Effect of flapping orientation on caudal fin propelled bio-inspired underwater robots

Aquatic animals and mammals in nature, in particular, the Body and/or Caudal Fin (BCF) swimmers swim either by flapping their fins in the sideways direction or the dorso-ventral direction. Not much literature is available on the effects of the performance of these robots based on the choice of its flapping orientation. In this research, it is found that dorso-ventral flapping could lead to better self-stabilizing effects and lesser energy consumption compared to sideways flapping. It is also found that the choice of dorso-ventral flapping offers the possibility of controlling the body’s oscillation amplitude while flapping. This is an appealing advantage for underwater surveying robots carrying cameras and sensors as controlled body oscillations could yield better results from its payloads. The main body of results is obtained with simulations for underwater vehicle dynamics with the coefficients of the REMUS underwater vehicle, while stability analysis for a generalised case is also presented.

[1]  Timothy Prestero,et al.  Verification of a six-degree of freedom simulation model for the REMUS autonomous underwater vehicle , 2001 .

[2]  George V Lauder,et al.  Fish locomotion: recent advances and new directions. , 2015, Annual review of marine science.

[3]  R. Ganguli,et al.  Studies to improve the actuation capability of low-frequency IPMC actuators for underwater robotic applications , 2019, ISSS Journal of Micro and Smart Systems.

[4]  Kyu-Jin Cho,et al.  Review of biomimetic underwater robots using smart actuators , 2012 .

[5]  George V Lauder,et al.  Center of mass motion in swimming fish: effects of speed and locomotor mode during undulatory propulsion. , 2014, Zoology.

[6]  Daniel Weihs,et al.  Stability versus Maneuvering: Challenges for Stability during Swimming by Fishes. , 2015, Integrative and comparative biology.

[7]  Fernando Seco Granja,et al.  Indoor pedestrian navigation using an INS/EKF framework for yaw drift reduction and a foot-mounted IMU , 2010, 2010 7th Workshop on Positioning, Navigation and Communication.

[8]  George V. Lauder,et al.  Function of the Caudal Fin During Locomotion in Fishes: Kinematics, Flow Visualization, and Evolutionary Patterns1 , 2000 .

[9]  Daniela Rus,et al.  Exploration of underwater life with an acoustically controlled soft robotic fish , 2018, Science Robotics.

[10]  Prabhu Rajagopal,et al.  Analysis of biomimetic caudal fin shapes for optimal propulsive efficiency , 2018 .

[11]  George V Lauder,et al.  Forces, fishes, and fluids: hydrodynamic mechanisms of aquatic locomotion. , 2002, News in physiological sciences : an international journal of physiology produced jointly by the International Union of Physiological Sciences and the American Physiological Society.

[12]  Weishan Chen,et al.  Effect of head swing motion on hydrodynamic performance of fishlike robot propulsion , 2016 .

[13]  Michael V. Cook,et al.  Flight Dynamics Principles: A Linear Systems Approach to Aircraft Stability and Control , 2007 .

[14]  F. Fish Secondary Evolution of Aquatic Propulsion in Higher Vertebrates: Validation and Prospect. , 2016, Integrative and comparative biology.

[15]  F.E. Fish,et al.  Structure and mechanics of nonpiscine control surfaces , 2004, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[16]  Paul W. Webb,et al.  Stability and Maneuverability , 2005 .

[17]  Ningyu Li,et al.  Numerical study on the hydrodynamics of thunniform bio-inspired swimming under self-propulsion , 2017, PloS one.