Social cues in multimedia learning: Role of speaker's voice.

In 2 experiments, learners who were seated at a computer workstation received a narrated animation about lightning formation. Then, they took a retention test, took a transfer test, and rated the speaker. There was a voice effect, in which students performed better on the transfer test and rated the speaker more positively if the voice in the narration had a standard accent rather than a foreign accent (Experiment 1) and if the voice was human rather than machine synthesized (Experiment 2). The retention test results were mixed. The results are consistent with social agency theory, which posits that social cues in multimedia messages can encourage learners to interpret human-computer interactions as more similar to human-to-human conversation. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)

[1]  H. Grice.  Logic and conversation , 1975 .

[2]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Educational Outcomes of Tutoring: A Meta-analysis of Findings , 1982 .

[3]  R. Hopper,et al.  Measuring Language Attitudes: The Speech Evaluation Instrument , 1985 .

[4]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction , 1991 .

[5]  Fred G. W. C. Paas,et al.  The Efficiency of Instructional Conditions: An Approach to Combine Mental Effort and Performance Measures , 1992 .

[6]  Joseph P. Magliano,et al.  Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring , 1995 .

[7]  Gregory Schraw,et al.  Readers' implicit models of reading , 1996 .

[8]  Margaret G. McKeown,et al.  Questioning the Author: A Yearlong Classroom Implementation to Engage Students with Text , 1996, The Elementary School Journal.

[9]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[10]  R. Mayer,et al.  A Split-Attention Effect in Multimedia Learning: Evidence for Dual Processing Systems in Working Memory , 1998 .

[11]  Brent A. Olde,et al.  Who said what? Source memory for narrator and character agents in literary short stories. , 1999 .

[12]  W. Lewis Johnson,et al.  Animated Agents for Procedural Training in Virtual Reality: Perception, Cognition, and Motor Control , 1999, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[13]  James C. Lester,et al.  Deictic Believability: Coordinated Gesture, Locomotion, and Speech in Lifelike Pedagogical Agents , 1999, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[14]  John Sweller,et al.  Instructional Design in Technical Areas , 1999 .

[15]  R. Mayer,et al.  Engaging students in active learning: The case for personalized multimedia messages. , 2000 .

[16]  J. Cassell,et al.  Embodied conversational agents , 2000 .

[17]  C. Nass,et al.  Truth is beauty: researching embodied conversational agents , 2001 .

[18]  James C. Lester,et al.  The Case for Social Agency in Computer-Based Teaching: Do Students Learn More Deeply When They Interact With Animated Pedagogical Agents? , 2001 .

[19]  James C. Lester,et al.  Deictic and emotive communication in animated pedagogical agents , 2001 .

[20]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning: The Promise of Multimedia Learning , 2001 .

[21]  C. Nass,et al.  Does computer-synthesized speech manifest personality? Experimental tests of recognition, similarity-attraction, and consistency-attraction. , 2001 .

[22]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[23]  Jonas Beskow,et al.  Developing and evaluating conversational agents , 2001 .

[24]  W. Johnson,et al.  Task-oriented collaboration with embodied agents in virtual worlds , 2001 .