RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE DIGIT CANCELLATION TEST, A BRIEF SCREEN OF ATTENTION

The reliability and validity of a screening test called the D-CAT (Digit Cancellation Test) were evaluated across two studies. The D-CAT was developed to provide a highly practical and user-friendly assessment of various aspects of prefrontal cortex functioning, including information processing speed, the ability to focus attention, and executive functioning. Participants perform the D-CAT by deleting given target numbers on a sheet of randomly arranged possibilities. In Study 1, the reliability of the D-CAT was evaluated using a test-retest paradigm. Reasonably high correlations between scores on the two test sessions were obtained. In Study 2, construct validity was examined using a sample of participants with traumatic brain injury. TBI participants showed significantly lower D-CAT performance than age and education level matched healthy controls. On the basis of these findings, the D-CAT can be regarded as a reliable and valid screening test for attentional functioning.

[1]  M. Rosenthal.  Neuropsychological Rehabilitation after Brain Injury , 1986 .

[2]  Florin Dolcos,et al.  Attention-related activity during episodic memory retrieval: a cross-function fMRI study , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  J. Becker,et al.  Alternate forms of the Auditory-Verbal Learning Test: issues of test comparability, longitudinal reliability, and moderating demographic variables. , 1995, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[4]  J. Becker,et al.  Erratum: Alternate forms of the auditory-verbal learning test: Issues of test comparability, longitudinal reliability, and moderating demographic variables (Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology (1995) 10:2 (133-145)) , 1997 .

[5]  E C Hills,et al.  Effect of stimulus number, target-to-distractor ratio, and motor speed on visual spatial search quality following traumatic brain injury. , 1997, Brain injury.

[6]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Evidence for a two-stage model of spatial working memory processing within the lateral frontal cortex: a positron emission tomography study. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  J. Brandt,et al.  Development and psychometric properties of the brief test of attention , 1996 .

[8]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Working memory impairments in traumatic brain injury: evidence from a dual-task paradigm , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[9]  J. Borg,et al.  Incidence, risk factors and prevention of mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. , 2004, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[10]  J. Brandt,et al.  Stability of performance on the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test. , 1995, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[11]  住民検診を対象とした認知機能検査バッテリ（NU-CAB）作成の試み , 2004 .

[12]  K. Heilman,et al.  Letter cancellation performance in Alzheimer's disease , 1995 .

[13]  G. Orban,et al.  Attention Mechanisms in Visual SearchAn fMRI Study , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  J. Nici,et al.  A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests, 2nd ed , 2000 .

[15]  M. Ettenhofer,et al.  A Comparison of Long-Term Postconcussive Symptoms between University Students with and without a History of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury or Orthopedic Injury , 2012, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[16]  T. Fritsch,et al.  Effects of Stimulus Properties and Age on Random-Array Letter Cancellation Tasks , 2000 .

[17]  R. Jung.  Neuropsychological Assessment, 4th ed. , 2005 .

[18]  M. Mesulam,et al.  Right cerebral dominance in spatial attention. Further evidence based on ipsilateral neglect. , 1987, Archives of neurology.

[19]  L. Rapport,et al.  Relationship of IQ to verbal learning and memory: test and retest. , 1997, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[20]  Robert J. Spencer,et al.  The Contributions of Self-reported Injury Characteristics and Psychiatric Symptoms to Cognitive Functioning in OEF/OIF Veterans with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury , 2012, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[21]  T. Hatta,et al.  RE-ANALYSIS OF THE PERFORMANCE OF TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY PATIENTS ON THE AVAILABLE NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS , 2003 .

[22]  Test-retest reliability of the Halstead Impairment Index in hospitalized alcholic and nonalcoholic males with mild to moderate neuropsychological impairment. , 1981, Journal of clinical neuropsychology.

[23]  A. Baddeley.  The episodic buffer: a new component of working memory? , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  I. Grant,et al.  Test–retest reliability and practice effects of Expanded Halstead–Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery , 1999, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[25]  T. I. King,et al.  Introduction to Cognitive Rehabilitation: Theory and Practice , 1991 .

[26]  O. Spreen,et al.  Comprar A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests - Administration, Norms, and Commentary | Esther Strauss | 9780195159578 | Oxford University Press , 2009 .

[27]  L. Diller,et al.  Unilateral spatial neglect: biases in contralateral search and fine spatial attention. , 1988, Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists.

[28]  R. Charter,et al.  Sample size requirements for precise estimates of reliability, generalizability, and validity coefficients. , 1999, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[29]  J. C. Ballard.  Computerized assessment of sustained attention: a review of factors affecting vigilance performance. , 1996, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[30]  David R. Cox,et al.  Neuropsychological Management of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury , 2001 .

[31]  C. Mateer,et al.  Neuropsychological Management of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury , 1999 .

[32]  J. Fisk,et al.  Limitations of the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test as a measure of working memory in patients with multiple sclerosis , 2001, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[33]  D. Geldmacher.  Stimulus Characteristics Determine Processing Approach on Random Array Letter-Cancellation Tasks , 1998, Brain and Cognition.

[34]  S. Dikmen,et al.  Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Clinical and Conceptual Complexities , 2012, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[35]  H. Coslett,et al.  Frequency and duration of inattentive behavior after traumatic brain injury: Effects of distraction, task, and practice , 2000, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[36]  ● Pytorch,et al.  Attention! , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[37]  E. Bullmore,et al.  Neural correlates of working memory in a visual letter monitoring task: an fMRI study , 1995, Neuroreport.