Physical Models in Idea Generation: Hindrance or Help?

Engineering idea generation is a critical part of new product development and physical models are one tool used in this phase of design. Unfortunately, few guidelines about the effective use of physical models to support idea generation exist. The advantages and disadvantages of physical models need to be clarified so that engineers know when and where to implement them effectively. Previous literature indicates there is potential for design fixation on physical prototypes. This limits the solutions considered. In contrast, other recommendations encourage the extensive use of physical models and the psychological literature indicates that physical representations have the potential to lead to more feasible design by supporting designers’ mental models of physical phenomena. This study evaluates these questions with a between-subjects experiment with four conditions, sketching only, building, building & testing, and constrained sketching. No evidence for design fixation is observed. The results show that physical models supplement designers’ mental models, thereby leading to higher quality ideas (fraction of functional ideas). This result shows a potential way of improving designer’s innovation by strategically implementing fast and cheap prototyping methods.Copyright © 2010 by ASME

[1]  Henry Petroski,et al.  Invention by design: how engineers get from thought to thing , 1996 .

[2]  Bo T. Christensen,et al.  The role and impact of mental simulation in design , 2009 .

[3]  Charles Hill,et al.  What do Prototypes Prototype , 1997 .

[4]  Rosario Vidal,et al.  Effectiveness of the means of expression in creative problem-solving in design groups , 2004 .

[5]  Kenneth D. Forbus Qualitative Process Theory , 1984, Artif. Intell..

[6]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[7]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[8]  K. L. Edwards Product design: Practical methods for the systematic development of new products: Mike Baxter Chapman & Hall, 1995, ISBN 0-412-63230-6, 308pp, £24.99 , 1995 .

[9]  Jami J. Shah,et al.  Evaluation of idea generation methods for conceptual design: Effectiveness metrics and design of experiments , 2000 .

[10]  N. Maier Reasoning in humans. II. The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness. , 1931 .

[11]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  The Second Toyota Paradox: How Delaying Decisions Can Make Better Cars Faster , 1995 .

[12]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness , 2003 .

[13]  P. Johnson-Laird Mental models , 1989 .

[14]  E. Hutchins Cognition in the wild , 1995 .

[15]  Udo Lindemann,et al.  Effort-saving product representations in design—results of a questionnaire survey , 2001 .

[16]  Barbara G. Tabachnick,et al.  Experimental designs using ANOVA , 2006 .

[17]  Willett Kempton,et al.  Two Theories of Home Heat Control , 1986, Cogn. Sci..

[18]  R. Weisberg,et al.  Following the wrong footsteps: fixation effects of pictorial examples in a design problem-solving task. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  Kevin Otto,et al.  Product Design: Techniques in Reverse Engineering and New Product Development , 2000 .

[20]  David W. Rosen,et al.  Refined metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness , 2009 .