Object-based attention prioritizes working memory contents at a theta rhythm.

Attention selects relevant information regardless of whether it is physically present or internally stored in working memory. Perceptual research has shown that attentional selection of external information is better conceived as rhythmic prioritization than as stable allocation. Here we tested this principle using information processing of internal representations held in working memory. Participants memorized 4 spatial positions that formed the end points of 2 objects. One of the positions was cued for a delayed match-nonmatch test. When uncued positions were probed, participants responded faster to uncued positions located on the same object as the cued position than to those located on the other object, revealing object-based attention in working memory. Manipulating the interval between cue and probe at a high temporal resolution revealed that reaction times oscillated at a theta rhythm of 6 Hz. Moreover, oscillations showed an antiphase relationship between memorized but uncued positions on the same versus other object as the cued position, suggesting that attentional prioritization fluctuated rhythmically in an object-based manner. Our results demonstrate the highly rhythmic nature of attentional selection in working memory. Moreover, the striking similarity between rhythmic attentional selection of mental representations and perceptual information suggests that attentional oscillations are a general mechanism of information processing in human cognition. These findings have important implications for current, attention-based models of working memory. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

[1]  S. Kastner,et al.  A Rhythmic Theory of Attention , 2019, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  M. Pinsk,et al.  A Dynamic Interplay within the Frontoparietal Network Underlies Rhythmic Spatial Attention , 2018, Neuron.

[3]  Pascal Fries,et al.  A theta rhythm in macaque visual cortex and its attentional modulation , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  David C. Burr,et al.  Auditory Sensitivity and Decision Criteria Oscillate at Different Frequencies Separately for the Two Ears , 2017, Current Biology.

[5]  Markus Janczyk,et al.  The (Un)Clear Effects of Invalid Retro-Cues , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[6]  E. Wascher,et al.  The time course of visuo-spatial working memory updating revealed by a retro-cuing paradigm , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[7]  Rufin VanRullen,et al.  Attention searches nonuniformly in space and in time , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  S. Kastner,et al.  From Behavior to Neural Dynamics: An Integrated Theory of Attention , 2015, Neuron.

[9]  Huan Luo,et al.  Behavioral oscillation in priming: competing perceptual predictions conveyed in alternating theta-band rhythms. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[10]  P. Fries,et al.  Distributed Attention Is Implemented through Theta-Rhythmic Gamma Modulation , 2015, Current Biology.

[11]  Klaus Oberauer,et al.  Getting more from visual working memory: Retro-cues enhance retrieval and protect from visual interference. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  S. Vecera,et al.  Selection of multiple cued items is possible during visual short-term memory maintenance , 2015, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[13]  J. Kaiser,et al.  Activity in Human Visual and Parietal Cortex Reveals Object-Based Attention in Working Memory , 2015, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  J. Theeuwes,et al.  The time course of protecting a visual memory representation from perceptual interference , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[15]  M. Frank,et al.  Frontal theta as a mechanism for cognitive control , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  Huan Luo,et al.  Behavioral Oscillations in Attention: Rhythmic α Pulses Mediated through θ Band , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[17]  Dimitri M. Kullmann,et al.  Oscillatory multiplexing of population codes for selective communication in the mammalian brain , 2014, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[18]  Y. Saalmann,et al.  Rhythmic Sampling within and between Objects despite Sustained Attention at a Cued Location , 2013, Current Biology.

[19]  P. Fries,et al.  Attention Samples Stimuli Rhythmically , 2012, Current Biology.

[20]  K. Oberauer,et al.  Attention to Information in Working Memory , 2012 .

[21]  R. VanRullen,et al.  An oscillatory mechanism for prioritizing salient unattended stimuli , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  A. Nobre,et al.  Top-down modulation: bridging selective attention and working memory , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[23]  P. Roelfsema,et al.  Different states in visual working memory: when it guides attention and when it does not , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  Jochen Kaiser,et al.  Basic operations in working memory: Contributions from functional imaging studies , 2010, Behavioural Brain Research.

[25]  R. VanRullen,et al.  Spontaneous EEG oscillations reveal periodic sampling of visual attention , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  The blinking spotlight of attention , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Yuhong Jiang,et al.  Distributing versus focusing attention in visual short-term memory , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[28]  S. Luck,et al.  Attention effects during visual short-term memory maintenance: Protection or prioritization? , 2007 .

[29]  Andrew R. A. Conway,et al.  On the capacity of attention: Its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[30]  A. Nobre,et al.  Orienting Attention to Locations in Internal Representations , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  H. Spekreijse,et al.  Large capacity storage of integrated objects before change blindness , 2003, Vision Research.

[32]  K. Oberauer Access to information in working memory: exploring the focus of attention. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  R. Rafal,et al.  Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[34]  N. Cowan Evolving conceptions of memory storage, selective attention, and their mutual constraints within the human information-processing system. , 1988, Psychological bulletin.

[35]  F. Varela,et al.  Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[36]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[37]  A. Mehdizadeh,et al.  Intercontinental comparison of caustic ingestion in children , 2015, Korean journal of pediatrics.