Computer-aided planning for endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms (CAPETA)

Endovascular treatment planning of intracranial aneurysms requires accurate quantification of their geometric parameters, including the neck length, dome height and maximum diameter. Today, the geometry of intracranial aneurysms is typically quantified manually based on three-dimensional (3D) Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) images. Since the repeatability of manual measurements is not guaranteed and their accuracy is dependent on the experience of the treating physician, we propose a semi-automated approach for computer-aided measurement of these parameters. In particular, a tubular deformable model, initialized based on user-provided points, is first fit to the surface of the parent artery. An initial estimate of the aneurysmal segment is obtained based on differences between the two surfaces. A 3D deformable contour model is then used to localize the aneurysmal neck and to separate its dome surface from the parent artery. Finally, approaches for estimation of the clinically relevant geometric parameters are applied based on the aneurysmal neck and dome surface. Results on 19 3D DSA datasets of saccular aneurysms indicate that, for the maximum diameter, the standard deviation of the difference between the proposed approach and two independent manual sets of measurements obtained by expert readers is similar to the inter-rater standard deviation. For the neck length and dome height, the results improve considerably if we exclude datasets with high deviation from the manual measurements.

[1]  M. L. Raghavan,et al.  Quantified aneurysm shape and rupture risk. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery.

[2]  D. Holdsworth,et al.  An analysis of the geometry of saccular intracranial aneurysms. , 1999, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[3]  G. Forbes,et al.  Interobserver variability in angiographic measurement and morphologic characterization of intracranial aneurysms: a report from the International Study of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms. , 1996, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[4]  Gilles Soulez,et al.  Clinical validation of a software for quantitative follow-up of abdominal aortic aneurysm maximal diameter and growth by CT angiography. , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[5]  Moonryul Jung,et al.  Snaking across 3D meshes , 2004, 12th Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications, 2004. PG 2004. Proceedings..

[6]  B. Weir Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a review. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[7]  J. Alison Noble,et al.  Determining X-ray projections for coil treatments of intracranial aneurysms , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  Robert A. McLaughlin,et al.  Demarcation of Aneurysms Using the Seed and Cull Algorithm , 2002, MICCAI.

[9]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[10]  William E. Lorensen,et al.  Marching cubes: A high resolution 3D surface construction algorithm , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[11]  Albert C. S. Chung,et al.  Augmented vessels for quantitative analysis of vascular abnormalities and endovascular treatment planning , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Bradford J. Wood,et al.  Segmentation of liver tumors using the Insight Segmentation and Registration Toolkit , 2004, CARS.

[13]  Carlos Miranda,et al.  Endovascular reconstruction of intracranial arteries by stent placement and combined techniques. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[14]  William J. Schroeder,et al.  The Visualization Toolkit , 2005, The Visualization Handbook.

[15]  Xiao Han,et al.  A Topology Preserving Level Set Method for Geometric Deformable Models , 2003, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..