An Efficient Parameterized Mesh Method for Large Shape Variation in Optimal Designs of Electromagnetic Devices

An algorithm with parameterized mesh generation, refinement and morphing is presented for the optimal design of electromagnetic (EM) devices. The method can do without mesh regeneration when changing design parameters, hence a lot of computation time can be saved in finite element (FE) parameter sweeping analysis. When the design parameters change, a new mesh can be obtained immediately with this proposed technique by simply resetting the coordinates of the nodes in the parameterized mesh. For nonlinear problems, a good initial value can be obtained from the solution on the former mesh to facilitate fast convergence of the nonlinear iterations for subsequent computation. An efficient memory procedure dealing with the design parameters and a practical technique allowing for large shape variation are also presented in the proposed method. Based on the objective function values by post-processing the FE results when sweeping certain sampling points in the design space, an optimization problem can be reconstructed using the response surface methodology. The differential evolution method is used as an optimization solver to search for the optimal solution efficiently. The TEAM Workshop Problem 25 is used as an example to showcase the efficiency and effectiveness of the proposed method.

[1]  Katsumi Yamazaki,et al.  Shape Optimization of Rotating Machines Using Time-Stepping Adaptive Finite Element Method , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[3]  L. Freitag,et al.  Tetrahedral mesh improvement via optimization of the element condition number , 2002 .

[4]  S. L. Ho,et al.  A Moving Mesh Embedded Algorithm in Finite Element Method for Optimal Design of Electromagnetic Devices , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[5]  Brian T. Helenbrook,et al.  Mesh deformation using the biharmonic operator , 2003 .

[6]  Hua Su,et al.  Applying response surface methodology in the design and optimization of electromagnetic devices , 1997 .

[7]  Francesca Rapetti,et al.  An overlapping mortar element approach to coupled magneto-mechanical problems , 2010, Math. Comput. Simul..

[8]  S.Y. Yang,et al.  A response surface methodology based on improved compactly supported radial basis function and its application to rapid optimizations of electromagnetic devices , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[9]  Kyung K. Choi,et al.  Remesh-free shape optimization using the wavelet-Galerkin method , 2004 .

[10]  Katsumi Yamazaki,et al.  Rotor-Shape Optimization of Interior-Permanent-Magnet Motors to Reduce Harmonic Iron Losses , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[11]  Yingying Yao,et al.  A Global Optimization Algorithm Based on C1 Piecewise Response Surface Patches , 2006, 2006 12th Biennial IEEE Conference on Electromagnetic Field Computation.

[12]  Yingying Yao,et al.  A Global Optimization Algorithm Based on $C^{1}$ Piecewise Response Surface Patches , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[13]  Rainer Storn,et al.  Differential Evolution – A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces , 1997, J. Glob. Optim..

[14]  K. Yamazaki,et al.  An Adaptive Finite Element Method for Minor Shape Modification in Optimization Algorithms , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[15]  Paolo Bettini,et al.  A Discrete Geometric Approach to Solving 2-D Non-Linear Magnetostatic Problems , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[16]  Jan K. Sykulski,et al.  Computational electromagnetics for design optimisation: the state of the art and conjectures for the future , 2009 .

[17]  S.R.H. Hoole,et al.  Geometric parametrization and constrained optimization techniques in the design of salient pole synchronous machines , 1992 .

[18]  Maurizio Repetto,et al.  Stochastic algorithms in electromagnetic optimization , 1998 .