Dose response in prostate cancer with 8-12 years' follow-up.

PURPOSE This communication reports the long-term results of the original group of prostate cancer patients who participated in the first prospective Fox Chase Cancer Center radiation dose escalation study for which 8-12 years of follow-up is now available. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between March 1, 1989 and October 31, 1992, 232 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer received three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy only at Fox Chase Cancer Center in a prospective dose-escalation study. Of these patients, 229 were assessable. The 8-, 10-, and 12-year actuarial rates of biochemical control (biochemically no evidence of disease [bNED]), freedom from distant metastasis (FDM), and morbidity were calculated. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess multivariately the predictors of bNED control and FDM, including pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (continuous), tumor stage (T1/T2a vs. T2b/T3), Gleason score (2-6 vs. 7-10), and radiation dose (continuous). The median total dose for all patients was 74 Gy (range 67-81). The median follow-up for living patients was 110 months (range 89-147). bNED control was defined using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology consensus definition. RESULTS The actuarial bNED control for all patients included in this series was 55% at 5 years, 48% at 10 years, and 48% at 12 years. Patients with pretreatment PSA levels of 10-20 ng/mL had statistically significant differences (19% vs. 31% vs. 84%, p = 0.0003) in bNED control when stratified by dose (<71.5, 71.5-75.6, and > 75.6 Gy, respectively) on univariate analysis. For the 229 patients with follow-up, 124 (54%) were clinically and biochemically without evidence of disease. Sixty-nine patients were alive at the time of last follow-up, and 55 patients were dead of intercurrent disease. On multivariate analysis, radiation dose was a statistically significant predictor of bNED control for all patients and for unfavorable patients with a pretreatment PSA <10 ng/mL. For the patients with a pretreatment PSA level of 10-20 ng/mL, the radiation dose was a statistically significant predictor across all groups. No radiation dose response was seen for those patients with a pretreatment PSA level >20 ng/mL, although large numbers of patients are required to demonstrate a difference. The radiation dose, Gleason score, and palpation T stage were significant predictors for the entire patient set, as well as for those with pretreatment PSA levels between 10 and 20 ng/mL. The FDM rate for all patients included in this series was 89%, 83%, and 83% at 5, 10, and 12 years, respectively. For patients with pretreatment PSA levels <10 ng/mL, all four covariates (radiation dose, Gleason score, pretreatment PSA, and palpation T stage) were significant predictors of distance metastasis. Using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group morbidity scale, no difference was noted in the frequency of Grade 2 and 3 genitourinary and Grade 3 gastrointestinal morbidity when patients in this data set were stratified by radiation dose. However, a significant increase occurred in Grade 2 gastrointestinal complications as the radiation dose increased. CONCLUSION The long-term results of the original Fox Chase radiation dose escalation study with >9 years of median follow-up confirm the existence of a dose response for both bNED control and FDM. The dose response in prostate cancer is real, and the absence of biochemical recurrence after 8 years demonstrates the lack of late failure and suggests cure.

[1]  G. Hanks,et al.  Updated results of the phase III Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trial 85-31 evaluating the potential benefit of androgen suppression following standard radiation therapy for unfavorable prognosis carcinoma of the prostate. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  C. Reddy,et al.  Radiation dose response in patients with favorable localized prostate cancer (Stage T1-T2, biopsy Gleason < or = 6, and pretreatment prostate-specific antigen < or = 10). , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  P. Maingon,et al.  Dose escalation with 3D-CRT in prostate cancer: French study of dose escalation with conformal 3D radiotherapy in prostate cancer-preliminary results. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  T E Schultheiss,et al.  Survival advantage for prostate cancer patients treated with high-dose three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. , 1999, The cancer journal from Scientific American.

[5]  A. Markoe,et al.  Preliminary report of toxicity following 3D radiation therapy for prostate cancer on 3DOG/RTOG 9406. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  T E Schultheiss,et al.  Conformal technique dose escalation for prostate cancer: biochemical evidence of improved cancer control with higher doses in patients with pretreatment prostate-specific antigen > or = 10 NG/ML. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  D. Cox Regression Models and Life-Tables , 1972 .

[8]  E. Kaplan,et al.  Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations , 1958 .

[9]  H. Sandler,et al.  3D conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) for high grade prostate cancer: a multi-institutional review. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  Dennis Mah,et al.  Characteristics and quality assurance of a dedicated open 0.23 T MRI for radiation therapy simulation. , 2002, Medical physics.

[11]  G Starkschall,et al.  Preliminary results of a randomized radiotherapy dose-escalation study comparing 70 Gy with 78 Gy for prostate cancer. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  A. Hanlon,et al.  Dose selection for prostate cancer patients based on dose comparison and dose response studies. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  M. Bolla Adjuvant Hormonal Treatment with Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer , 1998, European Urology.

[14]  D. Grignon,et al.  Phase III radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) trial 86-10 of androgen deprivation adjuvant to definitive radiotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  James D. Cox,et al.  Consensus statement: Guidelines for PSA following radiation therapy , 1997 .

[16]  W. R. Lee,et al.  2 Conformal technique dose escalation in prostate cancer: improved cancer control with higher doses in patients with pretreatment PSA 10 ngm/ml , 1995 .

[17]  C C Ling,et al.  High dose radiation delivered by intensity modulated conformal radiotherapy improves the outcome of localized prostate cancer. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[18]  R J Myerson,et al.  Late effects of radiation therapy on the gastrointestinal tract. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  T E Schultheiss,et al.  Lateral rectal shielding reduces late rectal morbidity following high dose three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: further evidence for a significant dose effect. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  H. Sandler,et al.  Results of 3D conformal radiotherapy in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  A. Hanlon,et al.  Defining the appropriate radiation dose for pretreatment PSA < or = 10 ng/mL prostate cancer. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  C. Compton,et al.  AJCC Cancer Staging Manual , 2002, Springer New York.

[23]  T E Schultheiss,et al.  A comparison of daily CT localization to a daily ultrasound-based system in prostate cancer. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  M. Roach,et al.  Radiotherapy for high grade clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[25]  A. Hanlon,et al.  Defining the optimal radiation dose with three‐dimensional conformal radiation therapy for patients with nonmetastatic prostate carcinoma by using recursive partitioning techniques , 2001, Cancer.