Hidden Markov model‐based real‐time transient identifications in nuclear power plants

In this article, a transient identification method based on a stochastic approach with the hidden Markov model (HMM) has been suggested and evaluated experimentally for the classification of nine types of transients in nuclear power plants (NPPs). A transient is defined as when a plant proceeds to an abnormal state from a normal state. Identification of the types of transients during an early accident stage in NPPs is crucial for proper action selection. The transient can be identified by its unique time‐dependent patterns related to the principal variables. The HMM, a double‐stochastic process, can be applied to transient identification that is a spatial and temporal classification problem under a statistical pattern‐recognition framework. The trained HMM is created for each transient from a set of training data by the maximum‐likelihood estimation method which uses a forward‐backward algorithm and the Baum‐Welch re‐estimation algorithm. The transient identification is determined by calculating which model has the highest probability for given test data using the Viterbi algorithm. Several experimental tests have been performed with normalization methods, clustering algorithms, and a number of states in HMM. There are also a few experimental tests that have been performed, including superimposing random noise, adding systematic error, and adding untrained transients to verify its performance and robustness. The proposed real‐time transient identification system has been proven to have many advantages, although there are still some problems that should be solved before applying it to an operating NPP. Further efforts are being made to improve the system performance and robustness in order to demonstrate reliability and accuracy to the required level. © 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  N. Wainwright.  A regulator's viewpoint on the use of Al in the nuclear industry , 1995 .

[2]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  The self-organizing map , 1990 .

[3]  J. Penman,et al.  The use of hidden Markov models for condition monitoring electrical machines , 1993 .

[4]  Kil To Chong,et al.  Nonlinear identification of process dynamics using neural networks , 1992 .

[5]  Lawrence A. Bruckner.  ON CHERNOFF FACES , 1979 .

[6]  Thad Starner,et al.  Visual Recognition of American Sign Language Using Hidden Markov Models. , 1995 .

[7]  Biing-Hwang Juang,et al.  Hidden Markov Models for Speech Recognition , 1991 .

[8]  R. E. Uhrig,et al.  Accident scenario diagnostics with neural networks , 1992 .

[9]  Brian Hanson,et al.  Enhancing the discrimination of speaker independent hidden Markov models with corrective training , 1989, International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing,.

[10]  Junji Yamato,et al.  Recognizing human action in time-sequential images using hidden Markov model , 1992, Proceedings 1992 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[11]  Kee-Choon Kwon,et al.  The real-time functional test facility for advanced instrumentation and control in nuclear power plants , 1999 .

[12]  Soon Heung Chang,et al.  Identification of reactor vessel failures using spatiotemporal neural networks , 1996 .

[13]  Alex Pentland,et al.  Coupled hidden Markov models for complex action recognition , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[14]  Hiroshi Seki,et al.  Abnormal Event Identification in Nuclear Power Plants Using a Neural Network and Knowledge Processing , 1993 .

[15]  Qiuming Zhu,et al.  Hidden Markov model for dynamic obstacle avoidance of mobile robot navigation , 1991, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[16]  Padhraic J. Smyth,et al.  Hidden Markov models for fault detection in dynamic systems , 1993 .

[17]  Inn Seock Kim.  Computerized systems for on-line management of failures: a state-of-the-art discussion of alarm systems and diagnostic systems applied in the nuclear industry , 1994 .

[18]  Lawrence R. Rabiner,et al.  A tutorial on hidden Markov models and selected applications in speech recognition , 1989, Proc. IEEE.

[19]  Christophe Couvreur.  Environmental Sound Recognition: A Statistical Approach , 1997 .

[20]  G. Carrault,et al.  Heart signal recognition by Hidden Markov Models: the ECG case. , 1994, Methods of information in medicine.

[21]  Soon Heung Chang,et al.  Application of neural networks to a connectionist expert system for transient identification in nuclear power plants , 1993 .

[22]  Dennis W. Ruck,et al.  Recognition of moving light displays using hidden Markov models , 1995, Pattern Recognit..

[23]  J. W. Hines,et al.  A hybrid approach for detecting and isolating faults in nuclear power plant interacting systems , 1996 .

[24]  Vincent Fontaine,et al.  AUTOMATIC CLASSIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE EVENTS BY HIDDEN MARKOV MODELS , 1998 .

[25]  A. Kundu,et al.  An integrated hybrid neural network and hidden Markov model classifier for sonar signal classification , 1995, 1995 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[26]  David Haussler,et al.  A Generalized Hidden Markov Model for the Recognition of Human Genes in DNA , 1996, ISMB.

[27]  Lefteri H. Tsoukalas,et al.  A hybrid neural network---fuzzy logic approach to nuclear power plant transient identification , 1991 .

[28]  Anujit Basu,et al.  Nuclear power plant status diagnostics using a neural network with dynamic node architecture , 1992 .

[29]  Mark R. DeWitt.  High Range Resolution Radar Target Identification Using the Prony Model and Hidden Markov Models , 1992 .

[30]  Jie Lin,et al.  Nuclear power plant transient diagnostics using artificial neural networks that allow 'don't-know' classifications , 1995 .