The difference between "giving a rose" and "giving a kiss": Sustained neural activity to the light verb construction.

We used event-related potentials (ERPs) to investigate the neurocognitive mechanisms associated with processing light verb constructions such as "give a kiss". These constructions consist of a semantically underspecified light verb ("give") and an event nominal that contributes most of the meaning and also activates an argument structure of its own ("kiss"). This creates a mismatch between the syntactic constituents and the semantic roles of a sentence. Native speakers read German verb-final sentences that contained light verb constructions (e.g., "Julius gave Anne a kiss"), non-light constructions (e.g., "Julius gave Anne a rose"), and semantically anomalous constructions (e.g., *"Julius gave Anne a conversation"). ERPs were measured at the critical verb, which appeared after all its arguments. Compared to non-light constructions, the light verb constructions evoked a widely distributed, frontally focused, sustained negative-going effect between 500 and 900 ms after verb onset. We interpret this effect as reflecting working memory costs associated with complex semantic processes that establish a shared argument structure in the light verb constructions.

[1]  John C J Hoeks,et al.  Seeing words in context: the interaction of lexical and sentence level information during reading. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[2]  S. Geisser,et al.  On methods in the analysis of profile data , 1959 .

[3]  D. Caplan,et al.  The role of animacy and thematic relationships in processing active English sentences: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2007, Brain and Language.

[4]  G. Kuperberg,et al.  Multiple Influences of Semantic Memory on Sentence Processing: Distinct Effects of Semantic Relatedness on Violations of Real-World Event/State Knowledge and Animacy Selection Restrictions. , 2012, Journal of memory and language.

[5]  Giosuè Baggio,et al.  Coercion and Compositionality , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  Ottojespersen.  A Modern English Grammar On Historical Principles Part Vi , 1954 .

[7]  Asaf Bachrach,et al.  Structuring the argument : multidisciplinary research on verb argument structure , 2014 .

[8]  M. Kutas,et al.  Who Did What and When? Using Word- and Clause-Level ERPs to Monitor Working Memory Usage in Reading , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  Martin J. Pickering,et al.  Underspecification and Aspectual Coercion , 2006 .

[10]  Adele E. Goldberg.  Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  Martin Paczynski,et al.  The processing and representation of light verb constructions , 2014 .

[12]  Giosuè Baggio,et al.  Computing and recomputing discourse models : An ERP study , 2008 .

[13]  Maria Mercedes Piñango,et al.  Semantic Combinatorial Processes in Argument Structure: Evidence from Light-Verbs , 2006 .

[14]  Neil Cohn,et al.  Electrophysiological Correlates of Complement Coercion , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  Martin Paczynski,et al.  When Events Change Their Nature: The Neurocognitive Mechanisms Underlying Aspectual Coercion , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[16]  L. Osterhout,et al.  The independence of combinatory semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2005 .

[17]  Daniel Gildea,et al.  The Proposition Bank: An Annotated Corpus of Semantic Roles , 2005, CL.

[18]  Gina R. Kuperberg,et al.  Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: Challenges to syntax , 2007, Brain Research.

[19]  Miriam Butt.  The light verb jungle : still hacking away , 2010 .

[20]  Z. Harris,et al.  Foundations of Language , 1940 .

[21]  M. Kutas,et al.  Bridging the Gap: Evidence from ERPs on the Processing of Unbounded Dependencies , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[22]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  When and how do listeners relate a sentence to the wider discourse? Evidence from the N400 effect. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[23]  Mark Durie,et al.  Verb Serialization and "Verbal-Prepositions" in Oceanic Languages , 1988 .

[24]  Jesse Snedeker,et al.  It takes two to kiss, but does it take three to give a kiss? Categorization based on thematic roles , 2014 .

[25]  Stefan Müller,et al.  Persian complex predicates and the limits of inheritance-based analyses , 2010 .

[26]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing , 2007, Brain Research.

[27]  Ken Hale,et al.  On Argument Structure and the Lexical Expression of Syntactic Relations , 1993 .

[28]  David M. Groppe,et al.  Overlapping dual ERP responses to low cloze probability sentence continuations. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[29]  H. Kolk,et al.  An ERP study of P600 effects elicited by semantic anomalies. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[30]  Miriam Butt.  The Light Verb Jungle , 2003 .

[31]  Heike Wiese,et al.  "Ich mach dich Messer" : grammatische Produktivität in Kiez-Sprache ("Kanak Sprak") , 2006 .

[32]  C. Phillips,et al.  Journal of Memory and Language , 2001 .

[33]  Stephen Wechsler,et al.  Lexical approaches to argument structure , 2014 .

[34]  K. Kraus,et al.  The DWDS corpus: A reference corpus for the German language of the 20 century , 2006 .

[35]  Colin Phillips,et al.  Parser-grammar relations: , 2013 .

[36]  Maria Mercedes Piñango,et al.  Processing light verb constructions , 2011 .

[37]  Simeon Potter,et al.  A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part V: Syntax, Fourth Volume@@@A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part VI: Morphology , 1947 .

[38]  Dorothee J. Chwilla,et al.  Monitoring in Language Perception , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[39]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Early referential context effects in sentence processing: Evidence from event-related brain potentials , 1999 .

[40]  Phillip J. Holcomb,et al.  Neural correlates of processing syntactic, semantic, and thematic relationships in sentences , 2006 .

[41]  Seana Coulson,et al.  Semantic Leaps: FRAME-SHIFTING , 2001 .

[42]  Sabine Schulte im Walde,et al.  Distinct processing of function verb categories in the human brain , 2009, Brain Research.

[43]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  So that's what you meant! Event-related potentials reveal multiple aspects of context use during construction of message-level meaning , 2012, NeuroImage.

[44]  Liina Pylkkänen,et al.  journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/b&l Processing events: Behavioral and neuromagnetic correlates of Aspectual Coercion , 2022 .

[45]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  When Peanuts Fall in Love: N400 Evidence for the Power of Discourse , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  Dukkyo Jung.  Light Verb just as a Little v , 2002 .

[47]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  An alternative perspective on “semantic P600” effects in language comprehension , 2008, Brain Research Reviews.

[48]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  The syntactic positive shift (sps) as an erp measure of syntactic processing , 1993 .

[49]  Z. Harris,et al.  Foundations of language , 1941 .

[50]  A. Friederici,et al.  Verb Argument Structure Processing: The Role of Verb-Specific and Argument-Specific Information☆☆☆ , 2000 .

[51]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  The interplay between semantic and referential aspects of anaphoric noun phrase resolution: Evidence from ERPs , 2008, Brain and Language.

[52]  D. Caplan,et al.  Electrophysiological distinctions in processing conceptual relationships within simple sentences. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[53]  H. M. Müller,et al.  Event-related potentials elicited by spoken relative clauses. , 1997, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[54]  Mante S. Nieuwland,et al.  The Neurocognition of Referential Ambiguity in Language Comprehension , 2008, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[55]  S. J. Keyser,et al.  Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure , 2002 .

[56]  Daniela Briem,et al.  Neurotopographie der Speicherung und Verarbeitung von lexiko-semantisch und syntaktisch unterschiedlichen Verb-Klassen , 2009 .

[57]  S L Wolf,et al.  An Alternative Perspective , 1999, Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback.

[58]  P. Holcomb,et al.  Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly , 1992 .

[59]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[60]  Oliver Bott,et al.  The Processing of Events , 2010 .

[61]  C. Petten,et al.  A special role for the right hemisphere in metaphor comprehension? ERP evidence from hemifield presentation , 2007, Brain Research.

[62]  M. Baker.  Object sharing and projection in serial verb constructions , 1989 .

[63]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.

[64]  Hiroshi Nagata,et al.  The relativity of linguistic intuition: The effect of repetition on grammaticality judgments , 1988 .

[65]  Gina R Kuperberg,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for use of the animacy hierarchy, but not thematic role assignment, during verb-argument processing , 2011, Language and cognitive processes.

[66]  C. Van Petten,et al.  Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components. , 2012, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[67]  Raffaella Folli,et al.  Determinants of Event Types on Persian Complex Predicates , 2005 .