Contextualised Concerns: The Online Privacy Attitudes of Young Adults

Existing research into online privacy attitudes, whilst useful, remains insufficient. This paper begins by outlining the shortcomings of this existing research before offering a fresh approach which is inspired by Solove’s notion of “situated and dynamic” privacy. With reference to ongoing PhD research it is argued that the generation of rich, situated data can help us to understand privacy attitudes in context. In this research semi-structured interviews are being used in order to grasp how young adults understand, manage, and negotiate their privacy across online settings. The paper concludes with a call for further qualitative research into online privacy attitudes and suggests focusing on more niche online settings than Facebook.

[1]  J. Lewis,et al.  Students' Facebook ‘friends’: public and private spheres , 2009 .

[2]  Paul Wang,et al.  Direct marketing activities and personal privacy , 1993 .

[3]  Benjamin Gerber,et al.  Conceptualizing privacy , 2010, CSOC.

[4]  Alessandro Acquisti,et al.  Information revelation and privacy in online social networks , 2005, WPES '05.

[5]  S. Kvale.  Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .

[6]  Mary Ellen Gordon,et al.  A segmentation study of consumers’ attitudes toward direct mail , 1994 .

[7]  Anders Albrechtslund,et al.  Online Social Networking as Participatory Surveillance , 2008, First Monday.

[8]  Richard L. Divine,et al.  Adolescents' Concern for Privacy When Using the Internet: An Empirical Analysis of Predictors and Relationships With Privacy‐Protecting Behaviors , 2007 .

[9]  Gerald L. Lohse,et al.  International Differences in Information Privacy Concerns: A Global Survey of Consumers , 2004, Inf. Soc..

[10]  D. Boyd.  Facebook's Privacy Trainwreck , 2008 .

[11]  Zeynep Tufekci.  Can You See Me Now? Audience and Disclosure Regulation in Online Social Network Sites , 2008 .

[12]  Hichang Cho,et al.  A multinational study on online privacy: global concerns and local responses , 2009, New Media Soc..

[13]  Kate Raynes-Goldie,et al.  Aliases, Creeping, and Wall Cleaning: Understanding Privacy in the Age of Facebook , 2010, First Monday.

[14]  M. Prensky.  Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1 , 2001 .

[15]  Dara V. O'Neil.  Analysis of Internet Users’ Level of Online Privacy Concerns , 2001 .

[16]  James A. Holstein,et al.  The active interview , 1995 .

[17]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers' use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression , 2008, New Media Soc..

[18]  Louis D. Brandeis,et al.  The Right to Privacy , 1890 .

[19]  J. W. DeCew,et al.  Uneasy Access: Privacy for Women in a Free Society , 1988 .

[20]  Sonia Livingstone,et al.  Mediating the public/private boundary at home: children's use of the Internet for privacy and participation , 2005 .

[21]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship , 2007, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[22]  Daniel R. Horne,et al.  The Privacy Paradox: Personal Information Disclosure Intentions versus Behaviors , 2007 .

[23]  D. Boyd.  Why Youth (Heart) Social Network Sites: The Role of Networked Publics in Teenage Social Life , 2007 .

[24]  Joshua Fogel,et al.  Internet social network communities: Risk taking, trust, and privacy concerns , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[25]  J. Phelps,et al.  Understanding privacy concerns , 1992 .

[26]  D. Buckingham.  Youth, Identity, and Digital Media , 2007 .

[27]  Susan B. Barnes,et al.  A privacy paradox: Social networking in the United States , 2006, First Monday.

[28]  Jae-Shin Lee,et al.  Optimistic bias about online privacy risks: Testing the moderating effects of perceived controllability and prior experience , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[29]  Alexandre Coutant,et al.  How Teenagers Deal with their Privacy on Social Network Sites? Results from a National Survey in France , 2010, AAAI Spring Symposium: Intelligent Information Privacy Management.

[30]  E. Aronson,et al.  Theory and method , 1985 .

[31]  Tanya Byron,et al.  Safer children in a digital world : the report of the Byron Review : be safe, be aware, have fun , 2008 .

[32]  G. Gilbert,et al.  Researching Social Life , 1994 .

[33]  Randall P. Bezanson.  The Right to Privacy Revisited: Privacy, News, and Social Change, 1890-1990 , 1992 .

[34]  N. Howe,et al.  Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation , 2000 .

[35]  Seounmi Youn,et al.  Gender and Online Privacy among Teens: Risk Perception, Privacy Concerns, and Protection Behaviors , 2008, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[36]  Nigel Gilbert,et al.  Research, Theory and Method , 2001 .

[37]  Ellen Garbarino,et al.  GENDER DIFFERENCES IN THE PERCEIVED RISK OF BUYING ONLINE AND THE EFFECTS OF RECEIVING A SITE RECOMMENDATION , 2004 .

[38]  M. Prensky.  Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants , 2001 .

[39]  M. Prensky.  Do They Really Think Differently , 2001 .

[40]  Alice E. Marwick,et al.  Youth, Privacy and Reputation (Literature Review) , 2010 .

[41]  George R. Milne,et al.  Gender Differences in Privacy-Related Measures for Young Adult Facebook Users , 2010 .

[42]  K. Sheehan,et al.  An investigation of gender differences in on-line privacy concerns and resultant behaviors , 1999 .

[43]  S. Livingstone.  Critical debates in internet studies: reflections on an emerging field , 2005 .