A comparative study of boar semen extenders with different proposed preservation times and their effect on semen quality and fertility

The present study compared the quality characteristics of boar semen diluted with three extenders of different proposed preservation times (short-term, medium-term and long-term). A part of extended semen was used for artificial insemination on the farm (30 sows/extender), while the remaining part was stored for three days (16–18 °C). Stored and used semen was also laboratory assessed at insemination time, on days 1 and 2 after the collection (day 0). The long-term extender was used for a short time, within 2 days from semen collection, with the aim to investigate a possible advantage over the others regarding laboratory or farm fertility indicators at the beginning of the preservation time. Viability, motility, kinetic indicators, morphology and DNA fragmentation were estimated. The results showed reduced viability, higher values for most of the kinetics, and higher immotile spermatozoa from day 1 to day 2 in all extenders; however, the long-term extender was superior compared to the other two on both days. With regard to morphology and chromatin integrity, the percentage of abnormal and fragmented spermatozoa increased on day 2 compared to day 1 for all of the extenders. However, based on the farrowing rate and the number of piglets born alive after the application of conventional artificial insemination within 2 days from semen collection/dilution, it was found that the medium-term diluents were more effective. In conclusion, it seems that the in vivo fertilization process involves more factors than simply the quality of laboratory evaluated sperm indicators, warranting further research. DNA fragmentation, ejaculate, in vitro quality, in vivo fertility, semen analysis, semen storage

[1]  M. Rozkot,et al.  Effects of long-term liquid commercial semen extender and storage time on the membrane quality of boar semen , 2018 .

[2]  M. Manafi Artificial Insemination in Farm Animals , 2014 .

[3]  Maes Dominiek,et al.  Artificial Insemination in Pigs , 2011 .

[4]  K. Kaeoket,et al.  The Effect of Using Long Term and Short Term Extenders during Cooling Process on the Quality of Frozen Boar Semen , 2011 .

[5]  S. Manee-in,et al.  Comparative Study on Six Different Long Term Commercial Extenders for Fresh Boar Semen , 2010 .

[6]  T. Khalifa,et al.  Relationship between sperm quality traits and field-fertility of porcine semen , 2010, Journal of veterinary science.

[7]  W. Dixon,et al.  Identifying useable semen. , 2008, Theriogenology.

[8]  A. D. Kruif,et al.  Detailed motility evaluation of boar semen and its predictive value for reproductive performance in sows Voorspellende waarde van spermabeweeglijkheid bij de beer voor de reproductieresultaten bij zeugen , 2008 .

[9]  M. Estienne,et al.  Characteristics of sperm motility in boar semen diluted in different extenders and stored for seven days at 18 degrees C. , 2007, Reproductive biology.

[10]  Y. Gröhn,et al.  Fertility results of artificial inseminations performed with liquid boar semen stored in X-cell vs BTS extender. , 2007, Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene.

[11]  J. Gosálvez,et al.  Sperm DNA fragmentation in boars is delayed or abolished by using sperm extenders. , 2006, Theriogenology.

[12]  H. Rodríguez-Martínez,et al.  Effect of storage in short--and long-term commercial semen extenders on the motility, plasma membrane and chromatin integrity of boar spermatozoa. , 2006, International journal of andrology.

[13]  A. Pacey,et al.  Sperm transport in the female reproductive tract. , 2006, Human reproduction update.

[14]  A. Ersbøll,et al.  Increasing storage time of extended boar semen reduces sperm DNA integrity. , 2005, Theriogenology.

[15]  H. Rodríguez-Martínez,et al.  Boar spermatozoa in the oviduct. , 2005, Theriogenology.

[16]  B. Kemp,et al.  Uterine activity, sperm transport, and the role of boar stimuli around insemination in sows. , 2005, Theriogenology.

[17]  J. Gadea,et al.  The predictive value of porcine seminal parameters on fertility outcome under commercial conditions. , 2004, Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene.

[18]  A. Van Soom,et al.  Comparative study on five different commercial extenders for boar semen. , 2004, Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene.

[19]  Leyland Fraser,et al.  The use of comet assay to assess DNA integrity of boar spermatozoa following liquid preservation at 5 degrees C and 16 degrees C. , 2004, Folia histochemica et cytobiologica.

[20]  Leyland Fraser,et al.  The use of comet assay to assess DNA integrity of boar spermatozoa following liquid preservation at 5˚C and 16˚C , 2004 .

[21]  J. Gadea Review: semen extenders used in the artificial inseminarion of swine , 2003 .

[22]  S. Rodriguez-Zas,et al.  Effect of boar exposure at time of insemination on factors influencing fertility in gilts. , 2003, Journal of animal science.

[23]  E. Kommisrud,et al.  Influence of Boar and Semen Parameters on Motility and Acrosome Integrity in Liquid Boar Semen Stored for Five Days , 2002, Acta veterinaria Scandinavica.

[24]  J. Bailey,et al.  The importance of porcine sperm parameters on fertility in vivo. , 1999, Theriogenology.

[25]  C. Kuster,et al.  The fecundity of porcine semen stored for 2 to 6 days in Androhep and X-CELL extenders. , 1999, Theriogenology.

[26]  J. Mitchell,et al.  A test for the practical evaluation of male fertility by acridine orange (AO) fluorescence. , 1984, Fertility and sterility.

[27]  A. Walton The Artificial Insemination of Farm Animals , 1948, Nature.