Cultural Proximity and Audience Behavior: The Role of Language in Patterns of Polarization and Multicultural Fluency

Cultural proximity is a multidimensional concept, most often used to explain media preferences across national boundaries. The present study extends the construct, revealing its power to explain audience formation within a multicultural society. Portable People Meter data from Arbitron, Inc., was used to compare patterns of television and radio use across Spanish-speaking Hispanics, English-speaking Hispanics, and non-Hispanics in Houston, Texas. The results indicate that language preferences play a powerful role in determining audience behavior. Furthermore, while English-speaking Hispanics exhibit multicultural fluency, the other two populations show evidence of cultural polarization.

[1]  Herbert I. Schiller,et al.  Mass communications and American empire , 1971 .

[2]  B. J. C. Falkenheim.  Asymmetries Reconfigured: South American Television Flows in the 1990s , 2000 .

[3]  Steven S. Wildman,et al.  International trade in films and television programs , 1988 .

[4]  J. G. Webster.  Beneath the Veneer of Fragmentation: Television Audience Polarization in a Multichannel World , 2005 .

[5]  C. Sunstein.  Republic.com , 2001 .

[6]  Joseph D. Straubhaar.  Beyond media imperialism: Assymetrical interdependence and cultural proximity , 1991 .

[7]  Roger Cooper,et al.  The status and future of audience duplication research: An assessment of ratings‐based theories of audience behavior , 1996 .

[8]  Andrew Ehrenberg,et al.  The television audience : patterns of viewing : an update , 1987 .

[9]  S. Waisbord,et al.  Media and globalization : why the state matters , 2001 .

[10]  James G. Webster,et al.  The Mass Audience: Rediscovering the Dominant Model , 1996 .

[11]  Joseph D. Straubhaar,et al.  Multiple Proximities between Television Genres and Audiences , 2005, Gazette (Leiden, Netherlands).

[12]  D. Holt.  Does Cultural Capital Structure American Consumption , 1998 .

[13]  Andrew Ehrenberg,et al.  The reach of TV channels , 1984 .

[14]  Descriptors Higher.  Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association , 1974 .

[15]  J. G. Webster.  Audience Flow Past and Present: Television Inheritance Effects Reconsidered , 2006 .

[16]  James G. Webster,et al.  Ratings analysis: The theory and practice of audience research , 2006 .

[17]  Todd Gitlin.  Public sphere or public sphericules , 2002 .

[18]  Joseph D. Straubhaar.  World Television: From Global to Local , 2007 .

[19]  P. Bourdieu.  Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* , 2018, Food and Culture.

[20]  K. A. Hill,et al.  Language as a Variable: English, Spanish, Ethnicity, and Political Opinion Polling in South Florida , 2001 .

[21]  David Waterman,et al.  Hollywood's Road to Riches , 2005 .

[22]  R. Suro.  The Rise of the Second Generation: Changing Patterns in Hispanic Population Growth , 2003 .

[23]  R. Peterson,et al.  CHANGING HIGHBROW TASTE: FROM SNOB TO OMNIVORE* , 1996 .