Dynamic probability assessment of urban natural gas pipeline accidents considering integrated external activities

Abstract Urban gas pipelines usually have high structural vulnerability due to long service time. The locations across urban areas with high population density make the gas pipelines easily exposed to external activities. Recently, urban pipelines may also have been the target of terrorist attacks. Nevertheless, the intentional damage, i.e. terrorist attack, was seldom considered in previous risk analysis of urban gas pipelines. This work presents a dynamic risk analysis of external activities to urban gas pipelines, which integrates unintentional and intentional damage to pipelines in a unified framework. A Bayesian network mapping from the Bow-tie model is used to represent the evolution process of pipeline accidents initiating from intentional and unintentional hazards. The probabilities of basic events and safety barriers are estimated by adopting the Fuzzy set theory and hierarchical Bayesian analysis (HBA). The developed model enables assessment of the dynamic probabilities of consequences and identifies the most credible contributing factors to the risk, given observed evidence. It also captures both data and model uncertainties. Eventually, an industrial case is presented to illustrate the applicability and effectiveness of the developed methodology. It is observed that the proposed methodology helps to more accurately conduct risk assessment and management of urban natural gas pipelines.

[1]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Failure probability analysis of the urban buried gas pipelines using Bayesian networks , 2017 .

[2]  Michalis Christou,et al.  Identification of reference accident scenarios in SEVESO establishments , 2005, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  Curtis Smith,et al.  Bayesian inference in probabilistic risk assessment - The current state of the art , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[4]  Yunhua Gong,et al.  STAMP-based causal analysis of China-Donghuang oil transportation pipeline leakage and explosion accident , 2018, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries.

[5]  Brane Širok,et al.  Towards more detailed determination of third party impact on risk on natural gas pipelines: Influence of population density , 2015 .

[6]  Wei Liang,et al.  Risk identification of third-party damage on oil and gas pipelines through the Bayesian network , 2018, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries.

[7]  Nima Khakzad,et al.  Dynamic risk analysis using bow-tie approach , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[8]  Jinduo Xing,et al.  An urban pipeline accident model based on system engineering and game theory , 2020 .

[9]  Nicola Paltrinieri,et al.  On the application of near accident data to risk analysis of major accidents , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[10]  Sohag Kabir,et al.  A fuzzy Bayesian network approach for risk analysis in process industries , 2017 .

[11]  Min Xie,et al.  A Real-Time Fault Diagnosis Methodology of Complex Systems Using Object-Oriented Bayesian Networks , 2016, Bayesian Networks in Fault Diagnosis.

[12]  Guoming Chen,et al.  Developing a dynamic model for risk analysis under uncertainty: Case of third-party damage on subsea pipelines , 2018, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries.

[13]  Brian Veitch,et al.  A Flexible Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling Technique for Risk Analysis of Major Accidents , 2017, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[14]  Hong Zhang,et al.  Study on Failure of Third-Party Damage for Urban Gas Pipeline Based on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation , 2016, PloS one.

[15]  Noor Quddus,et al.  Bayesian network and game theory risk assessment model for third-party damage to oil and gas pipelines , 2020 .

[16]  F. Khan,et al.  Marine transportation risk assessment using Bayesian Network: Application to Arctic waters , 2018, Ocean Engineering.

[17]  Christian Delvosalle,et al.  ARAMIS project: a comprehensive methodology for the identification of reference accident scenarios in process industries. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[18]  Toly Chen,et al.  A fuzzy set approach for event tree analysis , 2001, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[19]  Manchun Li,et al.  Quantitative risk analysis of urban natural gas pipeline networks using geographical information systems , 2013 .

[20]  Rouzbeh Abbassi,et al.  Major accident modelling using spare data , 2017 .

[21]  Faisal Khan,et al.  Risk assessment of rare events , 2015 .

[22]  Wei Liang,et al.  Assessing and classifying risk of pipeline third-party interference based on fault tree and SOM , 2012, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[23]  Noor Quddus,et al.  Towards a causal model from pipeline incident data analysis , 2020 .

[24]  Xiaoli Meng,et al.  A novel method of risk assessment based on cloud inference for natural gas pipelines , 2016 .

[25]  Pavanaditya Badida,et al.  Risk evaluation of oil and natural gas pipelines due to natural hazards using fuzzy fault tree analysis , 2019, Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering.

[26]  Xinhong Li,et al.  An integrated methodology to manage risk factors of aging urban oil and gas pipelines , 2020 .

[27]  Z Y Han,et al.  Comparison study on qualitative and quantitative risk assessment methods for urban natural gas pipeline network. , 2011, Journal of hazardous materials.

[28]  Jiang Xu,et al.  Analysis on accident-causing factors of urban buried gas pipeline network by combining DEMATEL, ISM and BN methods , 2019, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries.

[29]  T. Onisawa An application of fuzzy concepts to modelling of reliability analysis , 1990 .

[30]  Brian Veitch,et al.  Fault and Event Tree Analyses for Process Systems Risk Analysis: Uncertainty Handling Formulations , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[31]  Brian Veitch,et al.  Arctic shipping accident scenario analysis using Bayesian Network approach , 2017 .

[32]  Vikram Garaniya,et al.  Risk-based maintenance planning of subsea pipelines through fatigue crack growth monitoring , 2017 .

[33]  Rui He,et al.  A quantitative risk analysis model considering uncertain information , 2018, Process Safety and Environmental Protection.