Functionally-based screening criteria for hearing-critical jobs based on the Hearing in Noise Test

Effective communication is a crucial requirement in many workplaces to ensure safe and effective operations. Often, critical verbal communications are carried out in noise, which can be very challenging, particularly for individuals with hearing loss. Diagnostic measures of hearing, such as the audiogram, are not adequate to make accurate predictions of speech intelligibility in real-world environments for specific workers, and thus are not generally suitable as a basis for making employment decisions. Instead, the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) has been identified and validated for use in predicting speech intelligibility in a wide range of communication environments. The approach to validation of the HINT takes into account the expected voice level of the talker, the communication distance between the talker and the listener, and a statistical model of speech intelligibility in real-world occupational noises. For each hearing-critical task, a HINT screening threshold score is derived upon specification of the minimum level of performance required of the workers. The HINT is available in several languages, so the tools developed are applicable in a wide range of settings, including multilingual workplaces.

[1]  Tom Frank,et al.  Speech production in noise with and without hearing protection. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Edward J. Thwing Effect of Repetition on Articulation Scores for PB Words , 1956 .

[3]  C Laroche,et al.  An approach to the development of hearing standards for hearing-critical jobs. , 2003, Noise & health.

[4]  Joseph Sataloff,et al.  Hearing Protection Devices , 2006 .

[5]  R. Hetu Auditory capacities, job requirements and personal rights , 1993 .

[6]  Chantal Laroche,et al.  Medical examination of hearing required by quebec regulations: A relevance analysis , 2005 .

[7]  Mead C. Killion,et al.  What can the pure‐tone audiogram tell us about a patient's SNR loss? , 2000 .

[8]  Stanley Forshaw,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL HEARING REQUIREMENTS , 1997 .

[9]  S. Kramer,et al.  The self-reported handicapping effect of hearing disabilities. , 1998, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[10]  Chantal Laroche,et al.  Quantifying the benefits of sentence repetition on the intelligibility of speech in continuous and fluctuating noises , 2006 .

[11]  H. Lane,et al.  The Lombard Sign and the Role of Hearing in Speech , 1971 .

[12]  M. Ericson,et al.  Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  S. Soli,et al.  Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Thomas Gold,et al.  Hearing , 1953, Trans. IRE Prof. Group Inf. Theory.

[16]  G A Studebaker,et al.  The effect of noise spectrum on speech recognition performance-intensity functions. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[17]  R M Cox,et al.  Development of the Profile of Hearing Aid Performance (PHAP). , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[18]  Bruce A. Schneider From acoustics to cognition: Some suprising results , 2004 .

[19]  K. S. Rhebergen,et al.  A Speech Intelligibility Index-based approach to predict the speech reception threshold for sentences in fluctuating noise for normal-hearing listeners. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  S. Soli,et al.  Adaptation of the HINT (hearing in noise test) for adult Canadian Francophone populations , 2005, International journal of audiology.

[21]  M Haggard,et al.  Selectivity versus summation in multiple observation tasks: evidence with spectrum parameter noise in speech. , 1973, Acta psychologica.

[22]  Jean-Claude Junqua,et al.  The influence of acoustics on speech production: A noise-induced stress phenomenon known as the Lombard reflex , 1996, Speech Commun..

[23]  Sallyanne Palethorpe,et al.  Cue enhancement by stimulus repetition: Natural and synthetic speech comparisons , 1985 .

[24]  R. H. Bernacki,et al.  Effects of noise on speech production: acoustic and perceptual analyses. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  G F Smoorenburg,et al.  Speech reception in quiet and in noisy conditions by individuals with noise-induced hearing loss in relation to their tone audiogram. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[26]  C. Laroche Cases of possible job discrimination based on hearing loss , 1994 .

[27]  Chantal Laroche,et al.  A statistical model for prediction of functional hearing abilities in real‐world noise environments , 2005 .