Second‐order computational homogenization of heterogeneous materials with periodic microstructure

A procedure for second-order computational homogenization of heterogeneous materials is derived from the unit cell homogenization, in which an appropriate representation of the micro-displacement field is assumed as the superposition of a local macroscopic displacement field, expressed in a polynomial form related to the macro-displacement field, and an unknown micro-fluctuation field accounting for the effects of the heterogeneities. This second contribution is represented as the superposition of two unknown functions each of which related to the first-order and to the second-order strain, respectively. This kinematical micro-macro framework guarantees that the micro-displacement field is continuous across the interfaces between adjacent unit cells and implies a computationally efficient procedure that applies in two steps. The first step corresponds to the standard homogenization, while the second step is based on the results of the first step and completes the second-order homogenization. Two multi-phase composites, a three-phase and a laminated composite, are analysed in the examples to assess the reliability of the homogenization techniques. The computational homogenization is carried out by a FE analysis of the unit cell; the overall elastic moduli and the characteristic lengths of the second-order equivalent continuum model are obtained. Finally, the simple shear of a constrained heterogeneous two-dimensional strip made up of the composites considered is analysed by considering a heterogeneous continuum and a homogenized second-order continuum; the corresponding results are compared and discussed in order to identify the validity limits of the proposed technique.

[1]  Nicolas Triantafyllidis,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF SCALE SIZE ON THE STABILITY OF PERIODIC SOLIDS AND THE ROLE OF ASSOCIATED HIGHER ORDER GRADIENT CONTINUUM MODELS , 1996 .

[2]  Patrick de Buhan,et al.  Multiphase approach as a generalized homogenization procedure for modelling the macroscopic behaviour of soils reinforced by linear inclusions , 2008 .

[3]  F. Feyel.  A multilevel finite element method (FE2) to describe the response of highly non-linear structures using generalized continua , 2003 .

[4]  Chris J. Pearce,et al.  Scale transition and enforcement of RVE boundary conditions in second‐order computational homogenization , 2008 .

[5]  Claude Boutin,et al.  Microstructural effects in elastic composites , 1996 .

[6]  V. Kouznetsova,et al.  Multi-scale second-order computational homogenization of multi-phase materials : a nested finite element solution strategy , 2004 .

[7]  Yoshihiro Tomita,et al.  A micromechanical approach of nonlocal modeling for media with periodic microstructures , 2008 .

[8]  Norman A. Fleck,et al.  Computational Evaluation of Strain Gradient Elasticity Constants , 2004 .

[9]  S. Forest,et al.  Cosserat overall modeling of heterogeneous materials , 1998 .

[10]  I. Jasiuk,et al.  A micromechanically based couple-stress model of an elastic orthotropic two-phase composite , 2002 .

[11]  A. Bacigalupo,et al.  NON-LOCAL COMPUTATIONAL HOMOGENIZATION OF PERIODIC MASONRY , 2011 .

[12]  P. Germain,et al.  The Method of Virtual Power in Continuum Mechanics. Part 2: Microstructure , 1973 .

[13]  Kirill Cherednichenko,et al.  On rigorous derivation of strain gradient effects in the overall behaviour of periodic heterogeneous media , 2000 .

[14]  P.J.G. Schreurs,et al.  Homogenization of heterogeneous polymers , 1999 .

[15]  Iwona M Jasiuk,et al.  A micromechanically based couple–stress model of an elastic two-phase composite , 2001 .

[16]  Bruno Sudret,et al.  Micropolar multiphase model for materials reinforced by linear inclusions , 2000 .