SUSTAINABLE GLOBAL SUPPLIER MANAGEMENT: THE ROLE OF DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES IN ACHIEVING COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE

Organizations face increased pressure from stakeholders to incorporate a plethora of corporate responsibility (CR) and sustainability aspects in their business practices. Legal and extra-legal demands are dynamically changing; almost no organizational function is unaffected. Owing to the outsourcing wave of the last decade, in particular purchasing and supply management (PSM) plays an ever more important role in assuring sustainable production of the firm's products offered in the marketplace. The supply base of many Western firms has become increasingly global and spend volumes have shifted towards emerging countries. In order to avoid the risk of reputational damage to the buying company, the PSM department must ensure that their international suppliers comply with their corporate codes of conduct and that environmental and social misconduct at supplier premises does not occur. In this paper, “sustainability” refers to the pursuit of the tripartite of economic, environmental, and social performance. We contribute to prior research in the fields of sustainability and CR by extending insights of the dynamic capabilities view to analyze how the PSM function integrates sustainability aspects in its global supplier management processes. Based on four case studies in the chemical industry, we propose that profound sustainable global supplier management (SGSM) capabilities are a source of competitive advantage. These capabilities are path dependent and particularly valuable when organizations are receptive to external stakeholder pressure. Early movers in the field of SGSM reap competitive benefits to a notable extent as a result of resource accumulation and learning processes over time.

[1]  Ian A. Harwood,et al.  The effect of buyer pressure on suppliers in SMEs to demonstrate CSR practices: An added incentive or counter productive? , 2009 .

[2]  Mark Pagell,et al.  Building a More Complete Theory of Sustainable Supply Chain Management Using Case Studies of 10 Exemplars , 2009 .

[3]  Jerker Fick,et al.  Transparency throughout the production chain--a way to reduce pollution from the manufacturing of pharmaceuticals? , 2009, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[4]  Mette Andersen,et al.  Corporate social responsibility in global supply chains , 2009 .

[5]  M. Gibbert,et al.  What passes as a rigorous case study , 2008 .

[6]  C. Garcés‐Ayerbe,et al.  Why do patterns of environmental response differ? A stakeholders' pressure approach , 2008 .

[7]  R. Klassen,et al.  Drivers and Enablers That Foster Environmental Management Capabilities in Small‐ and Medium‐Sized Suppliers in Supply Chains , 2008 .

[8]  Margot J. Hutchins,et al.  An exploration of measures of social sustainability and their application to supply chain decisions , 2008 .

[9]  D. Rogers,et al.  A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory , 2008 .

[10]  Manoj Kumar Tiwari,et al.  Global supplier selection: a fuzzy-AHP approach , 2008 .

[11]  J. Mentzer,et al.  Global supply chain risk management strategies , 2008 .

[12]  Kenneth J. Petersen,et al.  Getting on track to better global sourcing , 2008 .

[13]  H. Walker,et al.  Drivers and barriers to environmental supply chain management practices: lessons from the public and private sectors , 2008 .

[14]  C. Steinle,et al.  Limits to global sourcing? Strategic consequences of dependency on international suppliers: Cluster theory, resource-based view and case studies , 2008 .

[15]  Holger Schiele.  Supply-management maturity, cost savings and purchasing absorptive capacity: Testing the procurement–performance link , 2007 .

[16]  Jeremy Hall,et al.  Integrating sustainable development in the supply chain: The case of life cycle assessment in oil and gas and agricultural biotechnology , 2007 .

[17]  John L. Campbell.  Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? an institutional theory of corporate social responsibility , 2007 .

[18]  Robert E. Spekman,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility in Global Supply Chains: A Procedural Justice Perspective , 2007 .

[19]  L. Araujo,et al.  Case research in purchasing and supply management: Opportunities and challenges , 2007 .

[20]  C. L. Chieng,et al.  The Corporate Social Responsibility of Pharmaceutical Product Recalls: An Empirical Examination of U.S. and U.K. Markets , 2007 .

[21]  Daniel R. Krause,et al.  The relationships between supplier development, commitment, social capital accumulation and performance improvement , 2007 .

[22]  M. Victoria López,et al.  Sustainable Development and Corporate Performance: A Study Based on the Dow Jones Sustainability Index , 2007 .

[23]  Samuel H. Huang,et al.  Comprehensive and configurable metrics for supplier selection , 2007 .

[24]  Jennifer Blackhurst,et al.  The Severity of Supply Chain Disruptions: Design Characteristics and Mitigation Capabilities , 2007, Decis. Sci..

[25]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  Theory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges , 2007 .

[26]  Christopher S. Tang.  Perspectives in supply chain risk management , 2006 .

[27]  Esben Rahbek Gjerdrum Pedersen,et al.  Safeguarding corporate social responsibility (CSR) in global supply chains: how codes of conduct are managed in buyer‐supplier relationships , 2006 .

[28]  Brian Tomlin,et al.  On the Value of Mitigation and Contingency Strategies for Managing Supply Chain Disruption Risks , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[29]  Orly Lobel,et al.  Sustainable capitalism or ethical transnationalism: Offshore production and economic development , 2006 .

[30]  L. V. Wassenhove,et al.  Sustainable Operations Management , 2005 .

[31]  Germaine H. Saad,et al.  Managing Disruption Risks in Supply Chains , 2005 .

[32]  C. Carter.  Purchasing social responsibility and firm performance: The key mediating roles of organizational learning and supplier performance , 2005 .

[33]  Andrew Crane,et al.  Are You Ethical? Please Tick Yes □ Or No □ On Researching Ethics in Business Organizations , 2004 .

[34]  C. Carter,et al.  The role of purchasing in corporate social responsibility : a structural equation analysis , 2004 .

[35]  Ángel R. Martínez‐Lorente,et al.  Benchmarking in the purchasing function and its impact on purchasing and business performance , 2003 .

[36]  R. M. Monczka,et al.  Understanding integrated global sourcing , 2003 .

[37]  Felix T. S. Chan,et al.  Using case-based reasoning to evaluate supplier environmental management performance , 2003, Expert Syst. Appl..

[38]  D. Pujari,et al.  Green and competitive: Influences on environmental new product development performance , 2003 .

[39]  S. Roberts.  Supply Chain Specific? Understanding the Patchy Success of Ethical Sourcing Initiatives , 2003 .

[40]  M. H. Nagel,et al.  Managing the environmental performance of production facilities in the electronics industry: more than application of the concept of cleaner production , 2003 .

[41]  B. Hillebrand,et al.  Managing Socially-Responsible Buying:: How to Integrate Non-economic Criteria into the Purchasing Process , 2002 .

[42]  Steven A. Melnyk,et al.  Applying environmental criteria to supplier assessment: A study in the application of the Analytical Hierarchy Process , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[43]  Maurizio Zollo,et al.  Deliberate Learning and the Evolution of Dynamic Capabilities , 2002 .

[44]  Daniel R. Krause,et al.  Toward a measure of competitive priorities for purchasing , 2001 .

[45]  Richard Makadok.  Toward a synthesis of the resource‐based and dynamic‐capability views of rent creation , 2001 .

[46]  Jeremy Hall.  Environmental supply chain dynamics , 2000 .

[47]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[48]  Petra Christmann.  Effects of “Best Practices” of Environmental Management on Cost Advantage: The Role of Complementary Assets , 2000 .

[49]  Thomas Scannell,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of Global Sourcing Strategy Effectiveness , 2000 .

[50]  M. Braglia,et al.  A quality assurance‐oriented methodology for handling trade‐offs in supplier selection , 2000 .

[51]  Jennifer Nash,et al.  Industry codes as agents of change: responsible care adoption by US chemical companies , 1999 .

[52]  John N. Pearson,et al.  Strategically managed buyer–supplier relationships and performance outcomes , 1999 .

[53]  William A. Ruch,et al.  Examining Supplier Improvement Efforts from Both Sides , 1999 .

[54]  Daniel R. Krause,et al.  An empirical investigation of supplier development: reactive and strategic processes , 1998 .

[55]  C. Perry.  Processes of a case study methodology for postgraduate research in marketing , 1998 .

[56]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[57]  Janet L. Hartley,et al.  Process Oriented Supplier Development: Building the Capability for Change , 1997 .

[58]  M. Russo,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective On Corporate Environmental Performance And Profitability , 1997 .

[59]  G. Noci,et al.  Designing "green" vendor rating systems for the assessment of suppliers environmental performance , 1997 .

[60]  Daniel R. Krause,et al.  Success factors in supplier development , 1997 .

[61]  Reginald A. Litz.  A resource-based-view of the socially responsible firm: Stakeholder interdependence, ethical awareness, and issue responsiveness as strategic assets , 1996 .

[62]  Steve New,et al.  PURCHASING AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT: INTERACTIONS, POLICIES AND OPPORTUNITIES , 1996 .

[63]  S. Hart,et al.  A Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1995 .

[64]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  Green and Competitive : Ending the Stalemate , 1996 .

[65]  Hokey Min.  International Supplier Selection , 1994 .

[66]  Margaret A. Peteraf.  The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[67]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[68]  Chan K. Hahn,et al.  The Supplier Development Program: A Conceptual Model , 1990 .

[69]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[70]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[71]  A. Nederhof.  Methods of coping with social desirability bias: A review. , 1985 .

[72]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[73]  C. Weiss,et al.  Interviewer Biasing Effects: Toward a Reconciliation of Findings , 1969 .

[74]  Gary W. Dickson,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF VENDOR SELECTION SYSTEMS AND DECISIONS , 1966 .

[75]  K. Basu,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: A Process Model of Sensemaking , 2008 .

[76]  R. Handfield,et al.  Environmental Management Systems and Green Supply Chain Management: Complements for Sustainability? , 2008 .

[77]  Robert E. Spekman,et al.  The LCCS success factors , 2008 .

[78]  S. Seuring,et al.  Incorporating sustainability into supply management in the automotive industry – the case of the Volkswagen AG , 2007 .

[79]  Giannis T. Tsoulfas,et al.  Environmental principles applicable to supply chains design and operation , 2006 .

[80]  Abagail McWilliams,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theory of the Firm Perspective , 2001 .

[81]  A. Campbell,et al.  Corporate strategy: The quest for parenting advantage , 1995 .

[82]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The Core Competence of the Corporation , 1990 .

[83]  Hokey Min,et al.  International Supplier Selection : : A Multi-attribute Utility Approach , 2022 .