User Attitudes Regarding a User-Adaptive eCommerce Web Site

Despite an abundance of recommendations by researchers and more recently by commercial enterprises for adaptive interaction techniques and technologies, there exists little experimental validation of the value of such approaches to users. We have conducted user studies focussed on the perceived value of a variety of personalization features for an eCommerce Web site for computing machinery sales and support. Our study results have implications for the design of user-adaptive applications. Interesting findings include unenthusiastic user attitudes toward system attempts to infer user needs, goals, or interests and to thereby provide user-specific adaptive content. Users also expressed equivocal opinions of collaborative filtering for the specific eCommerce scenarios we studied; thus personalization features popular in one eCommerce environment may not be effective or useful for other eCommerce domains. Users expressed their strong desire to have full and explicit control of data and interaction. Lastly, users want readily to be able to make sense of site behavior, that is, to understand a site’s rationale for displaying particular content.

[1]  Robin Burke,et al.  Integrating Knowledge-based and Collaborative-filtering Recommender Systems , 2000 .

[2]  Clifford Nass,et al.  The media equation - how people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places , 1996 .

[3]  Cecile L. Paris User Modeling in Text Generation , 1993 .

[4]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  User Modeling in Human–Computer Interaction , 2001, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[5]  Cecile Paris,et al.  The use of explicit user models in text generation: tailoring to a user's level of expertise , 1988 .

[6]  Alfred Kobsa,et al.  Personalised hypermedia presentation techniques for improving online customer relationships , 2001, The Knowledge Engineering Review.

[7]  Elaine Rich,et al.  Building and Exploiting User Models , 1979, IJCAI.

[8]  Tanja Joerding Temporary user modeling for adaptive product presentations in the Web , 1999 .

[9]  Jon Oberlander,et al.  Dynamic hypertext catalogues: helping users to help themselves , 1998, HYPERTEXT '98.

[10]  Peter Brusilovsky,et al.  Adaptive Hypermedia , 2001, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[11]  David N. Chin Empirical Evaluation of User Models and User-Adapted Systems , 2001, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[12]  Michael D. McNeese,et al.  Assessment of User Affective and Belief States for Interface Adaptation: Application to an Air Force Pilot Task , 2002, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[13]  Sharon L. Oviatt,et al.  Taming recognition errors with a multimodal interface , 2000, CACM.

[14]  Alfred Kobsa User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction , 2005, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[15]  A. Koller,et al.  Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language , 1969 .

[16]  John Riedl,et al.  E-Commerce Recommendation Applications , 2004, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[17]  T.L.J. Ferris,et al.  User-Centered Design: An Integrated Approach , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[18]  Liliana Ardissono,et al.  Tailoring the interaction with users in electronic shops , 1999 .

[19]  John Vergo,et al.  A user-centered design approach to personalization , 2000, CACM.

[20]  Paul Resnick,et al.  Recommender systems , 1997, CACM.

[21]  Siobhan Chapman Logic and Conversation , 2005 .

[22]  N ChinDavid Empirical Evaluation of User Models and User-Adapted Systems , 2001 .

[23]  Scott Isensee,et al.  User-Centered Design: An Integrated Approach with Cdrom , 2001 .