论文信息 - Discussion: How Eurocode 7 has affected geotechnical design: a review

Discussion: How Eurocode 7 has affected geotechnical design: a review

Contribution by P. J. Vardanega The discusser read the author’s paper with great interest, and acknowledges his contributions to the Eurocode 7 development process and the associated academic commentary (e.g. Orr, 2000, 2012a, 2012b). The paper is an excellent summary of the present state of Eurocode development. The Eurocodes cannot be allowed to ossify. In this spirit there are a few points from the paper worthy of discussion with regard to future code development.

Trevor L. L. Orr | Paul J Vardanega

[1] Spg Madabhushi,et al. Laboratory measurement of strength mobilisation in kaolin: link to stress history , 2012 .

[2] Trevor L. L. Orr. Implementing Eurocode 7 to achieve reliable geotechnical designs , 2013 .

[3] Trevor L. L. Orr,et al. How Eurocode 7 has affected geotechnical design: a review , 2012 .

[4] Malcolm D. Bolton,et al. Strength mobilization in clays and silts , 2011 .

[5] Paul J Vardanega,et al. Bored pile design in stiff clay I: Codes of practice , 2012 .

[6] Trevor L. L. Orr,et al. Selection of characteristic values and partial factors in geotechnical designs to Eurocode 7 , 2000 .

[7] Malcolm D. Bolton,et al. Bored pile design in stiff clay II: mechanisms and uncertainty , 2012 .