An estimator for pairwise relatedness using molecular markers.

I propose a new estimator for jointly estimating two-gene and four-gene coefficients of relatedness between individuals from an outbreeding population with data on codominant genetic markers and compare it, by Monte Carlo simulations, to previous ones in precision and accuracy for different distributions of population allele frequencies, numbers of alleles per locus, actual relationships, sample sizes, and proportions of relatives included in samples. In contrast to several previous estimators, the new estimator is well behaved and applies to any number of alleles per locus and any allele frequency distribution. The estimates for two- and four-gene coefficients of relatedness from the new estimator are unbiased irrespective of the sample size and have sampling variances decreasing consistently with an increasing number of alleles per locus to the minimum asymptotic values determined by the variation in identity-by-descent among loci per se, regardless of the actual relationship. The new estimator is also robust for small sample sizes and for unknown relatives being included in samples for estimating allele frequencies. Compared to previous estimators, the new one is generally advantageous, especially for highly polymorphic loci and/or small sample sizes.

[1]  E. Thompson A restriction on. the space of genetic relationships , 1976, Annals of human genetics.

[2]  Kermit Ritland,et al.  Estimators for pairwise relatedness and individual inbreeding coefficients , 1996 .

[3]  K. Ritland,et al.  A novel method for estimating heritability using molecular markers , 1998, Heredity.

[4]  E A Thompson,et al.  The estimation of pairwise relationships , 1975, Annals of human genetics.

[5]  E Matthysen,et al.  A comparison of microsatellite‐based pairwise relatedness estimators , 2001, Molecular ecology.

[6]  S WRIGHT,et al.  Genetical structure of populations. , 1950, Nature.

[7]  Bette A. Loiselle,et al.  Spatial genetic structure of a tropical understory shrub, PSYCHOTRIA OFFICINALIS (RuBIACEAE) , 1995 .

[8]  M. Lynch,et al.  Estimation of pairwise relatedness with molecular markers. , 1999, Genetics.

[9]  M. Lynch,et al.  Estimation of relatedness by DNA fingerprinting. , 1988, Molecular biology and evolution.

[10]  K. Ritland Marker‐inferred relatedness as a tool for detecting heritability in nature , 2000, Molecular ecology.

[11]  W. G. Hill,et al.  Estimating quantitative genetic parameters using sibships reconstructed from marker data. , 2000, Genetics.

[12]  D E Weeks,et al.  Similarity of DNA fingerprints due to chance and relatedness. , 1993, Human heredity.

[13]  Kermit Ritland,et al.  A MARKER‐BASED METHOD FOR INFERENCES ABOUT QUANTITATIVE INHERITANCE IN NATURAL POPULATIONS , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[14]  D. Queller,et al.  Computer software for performing likelihood tests of pedigree relationship using genetic markers , 1999, Molecular ecology.

[15]  T. C. Marshall,et al.  Statistical confidence for likelihood‐based paternity inference in natural populations , 1998, Molecular ecology.

[16]  D. Queller,et al.  ESTIMATING RELATEDNESS USING GENETIC MARKERS , 1989, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.