A framework for the geometric accuracy assessment of classified objects

European initiatives for data harmonization and the establishment of remote-sensing-based services aim at the production of up-to-date land-cover information according to generally valid standards for the accurate qualification of thematic classification results. This is particularly true since new satellite systems provide data of high temporal and geometric resolution. While methods for point-related thematic accuracy assessment have already been established for years, there is a need for a commonly accepted framework for the geometric quality of tematic maps. In this study, an open and extendable framework for the geometric accuracy assessment is presented. The workflow begins with the definition of basic geometric accuracy metrics, which are based on differences in area and position between samples of classified and reference objects. The combination of user-defined metrics enables both a geometric assessment of single objects as well as the total data set. In an example of thematically classified agricultural fields in a German test site, we finally show how object relations between classified and reference objects can be identified and how they affect the global accuracy assessment of the total data set.

[1]  Christian Heipke,et al.  CONCEPTS FOR INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL EVALUATION OF AUTOMATICALLY DELINEATED TREE TOPS , 2004 .

[2]  J. R. Jensen,et al.  An automatic region-based image segmentation algorithm for remote sensing applications , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[3]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Making better use of accuracy data in land change studies: Estimating accuracy and area and quantifying uncertainty using stratified estimation , 2013 .

[4]  Martin Volk,et al.  A pragmatic approach for soil erosion risk assessment within policy hierarchies , 2010 .

[5]  Dongmei Chen,et al.  Change detection from remotely sensed images: From pixel-based to object-based approaches , 2013 .

[6]  Martin Volk,et al.  The comparison index: A tool for assessing the accuracy of image segmentation , 2007, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[7]  R. Pontius,et al.  Accuracy Assessment for a Simulation Model of Amazonian Deforestation , 2007 .

[8]  Stephen V. Stehman,et al.  Selecting and interpreting measures of thematic classification accuracy , 1997 .

[9]  Lalit Kumar,et al.  Comparative assessment of the measures of thematic classification accuracy , 2007 .

[10]  Julien Radoux,et al.  Please Scroll down for Article International Journal of Geographical Information Science Thematic Accuracy Assessment of Geographic Object-based Image Classification Thematic Accuracy Assessment of Geographic Object-based Image Classification , 2022 .

[11]  P. Gong,et al.  Accuracy Assessment Measures for Object-based Image Segmentation Goodness , 2010 .

[12]  Geoffrey J. Hay,et al.  Object-based change detection , 2012 .

[13]  Dirk Tiede,et al.  Spatial and thematic assessment of object-based forest stand delineation using an OFA-matrix , 2012, Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinformation.

[14]  Michael J. Crawley,et al.  The R book , 2022 .

[15]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment , 2002 .

[16]  R. Colwell Remote sensing of the environment , 1980, Nature.

[17]  John W. Emerson,et al.  Nonparametric Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Discrete Null Distributions , 2011, R J..

[18]  SPATIAL DATA QUALITY CONTROL PROCESS BASED ON ISO , 2009 .

[19]  Hadley Wickham,et al.  The Split-Apply-Combine Strategy for Data Analysis , 2011 .

[20]  Wenzhong Shi,et al.  Quality assessment for geo‐spatial objects derived from remotely sensed data , 2005 .

[21]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  A Novel Protocol for Accuracy Assessment in Classification of Very High Resolution Images , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[22]  Erhard Diedrich,et al.  Earth observation data payload ground segments at DLR for GMES , 2008 .

[23]  R. Evans,et al.  Assessment and monitoring of accelerated water erosion of cultivated land – when will reality be acknowledged? , 2013 .

[24]  Fan Xia,et al.  Assessing object-based classification: advantages and limitations , 2009 .

[25]  P. Levelt,et al.  ESA's sentinel missions in support of Earth system science , 2012 .

[26]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Sample size determination for image classification accuracy assessment and comparison , 2009 .

[27]  Antti Jakobsson,et al.  Guidelines for Implementing the ISO 19100 Geographic Information Quality Standards in National Mapping and Cadastral Agencies , 2007 .

[28]  Olivier Thas,et al.  Comparing Distributions , 2009 .

[29]  Dong-Chen He,et al.  Automatic fuzzy object-based analysis of VHSR images for urban objects extraction , 2013 .

[30]  Thomas Blaschke,et al.  Object based image analysis for remote sensing , 2010 .