Prediction Model for Breeding Hardy Geraniums

Key message. The success of interspecific hybridization in hardy geranium (Geranium sp.) can be predicted by considering the genetic distance between parental genotypes and using the logistic regression model developed in this study. Hardy geranium is a popular ornamental plant known for its architecture, hardiness, prolonged flowering, and diverse colors in leaves and flowers. In ornamental breeding, the pursuit of novel trait combinations is never-ending. Even in Geranium, certain combinations of valuable traits have not yet been achieved. Interspecific hybridization can increase diversity; however, success remains low due to pre- and postzygotic barriers. Crossing success can be predicted by response criteria such as pollen tube growth (tube_length), seed development (seed_dev), and seed setting (seed_set). Within a collection of 42 Geranium genotypes and during two consecutive breeding seasons (years), we evaluated tube_length, seed_dev, and seed_set for 150, 1155, and 349 crosses, respectively. These crosses varied in four parental differences (variables): chromosome number (Chrom), DNA/chromosome (DNA), style length (Style), and genetic distance expressed as the Jaccard distance (cJaccard = 1 − Jaccard). Using logistic regression models has confirmed that most often, the success rate decreased with increasing parental distance. The most consistent association was seen in seed_dev in combination with cJaccard. The model was used to predict the number of crosses necessary to have 10 successful crossing products by taking into account the uncertainty in the model. These findings provide valuable guidance for future planning of interspecific breeding experiments in Geranium. By incorporating the genetic distance between parental genotypes, breeders can enhance the efficiency and success of hybridization efforts.

[1]  A. Giancaspro,et al.  Optimization of an In Vitro Embryo Rescue Protocol for Breeding Seedless Table Grapes (Vitis vinifera L.) in Italy , 2022, Horticulturae.

[2]  D. Reheul,et al.  Overcoming Pre-Fertilization Barriers in Intertribal Crosses between Anemone coronaria L. and Ranunculus asiaticus L. , 2021, Horticulturae.

[3]  P. Thomas,et al.  Development and Verification of an Interspecific Hybridization Protocol for Asclepias , 2021, HortScience.

[4]  Sandeep Kumar,et al.  Back-cross introgression of ‘Tour’ cytoplasm from Brassica napus through in vitro embryo rescue reveals partial restoration of sterility in B. oleracea , 2021 .

[5]  J. Ruter,et al.  Pavonia ×rufula (Malvaceae): An Interspecific Hybrid between Pavonia lasiopetala and Pavonia missionum , 2021, HortScience.

[6]  S. Werbrouck,et al.  Can Knowledge of Genetic Distances, Genome Sizes and Chromosome Numbers Support Breeding Programs in Hardy Geraniums? , 2021, Genes.

[7]  F. Finger,et al.  Evaluation of production and quality traits in interspecific hybrids of ornamental pepper , 2019, Horticultura Brasileira.

[8]  Anna Gambin,et al.  Jaccard/Tanimoto similarity test and estimation methods for biological presence-absence data , 2019, BMC Bioinformatics.

[9]  Meihua Deng,et al.  Identification and Control of Common Weeds: Volume 2 , 2017, Springer Netherlands.

[10]  L. Leus,et al.  Interspecific hybridization in Sarcococca supported by analysis of ploidy level, genome size and genetic relationships , 2017, Euphytica.

[11]  Katrine N. Bjerkan,et al.  Endosperm-based hybridization barriers explain the pattern of gene flow between Arabidopsis lyrata and Arabidopsis arenosa in Central Europe , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  T. Dresselhaus,et al.  Male-female crosstalk during pollen germination, tube growth and guidance, and double fertilization. , 2013, Molecular plant.

[13]  S. Wanke,et al.  Facilitating wide hybridization in Hydrangea s. l. cultivars: A phylogenetic and marker-assisted breeding approach , 2013, Molecular Breeding.

[14]  A. Shieh,et al.  Callose plug deposition patterns vary in pollen tubes of Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes and tomato species , 2012, BMC Plant Biology.

[15]  William N. Venables,et al.  Modern Applied Statistics with S , 2010 .

[16]  Ole Seehausen,et al.  Genetic Distance between Species Predicts Novel Trait Expression in their Hybrids , 2009, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[17]  A. Allen,et al.  Diverse cell signalling pathways regulate pollen-stigma interactions: the search for consensus. , 2008, The New phytologist.

[18]  A. Geitmann,et al.  More Than a Leak Sealant. The Mechanical Properties of Callose in Pollen Tubes1 , 2005, Plant Physiology.

[19]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 2002, Technometrics.

[20]  C. Aedo Taxonomic Revision of Geranium sect. Brasiliensia (Geraniaceae) , 2001 .

[21]  Y. Heslop-Harrison Control Gates and Micro-ecology: The Pollen–Stigma Interaction in Perspective , 2000 .

[22]  D. Grier,et al.  Pollen-stigma adhesion in Arabidopsis: a species-specific interaction mediated by lipophilic molecules in the pollen exine. , 1999, Development.

[23]  J. Renou,et al.  Interspecific crosses between Pelargonium x hortorum and P. quinquelobatum using embryo rescue and molecular characterization of hybrids by an endogenous chs probe , 1997 .

[24]  A. Snow,et al.  Differential pollen-tube growth rates and nonrandom fertilization in Hibiscus moscheutos (Malvaceae) , 1991 .

[25]  M. Hessing Differential Pollen Tube Success in Geranium caespitosum , 1989, Botanical Gazette.

[26]  C. Dumas,et al.  Callose and determination of pistil viability and incompatibility , 1983, Theoretical and Applied Genetics.

[27]  J. Stewart,et al.  In vitro fertilization and embryo rescue , 1981 .

[28]  F. D. Boesewinkel,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF OVULE AND TESTA OF GERANIUM PRATENSE L. AND SOME OTHER REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GERANIACEAE , 1979 .

[29]  K. Shivanna,et al.  The receptive surface of the angiosperm stigma , 1977 .

[30]  J. Tupý Callose formation in pollen tubes and incompatibility , 1959, Biologia Plantarum.

[31]  Plaschil Spontaneous polyploidisation of interspecific and intersectional Pelargonium hybrids during embryo rescue , 2021 .

[32]  J. Huylenbroeck Ornamental Crops , 2018, Handbook of Plant Breeding.

[33]  E. Yeung,et al.  Plant Embryo Culture , 2011, Methods in Molecular Biology.

[34]  G. Cai,et al.  Functional interactions among cytoskeleton, membranes, and cell wall in the pollen tube of flowering plants. , 1997, International review of cytology.

[35]  A. Blakeslee Removing some of the barriers to crossability in plants. , 1945, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society.