Using Continuous Improvement to Enhance an Online Course

Assessment is becoming important from many different perspectives. Universities are planning, developing, and testing various assessment models to satisfy stakeholders. Many accrediting agencies are also requiring assessment plans and their implementation from universities for reaccreditation. This article describes how assessment was used to continuously improve a database course in a Web MBA program, and combines Deming's Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle with Bloom's taxonomy to develop rubrics for problem solving learning objectives in an online course. Results from direct and indirect measurements are used to improve the course. Specifically, two semester results are compared for course assessment. Results show some improvement; however, the course requires continuous improvement to meet benchmarks. The model presented here is generic in nature and should be useful for all educators who plan to initiate or continue the assessment and continuous improvement process. Instead of reinventing the wheel, educators can learn from our experiences and use the results as a starting point for their own assessment programs.

[1]  Michael J. Fry,et al.  Teaching Problem Solving Techniques to MBA Students Through Supply Chain Management , 2008, INFORMS Trans. Educ..

[2]  Bridget D. Arend Course assessment practices and student learning strategies in online college courses , 2007 .

[3]  Janice L. Ammons,et al.  Course‐Embedded Assessments for Evaluating Cross‐Functional Integration and Improving the Teaching‐Learning Process , 2005 .

[4]  Clyde W. Holsapple,et al.  Defining, Assessing, and Promoting E‐Learning Success: An Information Systems Perspective* , 2006 .

[5]  W. Popham What's Wrong--and What's Right--with Rubrics. , 1997 .

[6]  Donald Farmer Course-Embedded Assessment: A Catalyst for Realizing the Paradigm Shift from Teaching to Learning. , 1999 .

[7]  Cecilia Temponi,et al.  Continuous improvement framework: implications for academia , 2005 .

[8]  Hassan M. Selim Ahmed,et al.  Hybrid E-Learning Acceptance Model: Learner Perceptions. , 2010 .

[9]  Delvin Grant,et al.  Quality management in US higher education , 2002 .

[10]  Karen T. Cascini,et al.  Developing Critical Thinking Skills In The Intermediate Accounting Class: Using Simulations With Rubrics , 2011 .

[11]  Delvin Grant,et al.  Quality management applied to higher education , 2000 .

[12]  An Alternative Method in the New Educational Program from the Point of Performance-Based Assessment: Rubric Scoring Scales , 2007 .

[13]  R. Leach The learning curve , 1992 .

[14]  Sandra C. Jones Measuring the Quality of Higher Education: linking teaching quality measures at the delivery level to administrative measures at the university level , 2003 .

[15]  Anil K. Aggarwal,et al.  Quality management applied to web-based courses , 2006 .

[16]  Robert Bill,et al.  Facilitating interactions through structured web-based bulletin boards: A quasi-experimental study on promoting learners' critical thinking skills , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[17]  M. Simon,et al.  What's still wrong with rubrics: Focusing on the consistency of performance criteria across scale levels , 2004 .

[19]  Mark P. Sharfman,et al.  Does Decision Process Matter? A Study Of Strategic Decision-making Effectiveness , 1996 .

[20]  Mile Terziovski,et al.  Quality management practices and their relationship with customer satisfaction and productivity improvement , 2006 .

[21]  Maria Pampaka,et al.  Assessing Students' Learning in MIS using Concept Mapping , 2009, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[22]  Ellen Stevens,et al.  The Role of Rubrics in Advancing and Assessing Student Learning , 2007 .

[23]  R. Nat Natarajan,et al.  APPLYING QFD TO INTERNAL SERVICE SYSTEM DESIGN , 1999 .

[24]  Susan Daniels Agency files away inefficiency, saves taxpayers a bundle , 2007 .

[25]  Dusya Vera,et al.  Enhancing Knowledge Transfer in Classroom Versus Online Settings: The Interplay Among Instructor, Student, Content, and Context , 2009 .

[26]  Gopal K. Kanji,et al.  A comparative study of quality practices in higher education institutions in the US and Malaysia , 1999 .

[27]  Randy V. Bradley,et al.  Methods of Instruction and Learning Outcomes: A Theoretical Analysis of Two Approaches in an Introductory Information Technology Course* , 2010 .

[28]  Gopal K. Kanji,et al.  Total quality management in UK higher education institutions , 1999 .

[29]  Jeffrey S. Harper,et al.  Assurance of Learning in the MIS Program. , 2009 .