Mid-term Procedural and Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Paravalvular Leak Closure With the Occlutech Paravalvular Leak Device.

AIMS To assess the efficacy and safety of the Occlutech Paravalvular Leak Device (PLD) for the percutaneous closure of paravalvular leaks (PVL). METHODS AND RESULTS Patients with PVL were enrolled at 21 sites from 9 countries. Indications for PVL closure were heart failure and/or hemolytic anemia. Endpoint measures were changes in PV regurgitation grade, NYHA class and requirement for hemolysis-related transfusion. One-hundred thirty-six patients with mitral (67.6%) or aortic (32.4%) leaks were included (mean age 66.7 years, 58% men). Thirty-one percent had multiple PVLs. The proportion of patients with NYHA III/IV decreased from 77.3% at baseline to 16.9% at latest follow-up. The proportion of patients with need for hemolysis-related blood transfusion decreased from 36.8% to 5.9% and 8.3% to 0% for ML patients and AL patients, respectively. All cause mortality was 7.4%. Complications included interference with valve leaflets (0.7%), transient device embolization (percutaneously solved) (0.7%), late device embolization (0.7%), recurrent hemolytic anemia (2.2%), new onset hemolytic anemia (0.7%), valve surgery (2.2%), need for repeat closure (0.7%), complications at femoral puncture site (0.7%) and arrythmias requiring treatment (4.4%). CONCLUSIONS PVL closure with the Occlutech PLD demonstrated high success rate associated with significant clinical improvement and a relatively low rate of serious complications.

[1]  J. Leipsic,et al.  Clinical Trial Principles and Endpoint Definitions for Paravalvular Leaks in Surgical Prosthesis , 2018, European heart journal.

[2]  D. Hagler,et al.  Successful Percutaneous Mitral Paravalvular Leak Closure Is Associated With Improved Midterm Survival , 2017, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[3]  G. Davidavičius,et al.  Fusion of real-time 3D transesophageal echocardiography and cardiac fluoroscopy imaging in transapical catheter-based mitral paravalvular leak closure , 2017, Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology.

[4]  A. Íñiguez,et al.  Outcomes and predictors of success and complications for paravalvular leak closure: an analysis of the SpanisH real-wOrld paravalvular LEaks closure (HOLE) registry. , 2017, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[5]  D. Hagler,et al.  Techniques and Outcomes of Percutaneous Aortic Paravalvular Leak Closure. , 2016, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[6]  I. Cruz-González,et al.  Transcatheter closure of paravalvular leaks: state of the art , 2016, Netherlands Heart Journal.

[7]  Matthew J. Daniels,et al.  Percutaneous Device Closure of Paravalvular Leak: Combined Experience From the United Kingdom and Ireland. , 2016, Circulation.

[8]  T. Roleder,et al.  Transcatheter closure of paravalvular leaks using a paravalvular leak device – a prospective Polish registry , 2016, Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology.

[9]  A. Rivera,et al.  Two‐Year Follow Up After Surgical Versus Percutaneous Paravalvular Leak Closure: A Non‐Randomized Analysis , 2016, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[10]  M. Ergelen,et al.  Early experience of percutaneous paravalvular leak closure using a novel Occlutech occluder. , 2016, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[11]  E. Tuzcu,et al.  Catheter-based closure of paravalvular leak , 2014, Expert review of cardiovascular therapy.

[12]  S. Lévesque,et al.  Percutaneous paravalvular leak reduction: procedural and long-term clinical outcomes. , 2013, The Canadian journal of cardiology.

[13]  Itzhak Kronzon,et al.  Clinical outcomes in patients undergoing percutaneous closure of periprosthetic paravalvular leaks. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  D. Hagler,et al.  Long-term follow-up of percutaneous repair of paravalvular prosthetic regurgitation. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  D. Hagler,et al.  Percutaneous Repair of Paravalvular Prosthetic Regurgitation: Acute and 30-Day Outcomes in 115 Patients , 2011, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.

[16]  Bijoy K Khandheria,et al.  Recommendations for evaluation of prosthetic valves with echocardiography and doppler ultrasound: a report From the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Task Force on Prosthetic Valves, developed in conjunction with the American College of Cardiology Card , 2009, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[17]  S. Yuan,et al.  Displacement of the Amplatzer occluder device from the mitral paraprosthetic leak. , 2008, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[18]  J. F. Keane,et al.  Transcatheter umbrella closure of valvular and paravalvular leaks. , 1992, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  G. Davidavičius,et al.  Occlutech® Paravalvular Leak Device (PLD) , 2017 .