Functional Graded Germanium–Lead Chalcogenide‐Based Thermoelectric Module for Renewable Energy Applications

High thermoelectric conversion efficiencies can be achieved by making use of materials with, as high as possible, figure of merit, ZT, values. Moreover, even higher performance is possible with appropriate geometrical optimization including the use of functionally graded materials (FGM) technology. Here, an advanced n-type functionally graded thermoelectric material based on a phase-separated (PbSn0.05Te)0.92(PbS)0.08 matrix is reported. For assessment of the thermoelectric potential of this material, combined with the previously reported p-type Ge0.87Pb0.13Te showing a remarkable dimensionless figure of merit of 2.2, a finite-element thermoelectric model is developed. The results predict, for the investigated thermoelectric couple, a very impressive thermoelectric efficiency of 14%, which is more than 20% higher than previously reported values for operating under cold and hot junction temperatures of 50 °C and 500 °C, respectively. Validation of the model prediction is done by a thermoelectric couple fabricated according to the model's geometrical optimization conditions, showing a good agreement to the theoretically calculated results, hence approaching a higher technology readiness level.

[1]  Zinovy Dashevsky,et al.  High performance n-type PbTe-based materials for thermoelectric applications , 2005 .

[2]  Zinovy Dashevsky,et al.  Powder metallurgical processing of functionally graded p-Pb1−xSnxTe materials for thermoelectric applications , 2007 .

[3]  Z. Dashevsky,et al.  Highly efficient bismuth telluride doped p‐type Pb0.13Ge0.87Te for thermoelectric applications , 2007 .

[4]  Mitsuru Kitamura,et al.  Geometrical design of thermoelectric generators based on topology optimization , 2012 .

[5]  A. Laugier.  Thermodynamics and phase diagram calculations in II-VI and IV-VI ternary systems using an associated solution model , 1973 .

[6]  Heng Wang,et al.  Convergence of electronic bands for high performance bulk thermoelectrics , 2011, Nature.

[7]  A. V. Ryzhenkov,et al.  Phase equilibria in ternary reciprocal systems based on IV–VI compounds , 2009 .

[8]  G. J. Snyder,et al.  Enhancement of Thermoelectric Efficiency in PbTe by Distortion of the Electronic Density of States , 2008, Science.

[9]  Z. Dashevsky,et al.  Mechanical properties of PbTe-based thermoelectric semiconductors , 2008 .

[10]  Terry M. Tritt,et al.  Thermoelectric Materials, Phenomena, and Applications: A Bird’s Eye View , 2006 .

[11]  M. Dariel,et al.  Phase separation and thermoelectric properties of the Pb0.25Sn0.25Ge0.5Te compound , 2012 .

[12]  Emil Sandoz-Rosado,et al.  Robust Finite Element Model for the Design of Thermoelectric Modules , 2010 .

[13]  H. Goldsmid,et al.  Theory of Thermoelectric Refrigeration and Generation , 2010 .

[14]  Y. Bréchet,et al.  Nanostructuration via solid state transformation as a strategy for improving the thermoelectric efficiency of PbTe alloys , 2011 .

[15]  M. Dariel,et al.  Nucleation of nanosize particles following the spinodal decomposition in the pseudo-ternary Ge0.6Sn0.1Pb0.3Te compound , 2010 .

[16]  L. Yashina,et al.  Phase relations in pseudobinary systems of germanium, tin, and lead chalcogenides , 2006 .

[17]  Guodong Li,et al.  Thermoelectricity from wasted heat of integrated circuits , 2013, Applied Nanoscience.

[18]  Ctirad Uher,et al.  Spinodal decomposition and nucleation and growth as a means to bulk nanostructured thermoelectrics: enhanced performance in Pb(1-x)Sn(x)Te-PbS. , 2007, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[19]  M. Dariel,et al.  Thermoelectric Properties Evolution of Spark Plasma Sintered (Ge0.6Pb0.3Sn0.1)Te Following a Spinodal Decomposition , 2010 .

[20]  Bahgat Sammakia,et al.  Multiscale modeling of thermoelectric generators for the optimized conversion performance , 2013 .

[21]  M. Kanatzidis,et al.  Strained endotaxial nanostructures with high thermoelectric figure of merit. , 2011, Nature chemistry.

[22]  Z. Dashevsky,et al.  Highly Efficient Ge-Rich GexPb1−xTe Thermoelectric Alloys , 2010 .

[23]  Ctirad Uher,et al.  High performance Na-doped PbTe-PbS thermoelectric materials: electronic density of states modification and shape-controlled nanostructures. , 2011, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[24]  M. Kanatzidis,et al.  Controlling Metallurgical Phase Separation Reactions of the Ge0.87Pb0.13Te Alloy for High Thermoelectric Performance , 2013 .

[25]  Yaniv Gelbstein,et al.  Phase morphology effects on the thermoelectric properties of Pb0.25Sn0.25Ge0.5Te , 2013 .

[26]  Y. Gelbstein.  Thermoelectric power and structural properties in two-phase Sn/SnTe alloys , 2009 .

[27]  Markus Bartel,et al.  Multiphysics Simulation of Thermoelectric Systems for Comparison with Experimental Device Performance , 2009 .

[28]  Y. Gelbstein.  Morphological effects on the electronic transport properties of three-phase thermoelectric materials , 2012 .

[29]  D. K. Aswal,et al.  Development of low resistance electrical contacts for thermoelectric devices based on n-type PbTe and p-type TAGS-85 ((AgSbTe2)0.15(GeTe)0.85) , 2009 .

[30]  M. Kanatzidis,et al.  High-performance bulk thermoelectrics with all-scale hierarchical architectures , 2012, Nature.

[31]  J. Harris,et al.  The Pb-Sn-Te phase diagram and its application to the liquid phase epitaxial growth of Pb1−xSnxTe , 1975 .

[32]  M. Kanatzidis,et al.  Microstructure‐Lattice Thermal Conductivity Correlation in Nanostructured PbTe0.7S0.3 Thermoelectric Materials , 2010 .

[33]  Z. Dashevsky,et al.  The search for mechanically stable PbTe based thermoelectric materials , 2008 .

[34]  Z. Dashevsky,et al.  High Thermoelectric Figure of Merit and Nanostructuring in Bulk p-type Gex(SnyPb1−y)1−xTe Alloys Following a Spinodal Decomposition Reaction† , 2010 .

[35]  M. Kanatzidis,et al.  Phase separation and nanostructuring in the thermoelectric material PbTe 1 − x S x studied using the atomic pair distribution function technique , 2009 .