Analysis of pseudo-spectral methods used for numerical simulation of turbulence

Events in turbulent flows computed by direct numerical simulation (DNS) are often calibrated with properties based on homogeneous isotropic turbulence, advanced by Kolmogorov, and given in Turbulence, U. Frisch, Cambridge Univ. Press, UK (1995). However, these computational procedures are not calibrated using numerical analyses in order to assess their strengths and weaknesses for DNS. This is with the exception in "A critical assessment of simulations for transitional and turbulence flows- Sengupta, T.K., In Proc. of IUTAM Symp. on Advances in Computation, Modeling and Control of Transitional and Turbulent Flows, 491-532, (eds. Sengupta, Lele, Sreenivasan, Davidson), WSPC, Singapore (2016)", where such a calibration has been advocated for numerical schemes using global spectral analysis (GSA) for the convection equation. In recent times, due to growing computing power, simulations have been reported using pseudo-spectral methods, with spatial discretization performed in Fourier spectral space and time-integration by multi-stage Runge-Kutta (RK) methods. Here, we perform GSA of Fourier spectral methods for the first time with RK2 and other multistage Runge-Kutta methods using the model linear convection and convection-diffusion equations. With the help of GSA, various sources of numerical errors are quantified. The major limitations of the RK2-Fourier spectral method are demonstrated for DNS and alternate choices are presented. We specify optimal parameters to achieve the best possible accuracy for simulations. There is a one-to-one correspondence of numerical solutions obtained by linear convection-diffusion equation and nonlinear Navier-Stokes equation with respect to numerical parameters. This enables us to investigate the capabilities of the numerical methods for DNS.

[1]  Tapan K. Sengupta,et al.  Spectral analysis of finite difference schemes for convection diffusion equation , 2017 .

[2]  V. Yakhot,et al.  Finite-size effects in forced two-dimensional turbulence , 1994, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[3]  T. Sengupta A Critical Assessment of Simluations for Transitional and Turbulent Flows , 2016 .

[4]  Seyed G. Saddoughi,et al.  Local isotropy in turbulent boundary layers at high Reynolds number , 1994, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[5]  Byung-Gu Kim,et al.  Alignment of velocity and vorticity and the intermittent distribution of helicity in isotropic turbulence. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  Richard D. Sandberg,et al.  Two Dimensional Analysis of Hybrid Spectral/Finite Difference Schemes for Linearized Compressible Navier-Stokes Equations , 2021, J. Sci. Comput..

[7]  P. Moin,et al.  DIRECT NUMERICAL SIMULATION: A Tool in Turbulence Research , 1998 .

[8]  D. Henningson,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of a separated turbulent boundary layer , 2002, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  T. Sengupta,et al.  Precursor of transition to turbulence: spatiotemporal wave front. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[10]  Mitsuo Yokokawa,et al.  Energy dissipation rate and energy spectrum in high resolution direct numerical simulations of turbulence in a periodic box , 2003 .

[11]  Tosio Kato,et al.  Remarks on the breakdown of smooth solutions for the 3-D Euler equations , 1984 .

[12]  Diego Donzis,et al.  Dissipation, enstrophy and pressure statistics in turbulence simulations at high Reynolds numbers , 2012, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[13]  Stephen B. Pope,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of homogeneous turbulence with hyperviscosity , 2005 .

[14]  Charles R. Doering The 3D Navier-Stokes Problem , 2009 .

[15]  Diego Donzis,et al.  Dissipation and enstrophy in isotropic turbulence: Resolution effects and scaling in direct numerical simulations , 2008 .

[16]  Hermann F. Fasel,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of controlled transition in a flat-plate boundary layer , 1995, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[17]  Pierre Sagaut,et al.  A linear dispersive mechanism for numerical error growth: spurious caustics , 2006 .

[18]  Y. Bhumkar,et al.  Direct numerical simulation of two-dimensional wall-bounded turbulent flows from receptivity stage. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[19]  Mitsuo Yokokawa,et al.  Energy spectrum in high-resolution direct numerical simulations of turbulence , 2016 .

[20]  T. K. Sengupta,et al.  Error dynamics: Beyond von Neumann analysis , 2007, J. Comput. Phys..

[21]  Keshava Suman Vajjala,et al.  Effects of numerical anti-diffusion in closed unsteady flows governed by two-dimensional Navier-Stokes equation , 2020 .

[22]  Stephen B. Pope,et al.  An examination of forcing in direct numerical simulations of turbulence , 1988 .

[23]  Katepalli R. Sreenivasan,et al.  Dissipation range of the energy spectrum in high Reynolds number turbulence , 2020, 2004.06274.

[24]  Tapan K. Sengupta,et al.  Diffusion in inhomogeneous flows: Unique equilibrium state in an internal flow , 2013 .

[25]  Alain Pumir,et al.  Self-attenuation of extreme events in Navier–Stokes turbulence , 2020, Nature communications.

[26]  Tapan K. Sengupta,et al.  Error dynamics of diffusion equation: Effects of numerical diffusion and dispersive diffusion , 2014, J. Comput. Phys..

[27]  R. Rogallo Numerical experiments in homogeneous turbulence , 1981 .

[28]  Y. Kaneda,et al.  Study of High-Reynolds Number Isotropic Turbulence by Direct Numerical Simulation , 2009 .

[29]  T. Sengupta,et al.  Onset of turbulence from the receptivity stage of fluid flows. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[30]  James C. McWilliams,et al.  Reynolds-number dependency in homogeneous, stationary two-dimensional turbulence , 2010, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[31]  Diego Donzis,et al.  Resolution effects and scaling in numerical simulations of passive scalar mixing in turbulence , 2010 .