Upward influence tactics through technology-mediated communication tools

The globalization of work within organizations has generated a greater need for all types of workers to exert interpersonal influence through technology-mediated communication tools. This paper sheds light on the interpersonal relations process in virtual environments from the specific perspective of the choice of upward influence (UI) tactics. We suggest that virtual work settings may impact the UI tactic selected, as well as the communication medium used to enact it. In particular, we study whether the types of UI strategies found in physical environments are relevant in virtual work contexts. This research also analyzes the UI process in virtual work settings, as well as the role of communication media in that process. Results based on the qualitative analysis of the content of 14 interviews suggest that there is an influence tactic specific to virtual work relations. That tactic might be called intermediation and consists of finding an intermediary who is well connected to the target and can help define the best approach for the agent. In addition, workers often split their influence attempts into a two-step strategy in order to achieve better results, taking advantage of the capabilities of the media available for that purpose.

[1]  Daniel J. Brass.  Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. , 1984 .

[2]  Efrat Elron,et al.  Influence and Political Processes in Cyberspace , 2006 .

[3]  Isabel C. Botero,et al.  Exploring Differences and Similarities in Predictors and Use of Upward Influence Strategies in Two Countries , 2012 .

[4]  Marshall W. Meyer,et al.  Power in Organizations. , 1982 .

[5]  Gerald R. Ferris,et al.  Influence tactics and work outcomes: a meta‐analysis , 2003 .

[6]  E. A. Locke,et al.  A study of upward influence in organizations. , 1982 .

[7]  Mei Lu,et al.  How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[8]  Lyman W. Porter,et al.  Organizational Influence Processes , 2002 .

[9]  Ronald J. Deluga,et al.  The relationship of subordinate upward influencing behaviour, satisfaction and perceived superior effectiveness with leader—member exchanges , 1991 .

[10]  A. Kaul.  Talking Up: Study of Upward Influence Strategies , 2003 .

[11]  Anit Somech,et al.  Relative power and influence strategy: the effects of agent/target organizational power on superiors' choices of influence strategies , 2002 .

[12]  G. Yukl,et al.  Consequences of Influence Tactics Used With Subordinates, Peers, and the Boss , 1992 .

[13]  Ann-Marie Rizzo,et al.  Making Things Happen in Organizations: Does Gender Make a Difference? , 1988 .

[14]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[15]  John Short,et al.  The social psychology of telecommunications , 1976 .

[16]  Chester A. Schriesheim,et al.  Influence tactics used by subordinates: A theoretical and empirical analysis and refinement of the Kipnis, Schmidt, and Wilkinson subscales. , 1990 .

[17]  Wayne F. Cascio,et al.  E-Leadership and Virtual Teams , 2008, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[18]  Pep Simo,et al.  The frequency of the dyadic influence tactics according to communication media , 2012, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[19]  C. Cramton.  The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[20]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Message Equivocality, Media Selection, and Manager Performance: Implications for Information Systems , 1987, MIS Q..

[21]  B. Barry,et al.  The Medium and the Message: The Adaptive Use of Communication Media in Dyadic Influence , 2004 .

[22]  T. S. Bateman,et al.  Perceptions of Influence in Managerial Dyads: The Role of Hierarchy, Media, and Tactics , 1992 .

[23]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Understanding the use of Group Decision Support Systems: The Theory of Adaptive Structuration , 1990 .

[24]  Stuart M. Schmidt,et al.  Upward-influence styles: Relationship with performance evaluations, salary, and stress. , 1988 .

[25]  Julie O’Neil.  Effects of Gender and Power on PR Managers' Upward Influence , 2004 .

[26]  Raymond T. Sparrowe,et al.  Do Leaders' Influence Tactics Relate to Members' Helping Behavior? IT Depends on the Quality of the Relationship , 2006 .

[27]  Why managers prefer some influence tactics to other tactics: A net utility explanation , 2007 .

[28]  D. Ralston,et al.  Moving Toward a Global Understanding of Upward Influence Strategies: An Asian Perspective with Directions for Cross-Cultural Research , 2002 .

[29]  Jan Schilling.  On the Pragmatics of Qualitative Assessment Designing the Process for Content Analysis , 2006 .

[30]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[31]  Robert P. Vecchio,et al.  Choice of influence tactics: Individual and organizational determinants , 1991 .

[32]  Carolyn I. Chavez,et al.  Validation of the extended Influence Behavior Questionnaire , 2008 .

[33]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Qualitative Analysis of Content by , 2005 .

[34]  J. Barbuto,et al.  Dispositional Effects in Intra-Organizational Influence Tactics: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2006 .

[35]  Jan Schilling.  On the Pragmatics of Qualitative Assessment , 2006 .

[36]  Daniel M. Cable,et al.  Managers' upward influence tactic strategies: the role of manager personality and supervisor leadership style , 2003 .

[37]  Likoebe M. Maruping,et al.  Managing team interpersonal processes through technology: a task-technology fit perspective. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[38]  D. Cable,et al.  Employee resistance to organizational change: managerial influence tactics and leader-member exchange. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[39]  Venkat R. Krishnan,et al.  Impact of transformational leadership on followers’ influence strategies , 2004 .

[40]  Cecilia M. Falbe,et al.  Antecedents of influence outcomes , 1996 .

[41]  V. Vroom.  Work and motivation , 1964 .

[42]  Merideth Ferguson.  The Role of Group Membership Perception and Team Identity in a Virtual Team's Use of Influence Tactics , 2004 .

[43]  Carolyn I. Chavez,et al.  Assessing the construct validity and utility of two new influence tactics , 2005 .

[44]  Allison W. Pearson,et al.  The Cross-Cultural Evolution of the Subordinate Influence Ethics Measure , 2010 .

[45]  Helvi Kyngäs,et al.  The qualitative content analysis process. , 2008, Journal of advanced nursing.

[46]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication , 1986 .

[47]  N. Cho,et al.  Effects of the Upward Influence Strategies on the Communication Media Selection , 2008 .

[48]  R. Bostrom,et al.  Evolution of group performance over time: A repeated measures study of GDSS effects , 1993 .

[49]  B. V. Knippenberg,et al.  Future interaction expectation and the use of soft and hard influence tactics , 2003 .

[50]  Cecilia M. Falbe,et al.  Influence tactics and objectives in upward, downward, and lateral influence attempts. , 1990 .

[51]  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh,et al.  Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis , 2005, Qualitative health research.

[52]  Randy Hirokawa,et al.  A comparison of influence strategies utilized by managers in American and Japanese organizations , 1986 .

[53]  Steven M. Farmer,et al.  Failed Upward Influence Attempts , 1996 .

[54]  A. Kaul.  Gender, Affect and Upward Influence: An Indian Study , 2006 .

[55]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  Review of: Jamblin, F.M. and Putnam, L.L. eds. The new handbook of organizational communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: , Sage, 2001 , 2005, Inf. Res..

[56]  J. Walther.  Relational Aspects of Computer-Mediated Communication: Experimental Observations over Time , 1995 .

[57]  Renate E. Meyer,et al.  Contextualizing Influence Activities: An Objective Hermeneutical Approach , 2005 .

[58]  Laura J. Damschroder,et al.  Qualitative Content Analysis , 2007 .

[59]  Steven M. Farmer,et al.  Putting upward influence strategies in context , 1997 .

[60]  Gerald R. Ferris,et al.  Subordinate Influence and the Performance Evaluation Process: Test of a Model , 1994 .

[61]  Rebecca A. Thacker,et al.  An Examination of the Relationship Between Upward Influence Tactics and Assessments of Promotability , 1995 .

[62]  E. Vance Wilson,et al.  Perceived effectiveness of interpersonal persuasion strategies in computer-mediated communication , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[63]  Cecilia M. Falbe,et al.  CONSEQUENCES FOR MANAGERS OF USING SINGLE INFLUENCE TACTICS AND COMBINATIONS OF TACTICS , 1992 .

[64]  D. Kipnis,et al.  Intraorganizational Influence Tactics: Explorations in Getting One's Way , 1980 .

[65]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Media, Tasks, and Communication Processes: A Theory of Media Synchronicity , 2008, MIS Q..