Independent Sampling of Features Enables Conscious Perception of Bound Objects

Decades of research suggest that selective attention is critical for binding the features of objects together for conscious perception. A fundamental question, however, remains unresolved: How do people perceive objects, albeit with binding errors (illusory conjunctions), when attentional resolution is poor? We used a novel technique to investigate how features are selected to create percepts of bound objects. We measured the correlation of errors (intrusions) in color and identity reports in spatial and temporal selection tasks under conditions of varying spatial or temporal uncertainty. Our findings suggest that attention selects each feature independently by randomly sampling from a probability distribution over space or time. Thus, veridical perception of bound object features arises only when attentional selection is sufficiently precise that the independently sampled features originate from a single object.

[1]  R J HERRNSTEIN,et al.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  A. Treisman,et al.  Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  D. Hubel,et al.  Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. , 1988, Science.

[5]  M. Nissen,et al.  Attentional processing and the independence of color and orientation. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  M A Monheit,et al.  Spatial attention to arrays of multidimensional objects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  R Ivry,et al.  A formal theory of feature binding in object perception. , 1996, Psychological review.

[8]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  Probing Unconscious Visual Processing with the McCollough Effect , 1998, Consciousness and Cognition.

[9]  J. Wolfe,et al.  The Psychophysical Evidence for a Binding Problem in Human Vision , 1999, Neuron.

[10]  M. Suero,et al.  A model of the formation of illusory conjunctions in the time domain. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Y. Tsal Do Illusory Conjunctions Support the Feature Integration Theory ? A Critical Review of Theory and Findings , 2001 .

[12]  C. Bundesen,et al.  Independent encoding of colors and shapes from two stimuli , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[13]  L. Robertson Binding, spatial attention and perceptual awareness , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[14]  I. Arend,et al.  Illusory Conjunctions in the Time Domain and the Resulting Time-Course of the Attentional Blink , 2004, The Spanish Journal of Psychology.

[15]  A. Treisman,et al.  Attentional spread in the statistical processing of visual displays , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  Lawrence C. Sincich,et al.  The circuitry of V1 and V2: integration of color, form, and motion. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[17]  Edward Vul,et al.  Contingent aftereffects distinguish conscious and preconscious color processing , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  A. Treisman How the deployment of attention determines what we see , 2006, Visual cognition.

[19]  Chih-Jen Wei,et al.  Characterizing the Limits of Human Visual Awareness , 2007 .

[20]  Harold Pashler,et al.  A Boolean map theory of visual attention. , 2007, Psychological review.

[21]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  Markov Chain Monte Carlo with People , 2007, NIPS.

[22]  A. Oliva,et al.  The Representation of Simple Ensemble Visual Features Outside the Focus of Attention , 2008, Psychological science.

[23]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  A Rational Analysis of Rule-Based Concept Learning , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[24]  H. Pashler,et al.  Measuring the Crowd Within , 2008, Psychological science.

[25]  Aude Oliva,et al.  Spatial ensemble statistics are efficient codes that can be represented with reduced attention , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Attention as inference: selection is probabilistic; responses are all-or-none samples. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. General.