The nature and quality of the mathematical connections teachers make

Current reforms in mathematics education emphasise the need for pedagogy because it offers learners opportunities to develop their proficiency with complex high-level cognitive processes. One has always associated the ability to make mathematical connections, together with the teacher’s role in teaching them, with deep mathematical understanding. This article examines the nature and quality of the mathematical connections that the teachers’ representations of those connections enabled or constrained. The researchers made video recordings of four Grade 11 teachers as they taught a series of five lessons on algebra-related topics. The results showed that the teachers’ representations of mathematical connections were either faulty or superficial in most cases. It compromised the learners’ opportunities for making meaningful mathematical connections. The researchers concluded by suggesting that helping teachers to build their representation repertoires could increase the effectiveness of their instructional practices.

[1]  Glenda Anthony,et al.  Effective Pedagogy in Mathematics. Educational Practices Series-19. , 2009 .

[2]  Mitchell J. Nathan,et al.  The Real Story Behind Story Problems: Effects of Representations on Quantitative Reasoning , 2004 .

[3]  An analysis of the alignment of the grade 12 physical sciences examination and the core curriculum in South Africa , 2010 .

[4]  J. Muller,et al.  What Knowledge is Needed in the New Millennium? , 2001 .

[5]  David A. Squires,et al.  Curriculum alignment : research-based strategies for increasing student achievement , 2009 .

[6]  Michael Kainose Mhlolo,et al.  From coherence in theory to coherence in practice : a stock-take of the written, tested and taught National Curriculum Statement for Mathematics (NCSM) at Further Education and Training (FET) level in South Africa. , 2012 .

[7]  Charles W. Anderson,et al.  WHY STAYING ONE CHAPTER AHEAD DOESN'T REALLY WORK: SUBJECT-SPECIFIC PEDAGOGY , 1989 .

[8]  D. Ball.  Teaching, With Respect to Mathematics and Students , 2014 .

[9]  B. Rittle-Johnson,et al.  Making algebra work: Instructional strategies that deepen student understanding, within and between representations , 2009 .

[10]  Despina A. Stylianou.  Teachers’ conceptions of representation in middle school mathematics , 2010 .

[11]  2 National Curriculum Statements for Mathematics and Statistics , 2022 .

[12]  Anna Sierpinska,et al.  Understanding in Mathematics , 1994 .

[13]  Paul Andrews.  Comparative studies of mathematics teachers’ observable learning objectives: validating low inference codes , 2009 .

[14]  T. Cooper,et al.  Generalising the pattern rule for visual growth patterns: Actions that support 8 year olds’ thinking , 2008 .

[15]  Margaret Walshaw,et al.  Characteristics of Effective Teaching of Mathematics: A View from the West , 2009 .

[16]  Terry Wood,et al.  Beyond Classical Pedagogy : Teaching Elementary School Mathematics , 2001 .

[17]  A. Gagatsis,et al.  The Effects of Different Modes of Representation on Mathematical Problem Solving. , 2004 .

[18]  Stephen K. Reed,et al.  Using Multiple Representations to Improve Conceptions of Average Speed , 2002 .

[19]  Babette M. Benken,et al.  Teaching Mathematics for Understanding: An Analysis of Lessons Submitted by Teachers Seeking NBPTS Certification , 2009 .

[20]  Peter Galbraith,et al.  Modelling and Applications in Mathematics Education , 2007 .

[21]  Aldona Monika Businskas.  Conversations about connections: how secondary mathematics teachers conceptualize and contend with mathematical connections , 2008 .

[22]  Joan Ferrini-Mundy,et al.  Principles and Standards for School Mathematics: A Guide for Mathematicians , 2000 .

[23]  Steve Higgins,et al.  The array representation and primary children’s understanding and reasoning in multiplication , 2009 .