Algorithm for radiation dose reduction with helical dual source coronary computed tomography angiography in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND Strategies to reduce the radiation dose of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA), while maintaining diagnostic image quality, are imperative for cardiac CT. OBJECTIVE We aimed to reduce radiation dose during helical dual-source CCTA by combining lower tube voltage, shortest possible full tube current (FTC) window, and minimal tube current outside the FTC window, and to develop a patient-based algorithm for applying these dose-reduction components. METHODS We compared FTC at 70% of the cardiac cycle (FTC70) to a 45% to 75% window (FTC45-75) using both 100 and 120 kVp (N=118). FTC70 was used in patients with heart rates <70 beats/min, no arrhythmia, age <65 years; 100 kVp was used in patients with body mass index (BMI) <30, a low coronary calcium score (CCS), and no stents. Objective and subjective image quality were assessed. RESULTS Compared with FTC45-75 at 120 kVp, radiation dose was reduced by 66% for FTC70 at 100 kVp (mean radiation dose: 4.4 +/- 0.9 mSv) and by 43% for FTC70 at 120 kVp. 99% of 780 segments in the FTC70 group were of diagnostic quality. Noise, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio were comparable between FTC70 and FTC45-75 for both 100 and 120 kVp. BMI, CCS and maximal heart rate variation were predictors of image quality. Tube voltage, FTC window width, scan length, and average heart rate were predictors of radiation dose. CONCLUSIONS A successful patient-based algorithm for radiation dose reduction during helical CCTA using DSCT has been developed and validated in clinical practice.

[1]  S. Abbara,et al.  Prospectively Gated Transverse Coronary CT Angiography versus Retrospectively Gated Helical Technique: Improved Image Quality and Reduced Radiation Dose , 2008 .

[2]  Bernd Hamm,et al.  Image Quality of Noninvasive Coronary Angiography Using Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography and Electron-beam Computed Tomography: Intraindividual Comparison in an Animal Model , 2004, Investigative radiology.

[3]  Borut Marincek,et al.  Radiation dose estimates in dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography , 2008, European Radiology.

[4]  W. Kalender,et al.  Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography--initial experience. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[5]  D. Dey,et al.  Image quality and artifacts in coronary CT angiography with dual-source CT: initial clinical experience. , 2008, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[6]  K. Stierstorfer,et al.  First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system , 2006, European Radiology.

[7]  Borut Marincek,et al.  Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control , 2006, European Radiology.

[8]  Randall C. Thompson,et al.  Radiation Dose to Patients From Cardiac Diagnostic Imaging , 2007, Circulation.

[9]  Simon Wildermuth,et al.  Low kilovoltage cardiac dual-source CT: attenuation, noise, and radiation dose , 2008, European Radiology.

[10]  D. Dey,et al.  Dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with atrial fibrillation: initial experience. , 2008, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[11]  E. Wenkel,et al.  Comparison of Image Quality in Contrast-enhanced Coronary-artery Visualization by Electron Beam Tomography and Retrospectively Electrocardiogram-gated Multislice Spiral Computed Tomography , 2003, Investigative radiology.

[12]  D. Dey,et al.  Predicting success of prospective and retrospective gating with dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography: development of selection criteria and initial experience. , 2008, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[13]  C. Claussen,et al.  Noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography in an unselected patient collective: effect of heart rate, heart rate variability and coronary calcifications on image quality and diagnostic accuracy. , 2008, European journal of radiology.

[14]  Jörg Hausleiter,et al.  Radiation Dose Estimates From Cardiac Multislice Computed Tomography in Daily Practice: Impact of Different Scanning Protocols on Effective Dose Estimates , 2006, Circulation.

[15]  A. Einstein,et al.  Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography. , 2007, JAMA.

[16]  R. Frye,et al.  A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. , 1975, Circulation.

[17]  Rainer Raupach,et al.  Dose performance of a 64-channel dual-source CT scanner. , 2007, Radiology.

[18]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Image Quality and Reconstruction Intervals of Dual-Source CT Coronary Angiography: Recommendations for ECG-Pulsing Windowing , 2007, Investigative radiology.

[19]  Simon Wildermuth,et al.  Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. , 2006, Radiology.

[20]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[21]  Fuminari Tatsugami,et al.  Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. , 2007, European heart journal.

[22]  R. Detrano,et al.  Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.