Median non-local means filtering for low SNR image denoising: Application to PET with anatomical knowledge

Denoising low signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) images is a significant challenge since the intensity gradient due to noise elements may compete with or even exceed the intensity gradient due to features in the images. This situation can often be encountered in photon-limited medical imaging applications such as MLEM reconstructed Positron Emission Tomography (PET) images. In this study, we propose a median non-local means filter for denoising low-SNR images. The proposed method incorporates a median filtering operation indirectly in the non­local means (NLM) method, which gives more robust estimation of the weights used to average the pixels in the image. For the application of multi-modality imaging such as PET/CT, we further extended the method to incorporate anatomical side information which can be obtained from co-registered CT images without segmentation to preserve abrupt changes between organs on PET images and reduce the computational cost of weight calculations. We applied the proposed method (AMNLM) to a PET/CT simulation, a real physical phantom study and a clinical patient study with lung lesions. The results suggest that the proposed method outperforms the standard Gaussian filtering approach, anisotropic-median diffusion filtering (AMDF) and NLM in terms of visual assessment and trade-off between lesion contrast and noise.

[1]  Anand Rangarajan,et al.  Bayesian reconstruction of functional images using anatomical information as priors , 1993, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[2]  Jinyi Qi,et al.  Iterative reconstruction techniques in emission computed tomography , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Scale-Space and Edge Detection Using Anisotropic Diffusion , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[4]  B. Tsui,et al.  Noise properties of the EM algorithm: II. Monte Carlo simulations. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Donald Geman,et al.  Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images , 1984 .

[6]  Donald W. Wilson,et al.  Noise properties of the EM algorithm. I. Theory , 1994 .

[7]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  A Review of Image Denoising Algorithms, with a New One , 2005, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[8]  Michael J. Black,et al.  Fields of Experts: a framework for learning image priors , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[9]  Roger Fulton,et al.  A non-local post-filtering algorithm for PET incorporating anatomical knowledge , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[10]  J. Bowsher,et al.  Utilizing MRI information to estimate F18-FDG distributions in rat flank tumors , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[11]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  A non-local algorithm for image denoising , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[12]  Charles Kervrann,et al.  Optimal Spatial Adaptation for Patch-Based Image Denoising , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[13]  Pierrick Coupé,et al.  An Optimized Blockwise Nonlocal Means Denoising Filter for 3-D Magnetic Resonance Images , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  Christophe Deroose,et al.  Performance of MAP Reconstruction for Hot Lesion Detection in Whole-Body PET/CT: An Evaluation With Human and Numerical Observers , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Smoothing low-SNR molecular images via anisotropic median-diffusion , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Daniel Cremers,et al.  Efficient Nonlocal Means for Denoising of Textural Patterns , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  Suyash P. Awate,et al.  Feature-Preserving MRI Denoising: A Nonparametric Empirical Bayes Approach , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  F. Hermansen,et al.  Noise reduction and convergence of Bayesian algorithms with blobs based on the Huber function and median root prior , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  L. Rudin,et al.  Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms , 1992 .

[20]  Anthonin Reilhac,et al.  Evaluation of different MRI-based anatomical priors for PET brain imaging , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).