About the effects of instrument errors in interferometric radiometry

[1] The SMOS mission is a European Space Agency (ESA) project aimed at global monitoring of surface soil moisture and sea surface salinity from radiometric L-band observations. The radiometer onboard SMOS uses a 2-D synthetic aperture concept in order to achieve satisfactory spatial resolution performances for a minimal cost in terms of payload mass and volume. As the satellite moves ahead, every area on Earth's surface is seen at a variety of incidence angles. This multiangular capability is used in the retrieval of geophysical parameters. A major issue for obtaining useful measurements of the surface salinity is the radiometric accuracy, since the overall dynamic range resulting from ocean salinity variations only extends over a few Kelvin. To improve instrument performances, it is foreseen that independent retrieved salinity estimates will be averaged over a suitable space/time domain. This should bring random uncertainties due to radiometric sensitivity down to around 0.1 Practical Salinity Scale (PSS). However, several systematic error sources are also present: biases arise from channel or baseline instrument errors and are superimposed to Gibbs oscillations generated through the reconstruction of brightness temperature fields from correlation products. It is thus of importance to assess to which extent these errors can be averaged out when building space/time averages of the retrieved salinity values. The presents study is a step toward addressing this issue.

[1]  Adriano Camps,et al.  Impact of receiver errors on the radiometric resolution of large two‐dimensional aperture synthesis radiometers , 1997 .

[2]  Adriano Camps,et al.  Impact of antenna errors on the radiometric accuracy of large aperture synthesis radiometers , 1997 .

[3]  Adriano Camps,et al.  The processing of hexagonally sampled signals with standard rectangular techniques: application to 2-D large aperture synthesis interferometric radiometers , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[4]  Y. Kerr,et al.  Selecting an optimal configuration for the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity mission , 2003 .

[5]  Adriano Camps,et al.  Analysis of noise-injection networks for interferometric-radiometer calibration , 2000 .

[6]  C. Ruf,et al.  Interferometric synthetic aperture microwave radiometry for the remote sensing of the Earth , 1988 .

[7]  Adriano Camps,et al.  Angular resolution of two‐dimensional, hexagonally sampled interferometric radiometers , 1998 .

[8]  Adriano Camps,et al.  On-board phase and modulus calibration of large aperture synthesis radiometers: study applied to MIRAS , 1996, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[9]  Yann Kerr,et al.  Soil moisture retrieval from space: the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) mission , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[10]  E. Anterrieu,et al.  Image reconstruction methods for remote sensing by aperture synthesis , 1994, Proceedings of IGARSS '94 - 1994 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[11]  Philippe Waldteufel,et al.  About off-axis radiometric polarimetric measurements , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..