Retrieval of boreal forest LAI using a forest reflectance model and empirical regressions

Abstract Spectral invariants provide a novel approach for characterizing canopy structure in forest reflectance models and for mapping biophysical variables using satellite images. We applied a photon recollision probability (p) based forest reflectance model (PARAS) to retrieve leaf area index (LAI) from fine resolution SPOT HRVIR and Landsat ETM+ satellite data. First, PARAS was parameterized using an extensive database of LAI-2000 measurements from five conifer-dominated boreal forest sites in Finland, and mixtures of field-measured forest understory spectra. The selected vegetation indices (e.g. reduced simple ratio, RSR), neural networks and kNN method were used to retrieve effective LAI (Le) based on reflectance model simulations. For comparison, we established empirical vegetation index-LAI regression models for our study sites. The empirical RSR–Le regression performed best when applied to an independent test site in southern Finland [RMSE 0.57 (24.2%)]. However, the difference to the best reflectance model based retrievals produced by neural networks was only marginal [RMSE 0.59 (25.1%)]. According to this study, the PARAS model provides a simple and flexible modelling tool for calibrating algorithms for LAI retrieval in conifer-dominated boreal forests. The advantage of PARAS is that it directly uses field measurements to parameterize canopy structure (LAI-2000, hemispherical photographs) and optical properties of foliage and understory.

[1]  Miina Rautiainen,et al.  Coupling forest canopy and understory reflectance in the Arctic latitudes of Finland , 2007 .

[2]  P. Stenberg.  Correcting LAI-2000 estimates for the clumping of needles in shoots of conifers , 1996 .

[3]  Andres Kuusk,et al.  Simulation of the reflectance of ground vegetation in sub-boreal forests , 2004 .

[4]  Frédéric Baret,et al.  Validation of global moderate-resolution LAI products: a framework proposed within the CEOS land product validation subgroup , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  Miina Rautiainen,et al.  Modeling the Spectral Signature of Forests: Application of Remote Sensing Models to Coniferous Canopies , 2008 .

[6]  A.R.G. Lang,et al.  Application of some of Cauchy's theorems to estimation of surface areas of leaves, needles and branches of plants, and light transmittance , 1991 .

[7]  P. Stenberg.  Simple analytical formula for calculating average photon recollision probability in vegetation canopies , 2007 .

[8]  Roberta E. Martin,et al.  PROSPECT-4 and 5: Advances in the leaf optical properties model separating photosynthetic pigments , 2008 .

[9]  P. Sen.  Estimates of the Regression Coefficient Based on Kendall's Tau , 1968 .

[10]  Miina Rautiainen,et al.  Boreal forest leaf area index from optical satellite images: model simulations and empirical analyses using data from central Finland , 2008 .

[11]  H. Smolander,et al.  Dependence of light interception efficiency of Scots pine shoots on structural parameters. , 1994, Tree physiology.

[12]  H. Theil.  A Rank-Invariant Method of Linear and Polynomial Regression Analysis , 1992 .

[13]  Pauline Stenberg,et al.  A simple parameterization of canopy reflectance using photon recollision probability , 2008 .

[14]  Tiit Nilson,et al.  Inversion of gap frequency data in forest stands , 1999 .

[15]  Nicholas L. Crookston,et al.  yaImpute: An R Package for kNN Imputation , 2008 .

[16]  F. Baret,et al.  PROSPECT: A model of leaf optical properties spectra , 1990 .

[17]  J. Chen,et al.  Retrieving chlorophyll content in conifer needles from hyperspectral measurements , 2008, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing.

[18]  P. Stenberg,et al.  Variation in the ratio of shoot silhouette area to needle area in fertilized and unfertilized Norway spruce trees. , 1995, Tree physiology.

[19]  R. Fernandes,et al.  Landsat-5 TM and Landsat-7 ETM+ based accuracy assessment of leaf area index products for Canada derived from SPOT-4 VEGETATION data , 2003 .

[20]  M. Nilsson,et al.  Combining national forest inventory field plots and remote sensing data for forest databases , 2008 .

[21]  R. Fernandes,et al.  Parametric (modified least squares) and non-parametric (Theil–Sen) linear regressions for predicting biophysical parameters in the presence of measurement errors , 2005 .

[22]  Miina Rautiainen,et al.  Reduced simple ratio better than NDVI for estimating LAI in Finnish pine and spruce stands , 2004 .

[23]  Michael Nobis,et al.  Automatic thresholding for hemispherical canopy-photographs based on edge detection , 2005 .

[24]  Jan Pisek,et al.  Algorithm for global leaf area index retrieval using satellite imagery , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[25]  A. Kuusk,et al.  Impact of understory vegetation on forest canopy reflectance and remotely sensed LAI estimates , 2006 .

[26]  S. Leblanc,et al.  Derivation and validation of Canada-wide coarse-resolution leaf area index maps using high-resolution satellite imagery and ground measurements , 2002 .

[27]  M. Rautiainen,et al.  On the relationship of canopy LAI and photon recollision probability in boreal forests. , 2009 .

[28]  G. Dedieu,et al.  SMAC: a simplified method for the atmospheric correction of satellite measurements in the solar spectrum , 1994 .

[29]  T. W. Ridler,et al.  Picture thresholding using an iterative selection method. , 1978 .

[30]  S. Leblanc,et al.  A Shortwave Infrared Modification to the Simple Ratio for LAI Retrieval in Boreal Forests: An Image and Model Analysis , 2000 .

[31]  Tiina Tonteri,et al.  Metsäkasvit kasvupaikoillaan - kasvupaikkatyypin, kasvillisuusvyöhykkeen, puuston kehitysluokan ja puulajin yhteys kasvilajien runsaussuhteisiin. , 2005 .

[32]  J. Chen,et al.  Retrieving Leaf Area Index of Boreal Conifer Forests Using Landsat TM Images , 1996 .

[33]  Philip Lewis,et al.  Canopy spectral invariants for remote sensing and model applications , 2007 .

[34]  S. Running,et al.  Synergistic algorithm for estimating vegetation canopy leaf area index and fraction of absorbed photosynthetically active , 1998 .

[35]  J. Chen,et al.  Defining leaf area index for non‐flat leaves , 1992 .

[36]  J. Chen.  Optically-based methods for measuring seasonal variation of leaf area index in boreal conifer stands , 1996 .

[37]  S. Ganguly,et al.  Generating vegetation leaf area index earth system data record from multiple sensors. Part 1: Theory , 2008 .

[38]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Evaluation of the MODIS LAI algorithm at a coniferous forest site in Finland , 2004 .

[39]  Heikki Smolander,et al.  The Ratio of Shoot Silhouette Area to Total Needle Area in Scots Pine , 1988, Forest Science.

[40]  Miina Rautiainen,et al.  Application of photon recollision probability in coniferous canopy reflectance simulations , 2005 .

[41]  Miina Rautiainen,et al.  Retrieval of leaf area index for a coniferous forest by inverting a forest reflectance model , 2005 .

[42]  O. Hagolle,et al.  LAI, fAPAR and fCover CYCLOPES global products derived from VEGETATION: Part 1: Principles of the algorithm , 2007 .

[43]  P. Stenberg,et al.  Simple parameterizations of the radiation budget of uniform broadleaved and coniferous canopies , 2005 .

[44]  Matti Maltamo,et al.  Airborne discrete-return LIDAR data in the estimation of vertical canopy cover, angular canopy closure and leaf area index , 2011 .

[45]  M. Schaepman,et al.  Applicability of the PROSPECT model for Norway spruce needles , 2006 .

[46]  F. Baret,et al.  Estimating Canopy Characteristics from Remote Sensing Observations: Review of Methods and Associated Problems , 2008 .

[47]  S. Liang.  Quantitative Remote Sensing of Land Surfaces , 2003 .

[48]  G. Foody,et al.  Predictive relations of tropical forest biomass from Landsat TM data and their transferability between regions , 2003 .