Standardized Criteria for Identification of Cardiac Tamponade on Non–Electrocardiogram-gated Computed Tomography

Purpose: To identify imaging parameters that can help in the diagnosis of cardiac tamponade on non–electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated computed tomography (CT) of the chest. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of 64 patients who had undergone CT and echocardiography for evaluation of cardiac tamponade. Of 64 patients, 34 were diagnosed with tamponade and underwent pericardiocentesis for further diagnosis and treatment. CT measurements obtained were: pericardial effusion (PeEff) pocket size in 6 locations (anterior, posterior, superior, inferior, right, and left lateral), pericardial thickening, diameters of the coronary sinus, upper superior vena cava, lower superior vena cava, and inferior vena cava. In addition, cardiac chamber sizes were measured. Subjective assessment of coronary sinus compression, pericardial enhancement, and pericardial thickening were also recorded. Results: Measurement of the sum of the right lateral and left lateral PeEff thickness resulted in 91.2% sensitivity and 86.7% specificity for cardiac tamponade with a threshold of 30 mm (receiver-operating characteristic area under the curve=0.94 [0.84 to 0.98], P<0.0001). Using the combination of inferior PeEff >16 mm, sum of right lateral and left lateral PeEff>30 mm, and presence of pericardial thickening resulted in 56% sensitivity and 100% specificity and positive predictive value for the determination of cardiac tamponade. Conclusions: Our study suggests that CT measurements related to PeEff size and thickness aid in the diagnosis of cardiac tamponade.

[1]  Rana H. Bachir,et al.  Effectiveness and outcomes of 2 therapeutic interventions for cardiac tamponade , 2020, Medicine.

[2]  T. Baran,et al.  Accuracy of Non-Electrocardiographically Gated Thoracic CT Angiography for Right Atrial and Right Ventricular Enlargement. , 2019, Radiology. Cardiothoracic imaging.

[3]  M. Çetin,et al.  Clinical characteristics and prognosis of cardiac tamponade patients: 5‑year experience at a tertiary center , 2018, Herz.

[4]  P. Thavendiranathan,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Sex-Specific Chest CT Measurements Compared With Cardiac MRI Findings in the Assessment of Cardiac Chamber Enlargement. , 2018, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[5]  D. Vargas,et al.  CT for evaluation of acute pericardial emergencies in the ED , 2018, Emergency Radiology.

[6]  E. Hess,et al.  Increased Computed Tomography Utilization in the Emergency Department and Its Association with Hospital Admission , 2017, The western journal of emergency medicine.

[7]  K. Kaproth-Joslin,et al.  Every second counts: signs of a failing heart on thoracic CT in the ED , 2017, Emergency Radiology.

[8]  G. Hong,et al.  Incidence, Predictors, and Clinical Outcomes of Postoperative Cardiac Tamponade in Patients Undergoing Heart Valve Surgery , 2016, PloS one.

[9]  R. Hsia,et al.  A National Study of the Prevalence of Life-Threatening Diagnoses in Patients With Chest Pain. , 2016, JAMA internal medicine.

[10]  T. Ogawa,et al.  The evaluation of cardiac tamponade risk in patients with pericardial effusion detected by non-gated chest CT , 2016, Acta radiologica.

[11]  G. Gentile,et al.  The role of early contrast-enhanced chest computed tomography in the aetiological diagnosis of patients presenting with cardiac tamponade or large pericardial effusion. , 2016, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[12]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  2015 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases , 2015, European heart journal.

[13]  Y. Pinto,et al.  Triage strategy for urgent management of cardiac tamponade: a position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. , 2014, European heart journal.

[14]  J. Bogaert,et al.  Pericardial disease: value of CT and MR imaging. , 2013, Radiology.

[15]  P. Rajiah.  Cardiac MRI: Part 2, pericardial diseases. , 2011, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  Y. Adler,et al.  Triage and management of pericardial effusion , 2010, Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine.

[17]  L. McCaig,et al.  Emergency department visits for chest pain and abdominal pain: United States, 1999-2008. , 2010, NCHS data brief.

[18]  E. Halpern,et al.  Triple-rule-out CT angiography for evaluation of acute chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome. , 2009, Radiology.

[19]  A. Gamst,et al.  Evaluation of the Coronary Sinus on Chest Computed Tomography in Patients With and Without Pulmonary Artery Hypertension , 2009, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[20]  Mythreyi Bhargavan,et al.  The effect of teleradiology on time to interpretation for CT pulmonary angiographic studies. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[21]  V. Jain,et al.  Coronary Sinus Compression: An Early Computed Tomographic Sign of Cardiac Tamponade , 2008, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[22]  J. Klein,et al.  Imaging findings in cardiac tamponade with emphasis on CT. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[23]  Benjamin M Yeh,et al.  CT and MR imaging of pericardial disease. , 2003, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[24]  J. Breen.  Imaging of the Pericardium , 2001, Journal of thoracic imaging.

[25]  M. Sheppard,et al.  The coronary sinus conduit function: anatomical study (relationship to adjacent structures). , 2005, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[26]  J. R. Ortale,et al.  The anatomy of the coronary sinus and its tributaries , 2001, Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy.