Influences of melting method on fused iron catalysts for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis

The impact of melting method on the performance of fused iron catalysts for the Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis (FTS) has been investigated. Characterization technologies including ICP, XRD, H2-TPR, CO-TPD, and Mossbauer effect spectroscopy (MES) were used to study the bulk phase composition, and reduction and adsorption behaviors. The syngas conversion and CH4 selectivity of AAW was very similar to a commercial fused Fe catalyst reported by Sasol, slightly better than OT, but much better than IF. The much inferior IF catalyst was attributed to contamination with Al (Si) from the container, as the melting pool leached the wall of the crucible severely. The introduction of Al (Si) resulted in the formation of an irreducible FeAl2O4 (Fe2SiO4) phase that resisted carburation, thus IF exhibited the lowest content of active carbide. Both AAW and OT were excluded from this effect, since no crucible was adopted during fusion. The OT catalyst appeared mainly in the wustite phase (FeO), showing slightly lower reducibility and higher abundance in supermagnetic Fe3+ or Fe2+ than AAW. The slightly negative performance of OT compared with AAW might be attributed to a lower extent of reduction originated from a difference in crystal lattice type, which led to a difference in both lattice defects and the solubility of exterior ions. The AAW catalyst, composed of mainly magnetite phase (Fe3O4) besides a trace amount of FeO, was reduced in steps and formed two active sites. The spent catalyst possessed the largest carbide content, which correlated well with its high activity and olefin selectivity. In addition, the AAW might benefit from the mixing precursor (Fe3O4 plus a small amount of FeO) that brought out assorted active sites.

[1]  B. Zong,et al.  Rapidly Quenched Skeletal Fe-Based Catalysts for Fischer—Tropsch Synthesis , 2008 .

[2]  Burtron H. Davis,et al.  Fischer−Tropsch Synthesis: Comparison of Performances of Iron and Cobalt Catalysts , 2007 .

[3]  H. Hayakawa,et al.  Preparation of a new precipitated iron catalyst for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis , 2007 .

[4]  Chenghua Zhang,et al.  Study on Fe–Al2O3 interaction over precipitated iron catalyst for Fischer–Tropsch synthesis , 2007 .

[5]  H. Xiang,et al.  Effects of SiO2 and Al2O3 on performances of iron-basedcatalysts for slurry Fischer–Tropsch synthesis , 2007 .

[6]  N. Koizumi,et al.  Phase transformation of unpromoted and promoted Fe catalysts and the formation of carbonaceous compounds during Fischer–Tropsch synthesis reaction , 2006 .

[7]  M. Dry,et al.  Present and future applications of the Fischer–Tropsch process , 2004 .

[8]  D. Bukur,et al.  Highly active and stable iron Fischer-Tropsch catalyst for synthesis gas conversion to liquid fuels , 1999 .

[9]  M. Muhler,et al.  Effect of Potassium on the Kinetics of Ammonia Synthesis and Decomposition over Fused Iron Catalyst at Atmospheric Pressure , 1997 .

[10]  Xiaonian Li,et al.  Development of novel low temperature and low pressure ammonia synthesis catalyst , 1996 .

[11]  E. Iglesia,et al.  Selective synthesis of α-olefins on Fe-Zn Fischer-Tropsch catalysts , 1995 .

[12]  D. Bukur,et al.  Binder/support effects on the activity and selectivity of iron catalysts in the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis , 1990 .

[13]  Alexis T. Bell,et al.  Studies of fischer-Tropsch synthesis over a fused iron catalyst , 1986 .

[14]  C. Satterfield,et al.  Some kinetic design considerations in the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis on a reduced fused-magnetite catalyst , 1984 .

[15]  G. Ertl,et al.  Interaction of Co with an Fe(111) surface , 1984 .

[16]  M. Dry.  Catalytic aspects of industrial Fischer-Tropsch synthesis , 1982 .

[17]  J. Benziger,et al.  The effects of carbon, oxygen, sulfur and potassium adlayers on CO and H2 adsorption on Fe(100) , 1980 .

[18]  M. Dry,et al.  The correlation between catalyst surface basicity and hydrocarbon selectivity in the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis , 1968 .

[19]  M. Dry.  Chapter 7 – FT catalysts , 2004 .