Flowing Together: A Longitudinal Study of Collective Efficacy and Collective Flow Among Workgroups

ABSTRACT The aim of this study is to extend the Channel Model of Flow (Csikszentmihalyi, 1975, 1990) at the collective level (workgroups) by including collective efficacy beliefs as a predictor of collective flow based on the Social Cognitive Theory (Bandura, 1997, 2001). A two-wave longitudinal lab study was conducted with 250 participants working in 52 small groups. Longitudinal results from Structural Equation Modeling with data aggregated at the group level showed, as expected, that collective efficacy beliefs predict collective flow over time, both being related reciprocally. Findings and their theoretical and practical implications in the light of Social Cognitive Theory are discussed.

[1]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Talented Teenagers: The Roots of Success and Failure , 1993 .

[2]  Marisa Salanova,et al.  Perceived Collective Efficacy, Subjective Well-Being And Task Performance Among Electronic Work Groups , 2003 .

[3]  M. S. Soria,et al.  Technoflow among spanish and swedish students : a confirmatory factor multigroup analysis. 'Tecnoflow en estudiantes españoles y suecos : un análisis factorial confirmatorio con análisis multigrupo' , 2008 .

[4]  G. Caprara,et al.  Academic Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Quality of Experience in Learning , 2007, Journal of youth and adolescence.

[5]  Anthony J. Nyberg,et al.  Collective efficacy, group potency, and group performance: meta-analyses of their relationships, and test of a mediation model. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[6]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[7]  Alex Black,et al.  Motor mimicry as primitive empathy. , 1987 .

[8]  H. Bruch,et al.  The positive group affect spiral: a dynamic model of the emergence of positive affective similarity in work groups , 2008 .

[9]  S. Deshpande,et al.  Task Characteristics and the Experience of Optimal Flow in Human—Computer Interaction , 1994 .

[10]  Catherine Maguire,et al.  The Relationship between Job and Life Satisfaction: Evidence from a Remote Mining Community , 2000 .

[11]  Jenn-Yun Tein,et al.  Longitudinal measurement models in evaluation research: Examining stability and change , 1996 .

[12]  M. Westman.  Stress and Strain Crossover , 2001 .

[13]  N. Allen,et al.  Assessing dissimilarity relations under missing data conditions: evidence from computer simulations. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.

[14]  E. Deci,et al.  The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior , 2000 .

[15]  Robert R. Hirschfeld,et al.  Mental efficacy and physical efficacy at the team level: inputs and outcomes among newly formed action teams. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[16]  Robert E. Ployhart,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models , 2014 .

[17]  Alayne Armstrong.  The Fragility of Group Flow: The Experiences of Two Small Groups in a Middle School Mathematics Classroom. , 2008 .

[18]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[19]  C. J. Walker.  Experiencing flow: Is doing it together better than doing it alone? , 2010 .

[20]  J. Eccles,et al.  The Development of Competence Beliefs, Expectancies for Success, and Achievement Values from Childhood through Adolescence , 2002 .

[21]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Emotional Contagion , 1993 .

[22]  R. Hoyle.  The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. , 1995 .

[23]  M. Csíkszentmihályi.  Beyond boredom and anxiety , 1975 .

[24]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[25]  W. Schaufeli,et al.  “Yes, I Can, I Feel Good, and I Just Do It!” On Gain Cycles and Spirals of Efficacy Beliefs, Affect, and Engagement: EFFICACY BELIEFS, AFFECT, ENGAGEMENT , 2011 .

[26]  J. Gill.  Hierarchical Linear Models , 2005 .

[27]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  Emotional Contagion: Acknowledgments , 1993 .

[28]  P. Bliese.  Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. , 2000 .

[29]  R. Keith Sawyer,et al.  Group Creativity: Music, Theater, Collaboration , 2003 .

[30]  W. Schaufeli,et al.  When good is good: A virtuous circle of self-efficacy and flow at work among teachers , 2011 .

[31]  William H. Glick,et al.  Conceptualizing and Measuring Organizational and Psychological Climate: Pitfalls in Multilevel Research , 1985 .

[32]  N. Ashkanasy.  EMOTIONS AT MULTIPLE LEVELS: AN INTEGRATION , 2003 .

[33]  M. Salanova,et al.  How is flow experienced and by whom? Testing flow among occupations. , 2013, Stress and health : journal of the International Society for the Investigation of Stress.

[34]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  The Concept of Flow , 2014 .

[35]  H. Akaike.  Factor analysis and AIC , 1987 .

[36]  A. Bakker.  Flow among music teachers and their students: The crossover of peak experiences☆ , 2005 .

[37]  F. Massimini,et al.  The systematic assessment of flow in daily experience , 1988 .

[38]  R. Golembiewski.  Handbook of Organizational Behavior , 2001 .

[39]  P. Christopher Earley,et al.  EAST MEETS WEST MEETS MIDEAST: FURTHER EXPLORATIONS OF COLLECTIVISTIC AND INDIVIDUALISTIC WORK GROUPS. , 1991 .

[40]  D. Chan.  Functional Relations among Constructs in the Same Content Domain at Different Levels of Analysis: A Typology of Composition Models , 1998 .

[41]  W. Russell.  An Examination of Flow State Occurrence in College Athletes , 2001 .

[42]  A. Bandura.  Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[43]  G. Taylor,et al.  Conditions Of Happiness , 2007 .

[44]  R. Eisenberger,et al.  Flow experiences at work: for high need achievers alone? , 2005 .

[45]  W. Schaufeli,et al.  Enjoyment and absorption: An electronic diary study on daily flow patterns , 2011 .

[46]  Amy Buhl Conn,et al.  Is everyone in agreement? An exploration of within-group agreement in employee perceptions of the work environment. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[47]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[48]  M. Csíkszentmihályi,et al.  Optimal experience in work and leisure. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[49]  Ryan William Quinn.  Nuclear weapons and daily deadlines: The energy and tension of flow in knowledge work. , 2003 .

[50]  A. Bakker,et al.  Flow at Work: Evidence for an Upward Spiral of Personal and Organizational Resources* , 2006 .

[51]  P. Bliese.  Group Size, ICC Values, and Group-Level Correlations: A Simulation , 1998 .

[52]  L. James,et al.  rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. , 1993 .

[53]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[54]  E. Diener,et al.  Subjective well-being. The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. , 2000, The American psychologist.