A ‘SURE’ approach to testing for convergence , 2008 .

[26]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  A slacks-based measure of super-efficiency in data envelopment analysis , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[27]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation: Comment , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Performance analysis of US coal-fired power plants by measuring three DEA efficiencies , 2010 .

[29]  R. Färe,et al.  Profit, Directional Distance Functions, and Nerlovian Efficiency , 1998 .

[30]  Kazuyuki Sekitani,et al.  DEA congestion and returns to scale under an occurrence of multiple optimal projections , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[31]  Diego Prior,et al.  Environmental externalities and efficiency measurement. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[32]  Rolf Färe,et al.  Directional distance functions and slacks-based measures of efficiency , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[33]  William L. Weber,et al.  A directional slacks-based measure of technical inefficiency , 2009 .

[34]  Rolf Färe,et al.  New directions : efficiency and productivity , 2004 .

[35]  William L. Weber,et al.  A slacks-based inefficiency measure for a two-stage system with bad outputs , 2010 .

[36]  F. Hernández-Sancho,et al.  Directional distance functions and environmental regulation , 2005 .

[37]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Potential for reducing global carbon emissions from electricity production—A benchmarking analysis , 2011 .

[38]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  DEA approach for unified efficiency measurement: Assessment of Japanese fossil fuel power generation , 2011 .

[39]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Measuring environmental performance under different environmental DEA technologies , 2008 .

[40]  S. Managi,et al.  The technical efficiency of the Japanese banks : non-radial directional performance measurement with undesirable output , 2012 .

[41]  Jin-Li Hu,et al.  Total-factor energy productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change: An empirical study of China , 2010 .

[42]  Andrés J. Picazo-Tadeo,et al.  Assessing eco-efficiency with directional distance functions , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[43]  Timo Kuosmanen Weak Disposability in Nonparametric Production Analysis with Undesirable Outputs , 2005 .

[44]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Decomposition of aggregate CO2 emissions: A production-theoretical approach , 2008 .

[45]  R. Färe,et al.  Benefit and Distance Functions , 1996 .

[46]  Sebastián Lozano,et al.  Non-parametric frontier approach to modelling the relationships among population, GDP, energy consumption and CO2 emissions , 2008 .

[47]  Sebastián Lozano,et al.  Slacks-based measure of efficiency of airports with airplanes delays as undesirable outputs , 2011, Comput. Oper. Res..

[48]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Modelling weak disposability in data envelopment analysis under relaxed convexity assumptions , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[49]  C.A.K. Lovell,et al.  Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach , 1989 .

[50]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  Measurement of Returns to Scale and Damages to Scale for DEA-based operational and environmental assessment: How to manage desirable (good) and undesirable (bad) outputs? , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[51]  Ernst Worrell,et al.  Trend in efficiency and capacity of fossil power generation in the EU , 2009 .

[52]  Shunsuke Managi,et al.  Modal choice between air and rail: a social efficiency benchmarking analysis that considers CO2 emissions , 2011 .

[53]  B. W. Ang,et al.  Total factor carbon emission performance: A Malmquist index analysis , 2010 .