Design-Grounded Assessment: A Framework and a Case Study of Web 2.0 Practices in Higher Education

This paper synthesises three theoretical perspectives, including sociocultural theory, distributed cognition, and situated cognition, into a framework to guide the design and assessment of Web 2.0 practices in higher education. In addition, this paper presents a case study of Web 2.0 practices. Thirty-seven online graduate students participated in a small-group collaborative concept mapping activity using Web 2.0 applications (e.g. Webspiration ) to construct sophisticated understanding of instructional design processes. The analysis of this case focuses on different assessment strategies adopted to ensure students' successful participation in such technology-rich collaborative context. This case study concludes that a shared goal needs to be in place to establish a purpose of collaboration. The collaborative nature of learning afforded by Web 2.0 applications needs to be acknowledged through the award of grades. That is, both the processes and products of collaborative knowledge construction need to be assessed and formally graded at individual and group levels. This paper also suggests several potential assessment strategies that may enhance smoother Web 2.0 practices, and discusses some possible challenges associated with those strategies.

[1]  J. Greeno THE SITUATIVITY OF KNOWING, LEARNING, AND RESEARCH , 1998 .

[2]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Educational psychology : a century of contributions , 2003 .

[3]  Margaret Hamilton,et al.  Students as Web 2.0 Authors: Implications for Assessment Design and Conduct. , 2010 .

[4]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[5]  L. S. Vygotskiĭ,et al.  Mind in society : the development of higher psychological processes , 1978 .

[6]  Tim O'Reilly,et al.  What is Web 2.0: Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software , 2007 .

[7]  C. Gunawardena,et al.  A theoretical framework for building online communities of practice with social networking tools , 2009 .

[8]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[9]  Mark J. W. Lee,et al.  Personalised and Self Regulated Learning in the Web 2.0 Era: International Exemplars of Innovative Pedagogy Using Social Software. , 2010 .

[10]  Jeroen Janssen,et al.  Effects of representational guidance during computer-supported collaborative learning , 2008, ICLS.

[11]  D. Schunk Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective , 1991 .

[12]  Konstantinos Tatsis,et al.  Supporting "Learning by Design" Activities Using Group Blogs , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[13]  S. Ainsworth DeFT: A Conceptual Framework for Considering Learning with Multiple Representations. , 2006 .

[14]  J. Michael Spector,et al.  Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 3rd Edition , 2012 .

[15]  Claire Brooks,et al.  Using Blogging for Higher Order Learning in Large Cohort University Teaching: A Case Study. , 2008 .

[16]  Florence Martin,et al.  Multimedia competencies for an educational technologist: A survey of professionals and job announcement analysis , 2010 .

[17]  L. Quéré Cognition in Practice , 1996 .

[18]  D. McConnell,et al.  Examining a collaborative assessment process in networked lifelong learning , 1999, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[19]  Matthias Görtz,et al.  Using feedback to enhance collaborative learning: an exploratory study concerning the added value of self- and peer-assessment by first-year students in a blended learning lecture , 2010 .

[20]  Susan M. Land,et al.  Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments. , 1999 .

[21]  Fengfeng Ke,et al.  The effect of peer feedback for blogging on college students' reflective learning processes , 2008, Internet High. Educ..

[22]  Mary Kalantzis,et al.  Learning by Design , 2010 .

[23]  Hyung Nam Kim,et al.  The phenomenon of blogs and theoretical model of blog use in educational contexts , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[24]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Cooperation and the Use of Technology , 2007 .

[25]  Vetta Vratulis,et al.  Social negotiations in a wiki environment: a case study with pre‐service teachers , 2008 .

[26]  Rita C. Richey,et al.  Instructional Design Competencies: The Standards. Third Edition. , 2001 .

[27]  Janet Macdonald,et al.  Assessing online collaborative learning: process and product , 2003, Comput. Educ..

[28]  Yu-Hui Ching,et al.  Blogging in Higher Education: Issues, Challenges, and Design Considerations (D & D) , 2010 .

[29]  B. Wassell,et al.  Fostering Critical Engagement in Preservice Teachers: Incorporating Weblogs Into Multicultural Education , 2008 .

[30]  Jenny Waycott,et al.  Editorial 27(5): Preface to the Special issue- Assessing students' Web 2.0 activities in higher education , 2011 .

[31]  Nina Bonderup Dohn Web 2.0: Inherent tensions and evident challenges for education , 2009, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[32]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  The pedagogical challenges to collaborative technologies , 2009, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[33]  Nicole B. Ellison,et al.  Blogging in the Classroom: A Preliminary Exploration of Student Attitudes and Impact on Comprehension , 2008 .