Attitudinal Balance and Cause-Related Marketing: An Empirical Application of Balance Theory

We examine the effects of pre-existing organizational attitudes on consumer response to cause-related marketing (CRM) alliances, using a Balance Theory framework. Two experiments demonstrate that balanced attitudes (either both positive or both negative) resulted in perceptions of appropriateness, but did not necessarily lead to positive affect. The positive balance scenario led to a synergistic attitudinal boost when both pre-existing attitudes were positive. Attitudinal contamination was evident when either pre-existing attitude was negative. Fit operated within the balance scenario to enhance perceptions of the strength of the CRM alliance, leading to more positive responses.

[1]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[2]  M. Strahilevitz,et al.  Donations to Charity as Purchase Incentives: How Well They Work May Depend on What You are Trying to Sell , 1998 .

[3]  F. Heider Attitudes and cognitive organization. , 1946, The Journal of psychology.

[4]  P. Herr,et al.  Impact of Dominance and Relatedness on Brand Extensions , 1996 .

[5]  David M. Boush,et al.  A Process-Tracing Study of Brand Extension Evaluation , 1991 .

[6]  Michel Tuan Pham The Logic of Feeling , 2004 .

[7]  Alice M. Tybout,et al.  Designing Research for Application , 1981 .

[8]  R. Speed,et al.  Determinants of sports sponsorship response , 2000 .

[9]  C. Bhattacharya,et al.  Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility , 2001 .

[10]  Barbara A. Lafferty,et al.  CAUSE-BRAND ALLIANCES: DOES THE CAUSE HELP THE BRAND OR DOES THE BRAND HELP THE CAUSE? , 2005 .

[11]  Kiwan Park,et al.  Brand Congruity and Comparative Advertising: When and Why Comparative Advertisements Lead to Greater Elaboration , 2004 .

[12]  P. Herr,et al.  Dangerous Donations? The Effects of Cause-Related Marketing on Charity Attitude , 2003 .

[13]  C. Osgood,et al.  The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change. , 1955, Psychological review.

[14]  F. Heider The psychology of interpersonal relations , 1958 .

[15]  On the robustness and the direction of the effect of cause‐related marketing , 2003 .

[16]  T. Wilson,et al.  The Impact of Cause Branding on Consumer Reactions to Products: Does Product/Cause 'Fit' Really Matter? , 2004 .

[17]  N. Jordan Behavioral Forces That are a Function of Attitudes and of Cognitive Organization , 1953 .

[18]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Estimating and testing mediation and moderation in within-subject designs. , 2001, Psychological methods.

[19]  Ronald E. Goldsmith,et al.  The impact of the alliance on the partners: A look at cause–brand alliances , 2004 .

[20]  D. H. Dean,et al.  CONSUMER PERCEPTION OF CORPORATE DONATIONS Effects of Company Reputation for Social Responsibility and Type of Donation , 2003 .

[21]  P. Bloom,et al.  Does Corporate Sponsorship of a Socially-Oriented Message Make a Difference? An Investigation of the Effects of Sponsorship Identity on Responses to an Anti-Drinking and Driving Message , 2004 .

[22]  Kevin Lane Keller,et al.  Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions , 1990 .

[23]  John W. Pracejus,et al.  Integration of Positive and Negative Affective Stimuli , 2004 .

[24]  Satya Menon,et al.  Corporate Sponsorships of Philanthropic Activities: When Do They Impact Perception of Sponsor Brand? , 2003 .

[25]  J. Hitchon,et al.  Cause-Related Marketing Ads in the Light of Negative News , 2002 .

[26]  Donald R. Lichtenstein,et al.  The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Customer Donations to Corporate-Supported Nonprofits , 2004 .

[27]  Anthony D. Miyazaki,et al.  The influence of cause-related marketing on consumer choice: Does one good turn deserve another? , 2000 .

[28]  Bernard L. Simonin,et al.  Is a Company Known by the Company it Keeps? Assessing the Spillover Effects of Brand Alliances on Consumer Brand Attitudes , 1998 .

[29]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  Effects of extent of thought on the pleasantness ratings of p-o-x triads: Evidence for three judgmental tendencies in evaluating social situations. , 1981 .

[31]  Peter A. Dacin,et al.  The Effect of Brand Portfolio Characteristics on Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions , 1994 .

[32]  P. Bottomley,et al.  Do We Really Know how Consumers Evaluate Brand Extensions? Empirical Generalizations Based on Secondary Analysis of Eight Studies , 2001 .

[33]  F. Harary,et al.  STRUCTURAL BALANCE: A GENERALIZATION OF HEIDER'S THEORY1 , 1977 .

[34]  Susan M. Broniarczyk,et al.  The Importance of the Brand in Brand Extension , 1994 .