Comparisons of fully automated syphilis tests with conventional VDRL and FTA-ABS tests.
暂无分享，去创建一个
[1] C. Marra,et al. The Rapid Plasma Reagin Test Cannot Replace the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory Test for Neurosyphilis Diagnosis , 2012, Sexually transmitted diseases.
[2] H. Nakagawa,et al. Examination of the correlation between the manual and automated serological testing methods for syphilis , 2012, The Journal of dermatology.
[3] Younhee Park,et al. Evaluation of a fully automated treponemal test and comparison with conventional VDRL and FTA-ABS tests. , 2011, American journal of clinical pathology.
[4] M. Binnicker,et al. Treponema-Specific Tests for Serodiagnosis of Syphilis: Comparative Evaluation of Seven Assays , 2011, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
[5] J. González-López,et al. Factors determining serologic response to treatment in patients with syphilis. , 2009, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.
[6] E. Love,et al. Serologic response to treatment of infectious syphilis. , 1991, Annals of internal medicine.
[7] S. Larsen,et al. Serological response to syphilis treatment. A new analysis of old data. , 1985, JAMA.
[8] E. Prieto,et al. Nontreponemal tests in the diagnosis of neurosyphilis: an evaluation of the Venereal Disease Research Laboratory (VDRL) and the Rapid Plasma Reagin (RPR) tests , 2008, Journal of clinical laboratory analysis.
[9] S. Larsen,et al. Laboratory diagnosis and interpretation of tests for syphilis. , 1995 .