An investigation of the UK micro- and nano- technology government intervention

This study investigates a recent UK Government Intervention established to develop Micro- and Nano- Technologies (MNTs) for technology-based economic growth. While the need for such innovation policies is well recognised, there is also a need to understand the key challenges to developing effective policy interventions for the innovation process that will create sound economic leverage (Harvey, 2010). A new method that helps us understand the innovation process at the organisational level has been developed, by working across disciplines and synthesising different methodologies. Constructs adopted from the Minnesota Innovation Research Programme (MIRP) were used to gather and analyse data. The methodological approach followed was a fusion of the Interactive Process Perspective (IPP) and Institutional Theory (IT). This method has been used to further explain the complexities of the innovation process by demonstrating the co-operation and contestation between actors from different interest groups in terms of agency and structure. Evidence of how innovation centres exhibit different characteristics relating to their local context along with the specific actors populating them is provided. Those actors bring their own institutional logics, belief systems and associated practices to their centres. The importance which the local context of an MNT Centre has within the extra-local context of the state intervention is shown to have a major bearing on its original purpose. For practitioners some important points have been raised: the intended purpose of the MNT government intervention was shown to evolve across MNT centres; the key influential actors of each centre demonstrably followed different institutional systems of reasoning, which in some cases resulted in internal conflicts. As demonstrated in this study, the ingrained institutional thinking and reasoning of actors can be difficult to change for the intended purpose of an intervention, once funding has already been awarded.

[1]  Naubahar Sharif,et al.  Emergence and development of the National Innovation Systems concept , 2006 .

[2]  Rebecca Henderson The Innovator's Dilemma as a Problem of Organizational Competence , 2006 .

[3]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  An Overview of Innovation , 2009 .

[4]  Jon Olson,et al.  Cultural orientations and individual reactions to organizations: A study of employees of Japanese-owned firms. , 1981 .

[5]  Constantinos C. Markides,et al.  Fast Second: How Smart Companies Bypass Radical Innovation to Enter and Dominate New Markets , 2005 .

[6]  Paul DiMaggio Interest and Agency in Institutional Theory , 1988 .

[7]  J. Fagerberg Innovation: A Guide to the Literature , 2003 .

[8]  A. Bartzokas Policy Relevance and Theory Development in Innovation Studies , 2001 .

[9]  Magnus Klofsten,et al.  Technology, Innovation and Enterprise , 1997 .

[10]  M. Callon Techno-economic Networks and Irreversibility , 1990 .

[11]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  M. Dodgson,et al.  Think, Play, Do: Technology, Innovation, and Organization , 2005 .

[13]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  University Technology Transfer and National Systems of Innovation: Introduction to the Special Issue of Industry and Innovation , 2006 .

[14]  Erwin Danneels Dialogue on the Effects of Disruptive Technology on Firms and Industries , 2006 .

[15]  Steven Casper,et al.  Institutional Adaptiveness, Technology Policy, and the Diffusion of New Business Models: The Case of German Biotechnology , 2000 .

[16]  Donald R. Cooper,et al.  Business Research Methods , 1980 .

[17]  Petter Holm The Dynamics of Institutionalization: Transformation Processes in Norwegian Fisheries , 1995 .

[18]  M. Mizruchi,et al.  The Social Construction of Organizational Knowledge: A Study of the Uses of Coercive, Mimetic, and Normative Isomorphism , 1999 .

[19]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutions and Organizations. , 1995 .

[20]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[21]  Meric S. Gertler,et al.  The Geography of Innovation: Regional Innovation Systems , 2006 .

[22]  F. Malerba Sectoral systems of innovation: a framework for linking innovation to the knowledge base, structure and dynamics of sectors , 2005 .

[23]  Nigel F. Piercy,et al.  The innovation challenges of proactive cannibalisation and discontinuous technology , 2002 .

[24]  Cameron Lawrence,et al.  Institutions and Organizations (2nd ed.) , 2003 .

[25]  Daniele Archibugi,et al.  Technology, globalisation and economic performance , 1997 .

[26]  Charles J. Fombrun,et al.  CONVERGENT DYNAMICS IN THE PRODUCTION OF ORGANIZATIONAL CONFIGURATIONS , 1989 .

[27]  Patricia H. Thornton,et al.  Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations: Executive Succession in the Higher Education Publishing Industry, 1958– 19901 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[28]  C. Freeman Continental, national and sub-national innovation systems--complementarity and economic growth , 2002 .

[29]  Craig M. Gurney Lowering the Drawbridge: A Case Study of Analogy and Metaphor in the Social Construction of Home-ownership , 1999 .

[30]  D. Campbell Variation and Selective retention in Socio-Cultural Evolution , 1965 .

[31]  Timothy James Edwards,et al.  Organizational politics and the "process of knowing": Understanding crisis events during project-based innovation projects , 2007 .

[32]  Fred Steward,et al.  Managing and Shaping Innovation , 2009 .

[33]  Bart Clarysse,et al.  Nurturing and Growing Innovative Start-Ups: The Role of Policy as Integrator , 2007 .

[34]  Soren M. Kaplan,et al.  Discontinuous innovation and the growth paradox , 1999 .

[35]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change , 1990 .

[36]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Seeing What's Next: Using the Theories of Innovation to Predict Industry Change , 2005 .

[37]  B. Latour Science in Action , 1987 .

[38]  David Charles,et al.  Universities as key knowledge infrastructures in regional innovation systems , 2006 .

[39]  M. Feldman The New Economics Of Innovation, Spillovers And Agglomeration: Areview Of Empirical Studies , 1999 .

[40]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[41]  Sumantra Ghoshal,et al.  Environmental Scanning in Korean Firms: Organizational Isomorphism in Action , 1988 .

[42]  Stephen A. W. Drew,et al.  Building technology foresight: using scenarios to embrace innovation , 2006 .

[43]  Barrie R. Nault,et al.  Eating Your Own Lunch: Protection through Preemption , 1995 .

[44]  Rafesh Koshy Chandy Organizing for Radical Product Innovation , 1998 .

[45]  Martin Benkenstein,et al.  Models of Technological Evolution: Their Impact on Technology Management , 1993 .

[46]  Aldo Geuna,et al.  The Role of University Spinout Companies in an Emerging Technology: The Case of Nanotechnology , 2006 .

[47]  Eva Boxenbaum,et al.  Isomorphism, Diffusion and Decoupling , 2008 .

[48]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  The Oxford handbook of innovation , 2006 .

[49]  Martina Fromhold-Eisebith,et al.  Bridging Scales in Innovation Policies: How to Link Regional, National and International Innovation Systems , 2007 .

[50]  David Birchall,et al.  Capabilities for Strategic Advantage: Leading Through Technological Innovation , 2005 .

[51]  W. Powell Expanding the Scope of Institutional Analysis , 1991 .

[52]  J. Schumpeter Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[53]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[54]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[55]  Timothy James Edwards Techno-economic networks: technological transfer via the teaching company scheme , 2001 .

[56]  John W. Meyer Reflections on Institutional Theories of Organizations , 2007 .

[57]  D. Mowery,et al.  Inside the black box: The influence of market demand upon innovation: a critical review of some recent empirical studies , 1993 .

[58]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Architectural Innovation: The Reconfiguration of Existing Product Technologies and the Failure of , 1990 .

[59]  Valerij Fajziev The Group , 2021, Where Misfits Fit.

[60]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[61]  E. Stotland,et al.  Social psychology : a cognitive approach , 1972 .

[62]  Bo Carlsson,et al.  Technological systems and economic performance : the case of factory automation , 1995 .

[63]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  CUSTOMER POWER, STRATEGIC INVESTMENT, AND THE FAILURE OF LEADING FIRMS , 1996 .

[64]  T. P. Hughes Networks of power : electrification in Western society, 1880-1930 , 1984 .

[65]  G. Smith,et al.  Medicines for the year 2000 , 1979 .

[66]  K. Debackere,et al.  Adaptation in new technology-based ventures: Insights at the company level , 2006 .

[67]  Robert Jackall,et al.  Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers , 1988 .

[68]  Robert Kaiser,et al.  Managing diversity in a system of multi-level governance: the open method of co-ordination in innovation policy , 2004 .

[69]  Bruce Tether,et al.  Sectoral Systems of Innovation: Services and systems of innovation , 2004 .

[70]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Disruptive Technologies: Catching the Wave , 1995 .

[71]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Theorizing Change: The Role of Professional Associations in the Transformation of Institutionalized Fields , 2002 .

[72]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[73]  J. Morse Styles of Collaboration in Qualitative Inquiry , 2008, Qualitative health research.

[74]  R. V. Wyk Innovation: The attacker's advantage : Richard N. Foster 316 pages, £14.95 (London, Macmillan, 1986) , 1987 .

[75]  Rolf Sternberg,et al.  Do Manufacturing Firms Profit from Intraregional Innovation Linkages? An Empirical Based Answer , 2000 .

[76]  Employment,et al.  Opportunity for all in a world of change , 2001 .

[77]  T. J. Edwards Collaborative alliances and organisational innovation : a study of the innovation process , 2001 .

[78]  Sue Birley,et al.  New ventures and employment growth , 1987 .

[79]  Timothy James Edwards,et al.  Innovation and Organizational Change: Developments Towards an Interactive Process Perspective , 2000 .

[80]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Innovation At and Across Multiple Levels of Analysis , 2007, Organ. Sci..

[81]  A. Sayer,et al.  Realism and Social Science , 1999 .

[82]  H. Tajfel,et al.  An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. , 1979 .

[83]  F. Malerba Sectoral systems of innovation and production , 2002 .

[84]  John A. Mathews,et al.  National systems of economic learning: the case of technology diffusion management in East Asia , 2001, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[85]  R. Friedland Bringing Society Back In : Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions , 1991 .

[86]  Alexander Schwery,et al.  Supporting the Technology-Push of a Discontinuous Innovation in Practice , 2004 .

[87]  J. Hassard,et al.  Actor Network Theory and After , 1999 .

[88]  M. Ventresca,et al.  Inhabited Institutions: Social Interactions and Organizational Forms in Gouldner’s Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy , 2006 .

[89]  E. Mansfield Industrial research and technological innovation , 1968 .

[90]  T. Reay,et al.  The Recomposition of an Organizational Field: Health Care in Alberta , 2005 .

[91]  Patricia H. Thornton The Rise of the Corporation in a Craft Industry: Conflict and Conformity in Institutional Logics , 2002 .

[92]  J. Law A Sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination , 1991 .

[93]  M. Tushman,et al.  Readings in the Management of Innovation , 1988 .

[94]  Alan Pilkington,et al.  Gales of creative destruction and the opportunistic incumbent: The case of electric vehicles in California , 2005, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[95]  P. M. Hughes,et al.  What Makes a Revolution? Disruptive Technology and Social Change , 2001 .

[96]  V. Govindarajan,et al.  The Usefulness of Measuring Disruptiveness of Innovations Ex Post in Making Ex Ante Predictions* , 2006 .

[97]  Erwin Danneels The dynamics of product innovation and firm competences , 2002 .

[98]  John M Taylor,et al.  New Dimensions for Manufacturing: A UK Strategy for Nanotechnology , 2002 .

[99]  Jeong-Dong Lee,et al.  Research and development linkages in a national innovation system: Factors affecting success and failure in Korea , 2006 .

[100]  T. Skocpol,et al.  The Dead End of Matatheory@@@Powers of Theory: Capitalism, the State, and Democracy. , 1985 .

[101]  R. N. Foster Managing Technological Innovation for the Next 25 Years , 2000 .

[102]  Clayton M. Christensen The Ongoing Process of Building a Theory of Disruption , 2006 .

[103]  R. Normann,et al.  Organizational Innovativeness: Product Variation and Reorientation , 1971 .

[104]  David Jacobson,et al.  Innovation - the case for multi-level research , 1997 .

[105]  D. Silverman Interpreting Qualitative Data: Methods for Analysing Talk, Text and Interaction , 1994 .

[106]  A. Gouldner Patterns Of Industrial Bureaucracy , 1954 .

[107]  B. Lundvall National Systems of Innovation , 1992 .

[108]  Oswald Jones,et al.  Technology Management in a Mature Firm: Structuration Theory and the Innovation Process , 2000 .

[109]  R. Bhaskar,et al.  Critical Realism , 2011 .

[110]  Fred Steward,et al.  Social Interaction and Organisational Change: Aston Perspectives on Innovation Networks , 2001 .

[111]  Luke Georghiou,et al.  Issues in the Evaluation of Innovation and Technology Policy , 1998 .

[112]  L. Collins Efficient and effective , 2004 .

[113]  S. Hung,et al.  Stimulating new industries from emerging technologies: challenges for the public sector , 2006 .

[114]  S. Kozlowski,et al.  From Micro to Meso: Critical Steps in Conceptualizing and Conducting Multilevel Research , 2000 .

[115]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[116]  A. Giddens Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis , 1979 .

[117]  Michael E. Raynor,et al.  The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth , 2003 .

[118]  Michael Tracey,et al.  An Explanatory Model and Measurement Instrument: A Guide to Supply Chain Management Research and Applications , 2004 .

[119]  Edward B. Roberts,et al.  Entrepreneurs in high technology : lessons from MIT and beyond , 1991 .

[120]  R. Greenwood,et al.  Institutional Entrepreneurship in Mature Fields: The Big Five Accounting Firms , 2006 .

[121]  M. Callon Actor-Network Theory—The Market Test , 1999 .

[122]  Lotfi Belkhir,et al.  Managing Innovation at Xerox , 2001 .

[123]  Robert Phaal,et al.  Technology management tools: concept, development and application , 2006 .

[124]  J. L. Pierce,et al.  Organization Structure, Individual Attitudes and Innovation , 1977 .

[125]  C. Todd,et al.  Innovation and SMEs , 2000 .

[126]  M. Assink Inhibitors of disruptive innovation capability: a conceptual model , 2006 .

[127]  Dylan Jones-Evans,et al.  Technical Entrepreneurship, Experience and the Management of Small Technology-Based Firms , 1997 .

[128]  Ammon Salter,et al.  Investigating the sources of process innovation among UK manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[129]  Andreas Herrmann,et al.  Determinants of radical product innovations , 2006 .

[130]  C. Markides Disruptive Innovation: In Need of Better Theory* , 2006 .

[131]  Rick Delbridge,et al.  Reflections on developments in institutional theory: Toward a relational approach , 2007 .

[132]  One Point of View: Internal R&D—Vital but Only One Piece of the Innovation Puzzle , 2004 .

[133]  Philip Mirowski,et al.  Science Bought and Sold , 2002 .

[134]  Frank M. Andrews,et al.  Scientists in Organizations , 1968 .

[135]  Markus Balzat,et al.  Recent trends in the research on national innovation systems , 2004 .

[136]  R. Katz,et al.  Anticipating disruptive innovation , 2004, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[137]  P. Trott Innovation Management And New Product Development , 2004 .

[138]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[139]  Davide Consoli,et al.  INNOVATION PLATFORMS AND THE GOVERNANCE OF KNOWLEDGE: EVIDENCE FROM ITALY AND THE UK , 2008 .

[140]  Jerker Denrell Vicarious Learning, Undersampling of Failure, and the Myths of Management , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[141]  Luke Georghiou,et al.  Evaluation of national foresight activities: Assessing rationale, process and impact , 2006 .

[142]  R. Lambert,et al.  Lambert Review of Business-University Collaboration: Final Report , 2003 .

[143]  Clayton M. Christensen,et al.  Foundations for Growth: How to Identify and Build Disruptive New Businesses , 2002 .

[144]  Nigel King,et al.  Innovation at Work: The Research Literature , 1990 .

[145]  John Groenewegen,et al.  The Evolution of National Innovation Systems , 2006 .

[146]  Kenneth John Peattie,et al.  The Teaching Company Scheme: Effecting Organizational Change through Academic/Practitioner Collaboration , 1993 .

[147]  Patricia H. Thornton Markets from Culture: Institutional Logics and Organizational Decisions in Higher Education Publishing , 2004 .

[148]  Kevin Morgan,et al.  The Regional Innovation Paradox: Innovation Policy and Industrial Policy , 2002 .

[149]  Nigel King,et al.  Modelling the innovation process: An empirical comparison of approaches , 1992 .

[150]  Boaz Bernstein,et al.  From Invention to Innovation: Toward Developing an Integrated Innovation Model for Biotech Firms , 2006, Journal of Product Innovation Management.

[151]  J. Battilana Agency and Institutions: The Enabling Role of Individuals’ Social Position , 2006 .

[152]  M. Quéré National systems of innovation and national systems of corporate governance: a missing link? , 2004 .

[153]  B. Verspagen,et al.  Systems of Innovation , 2009 .

[154]  Maurice Punch,et al.  The politics and ethics of fieldwork , 1985 .

[155]  G. Ahuja The duality of collaboration : Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages , 2000 .

[156]  Luke Georghiou,et al.  Evaluating technology programs: tools and methods , 2000 .

[157]  Technology Competitiveness in Emerging Markets: The Case of the Brazilian Polymer Industry , 2005 .

[158]  A. Giddens The Constitution of Society , 1985 .

[159]  J. Harrison The Strategic Use of Corporate Board Committees , 1987 .

[160]  Robert W. Fri,et al.  The Role of Knowledge: Technological Innovation in the Energy System , 2003 .

[161]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[162]  S. Worchel,et al.  The Social psychology of intergroup relations , 1979 .

[163]  Roger G. Noll,et al.  The Technology Pork Barrel , 1991 .

[164]  C. Robson,et al.  Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers , 1993 .

[165]  G. Tellis Disruptive Technology or Visionary Leadership? , 2006 .

[166]  Tim Turpin,et al.  Common purpose and divided loyalties: the risks and rewards of cross-sector collaboration for academic and government researchers , 2005 .

[167]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Research on the management of innovation : the Minnesota studies , 1991 .

[168]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[169]  P. Berger,et al.  Social Construction of Reality , 1991, The SAGE International Encyclopedia of Mass Media and Society.

[170]  J. Metcalfe Technology systems and technology policy in an evolutionary framework , 1995 .

[171]  Michael E. Holmes,et al.  Organizational Change and Innovation Processes: Theory and Methods for Research , 2000 .

[172]  John Bessant,et al.  Managing Innovation: Integrating Technological, Market, and Organizational Change, 2nd Edition , 2001 .

[173]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy , 2006 .

[174]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide , 2005 .

[175]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Perspectives on technology , 1977 .

[176]  Gerard H. Gaynor,et al.  Handbook of Technology Management , 1996 .

[177]  Erwin Danneels Disruptive Technology Reconsidered: A Critique and Research Agenda , 2004 .

[178]  D.E. Kash,et al.  To manage complex innovation, ask the right questions , 2003, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[179]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[180]  M. West Innovation and creativity at work , 1997 .

[181]  Philip E. T. Lewis,et al.  Research Methods for Business Students , 2006 .