Assessment, validation and deployment strategy of a two-barcode protocol for facile genotyping of duckweed species.

Lemnaceae, commonly called duckweeds, comprise a diverse group of floating aquatic plants that have previously been classified into 37 species based on morphological and physiological criteria. In addition to their unique evolutionary position among angiosperms and their applications in biomonitoring, the potential of duckweeds as a novel sustainable crop for fuel and feed has recently increased interest in the study of their biodiversity and systematics. However, due to their small size and abbreviated structure, accurate typing of duckweeds based on morphology can be challenging. In the past decade, attempts to employ molecular barcoding techniques for species assignment have produced promising results; however, they have yet to be codified into a simple and quantitative protocol. A study that compiles and compares the barcode sequences within all known species of this family would help to establish the fidelity and limits of this DNA-based approach. In this work, we compared the level of conservation between over 100 strains of duckweed for two intergenic barcode sequences derived from the plastid genome. By using over 300 sequences publicly available in the NCBI database, we determined the utility of each of these two barcodes for duckweed species identification. Through sequencing of these barcodes from additional accessions, 30 of the 37 known species of duckweed could be identified with varying levels of confidence using this approach. From our analyses using this reference dataset, we also confirmed two instances where mis-assignment of species has likely occurred. Potential strategies for further improving the scope of this technology are discussed.

[1]  E. Lam,et al.  Telling duckweed apart: Genotyping technologies for the Lemnaceae , 2013 .

[2]  M. Nei,et al.  MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. , 2011, Molecular biology and evolution.

[3]  Joachim Messing,et al.  DNA barcoding of the Lemnaceae, a family of aquatic monocots , 2010, BMC Plant Biology.

[4]  M. Morikawa,et al.  Sustainable biodegradation of phenol by Acinetobacter calcoaceticus P23 isolated from the rhizosphere of duckweed Lemna aoukikusa. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  K. Appenroth,et al.  Genetic structure of the genus Lemna L. (Lemnaceae) as revealed by amplified fragment length polymorphism , 2010, Planta.

[6]  W. John Kress,et al.  A DNA barcode for land plants , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  S. Graham,et al.  Multiple Multilocus DNA Barcodes from the Plastid Genome Discriminate Plant Species Equally Well , 2008, PloS one.

[8]  V. Savolainen,et al.  A test of psbK-psbI and atpF-atpH as potential plant DNA barcodes using the flora of the Kruger National Park (South Africa) as a model system , 2008 .

[9]  Sylvie Duthoit,et al.  DNA barcoding the floras of biodiversity hotspots , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Nicolas Salamin,et al.  Land plants and DNA barcodes: short-term and long-term goals , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  D. Janzen,et al.  Use of DNA barcodes to identify flowering plants. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  Michael P. Cummings,et al.  PAUP* [Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (and Other Methods)] , 2004 .

[13]  David E. Konerding,et al.  An Essential Guide to the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool: BLAST , 2004 .

[14]  John P. Huelsenbeck,et al.  MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models , 2003, Bioinform..

[15]  J. Thompson,et al.  The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[16]  D. Les,et al.  Systematics of theLemnaceae (duckweeds): Inferences from micromolecular and morphological data , 1997, Plant Systematics and Evolution.

[17]  Jonathan D. G. Jones,et al.  Alkali treatment for rapid preparation of plant material for reliable PCR analysis. , 1993, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[18]  D. Les,et al.  BIOCHEMICAL HETEROPHYLLY AND FLAVONOID EVOLUTION IN NORTH AMERICAN POTAMOGETON (POTAMOGETONACEAE). , 1990, American journal of botany.

[19]  W. F. Thompson,et al.  Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. , 1980, Nucleic acids research.

[20]  J. Farris,et al.  Quantitative Phyletics and the Evolution of Anurans , 1969 .

[21]  J. W. McClure,et al.  A chemotaxonomic study of Lemnaceae. , 1966, American journal of botany.

[22]  K. Appenroth,et al.  Relative in vitro growth rates of duckweeds (Lemnaceae) - the most rapidly growing higher plants. , 2015, Plant biology.

[23]  K. Appenroth,et al.  Genetic characterization and barcoding of taxa in the genus Wolffia Horkel ex Schleid. (Lemnaceae) as revealed by two plastidic markers and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) , 2012, Planta.

[24]  Ian Korf,et al.  BLAST - an essential guide to the basic local alignment search tool , 2003 .

[25]  David Posada,et al.  MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution , 1998, Bioinform..