Outcomes of accepting or declining advanced placement Calculus credit

Students who qualify for Calculus credit via the Advanced Placement (AP) exam often have the choice of accepting the credit, and starting in Calculus II or III, or declining the credit, and retaking Calculus I in a university setting. This study investigates and reports success metrics for students who make a choice of accepting or declining AP Calculus credit. The 2014 College Board National Report states when compared to similar peers, students who receive a score of 3 or higher in an AP exam tend to earn higher college grade point averages (GPAs), have higher graduation rates, and have the opportunity to take more discipline course work in college. This report is based on all the AP courses offered by College Board. It is not certain what the outcomes are for an individual course, i.e. AP Calculus, or how the markers of success translate to engineering students and engineering programs. By analyzing 3,600 engineering students academic records from Fall 2012 and 2014 (i.e. gender, ethnicity, residency, grade received in Calculus I course, AP Calculus exam score, High School GPA, SAT/ACT Math and Verbal score), this study seeks to describe patterns of success in students' subsequent Calculus courses from those who accepted AP Calculus credit, skipping Calculus I, as opposed to those who did not accept their AP Calculus credit and took Calculus I. Students ask for recommendations from their first year engineering advisors on whether to retake Calculus I in college or accept their AP Calculus credit, which consists of a score of 4 or 5 at this university. As research in this specific topic is absent, advisors in a first year engineering program must advise in the absence of concrete data. This paper offers insight based upon previous student academic records, which may inform advisors and incoming first year students on whether or not to accept AP Calculus credit.

[1]  Rick Morgan,et al.  ADVANCED PLACEMENT STUDENTS IN COLLEGE: AN INVESTIGATION OF COURSE GRADES AT 21 COLLEGES , 1998 .

[2]  Peter S. Arcidiacono,et al.  Race and College Success: Evidence from Missouri , 2013 .

[3]  A Closer Examination of the Academic Benefits of AP , 2013 .

[4]  Clive Belfield,et al.  Predicting Success in College: The Importance of Placement Tests and High School Transcripts , 2012 .

[5]  Dan Budny,et al.  Assessment of the Impact of Freshman Engineering Courses * , 1998 .

[6]  Zoran Bursac,et al.  Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression , 2008, Source Code for Biology and Medicine.

[7]  P. Ackerman,et al.  High School Advanced Placement and Student Performance in College: STEM Majors, Non-STEM Majors, and Gender Differences , 2013 .

[8]  Emily J. Shaw,et al.  Exploring the Utility of Advanced Placement Participation and Performance in College Admission Decisions , 2013 .

[9]  John A. Ross,et al.  The Gender Confidence Gap in Fractions Knowledge: Gender Differences in Student Belief-Achievement Relationships , 2012 .

[10]  Robert H. Tai,et al.  Advanced Placement Exam Scores as a Predictor of Performance in Introductory College Biology, Chemistry and Physics Courses. , 2007 .

[11]  Wayne J. Camara,et al.  The SAT[R] I and High School Grades: Utility in Predicting Success in College. Research Notes. , 2000 .

[12]  L. Barnard‐Brak,et al.  Advanced Placement Course Enrollment and School-Level Characteristics , 2011 .

[13]  E. Howe ‘Untangling Sickle-cell Anemia and the Teaching of Heterozygote Protection’ , 2007 .

[14]  H. Hendy,et al.  Measurement of math beliefs and their associations with math behaviors in college students. , 2014, Psychological assessment.