An Internet-Based Hearing Test for Simple Audiometry in Nonclinical Settings: Preliminary Validation and Proof of Principle

Objective: To investigate the validity and reproducibility of a newly developed internet-based self-administered hearing test using clinical pure-tone air-conducted audiometry as gold standard. Study Design: Cross-sectional intrasubject comparative study. Setting: Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden. Patients: Seventy-two participants (79% women) with mean age of 45 years (range, 19-71 yr). Twenty participants had impaired hearing according to the gold standard test. Interventions: Hearing tests. Main Outcome Measures: The Pearson correlation coefficient between the results of the studied Internet-based hearing test and the gold standard test, the greatest mean differences in decibel between the 2 tests over tested frequencies, sensitivity and specificity to diagnose hearing loss defined by Heibel-Lidén, and test-retest reproducibility with the Pearson correlation coefficient. Results: The Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.94 (p < 0.0001) for the right ear and 0.93 for the left (p = 0.0001). The greatest mean differences were seen for the frequencies 2 and 4 kHz, with -5.6 dB (standard deviation, 8.29), and -5.1 dB (standard deviation, 6.9), respectively. The 75th percentiles of intraindividual test-gold standard differences did not exceed -10 dB for any of the frequencies. The sensitivity for hearing loss was 75% (95% confidence interval, 51%-90%), and the specificity was 96% (95% confidence interval, 86%-99%). The test-retest reproducibility was excellent, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.99 (p < 0.0001) for both ears. Conclusion: It is possible to assess hearing with reasonable accuracy using an Internet-based hearing test on a personal computer with headphones. The practical viability of self-administration in participants' homes needs further evaluation.

[1]  I. Klockhoff,et al.  A method for computerized classification of pure tone screening audiometry results in noise-exposed groups. , 1973, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[2]  R S Tyler,et al.  A comparison of manual methods for measuring hearing levels. , 1980, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[3]  P. F. Gross,et al.  The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care , 1989, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[4]  D L Sackett,et al.  The rational clinical examination. A primer on the precision and accuracy of the clinical examination. , 1992, JAMA.

[5]  A. Davis,et al.  Hearing in adults : the prevalence and distribution of hearing impairment and reported hearing disability in the MRC Institute of Hearing Research's National Study of Hearing , 1995 .

[6]  S. Aw The World Health Organization's Programme for the Prevention of Deafness and Hearing Impairment. , 1997 .

[7]  Å. W. Smith The World Health Organization's Programme for the Prevention of Deafness and Hearing Impairment. , 1997, Scandinavian audiology. Supplementum.

[8]  Hans M Borchgrevink,et al.  Hearing loss induced by noise, ear infections, and head injuries: results from the Nord-Trøndelag Hearing Loss Study: Hipoacusia inducida por ruido, infecciones de oído y lesiones cefálicas: resultados del estudio Nord-Trøndelag sobre pérdidas auditivas , 2003, International journal of audiology.

[9]  Suely Rozenfeld,et al.  Triagem auditiva em idosos: comparação entre auto-relato e audiometria , 2005 .

[10]  R. Eavey,et al.  Evaluation of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Young People Using a Web-Based Survey Technique , 2005, Pediatrics.

[11]  S. Rozenfeld,et al.  Auditory screening in the elderly: comparison between self-report and audiometry , 2005, Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology.

[12]  T. Houtgast,et al.  How we do it: The Dutch functional hearing–screening tests by telephone and internet , 2006, Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery.

[13]  Mark E Lutman,et al.  Survey of mobile phone use and their chronic effects on the hearing of a student population. , 2007, International journal of audiology.

[14]  Ilmari Pyykkö,et al.  Occupational Noise, Smoking, and a High Body Mass Index are Risk Factors for Age-related Hearing Impairment and Moderate Alcohol Consumption is Protective: A European Population-based Multicenter Study , 2008, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.