‘Linked’ debrites in sand‐rich turbidite systems – origin and significance

Abstract The outer parts of a number of small Late Jurassic sandy deep‐water fans in the northern North Sea are dominated by the stacked deposits of co‐genetic sandy and muddy gravity flows. Sharp‐based, structureless and dewatered sandstone beds are directly overlain by mudclast breccias that are often rich in terrestrial plant fragments and capped by thin laminated sandstones, pseudonodular siltstones and mudstones. The contacts between the clast‐rich breccias and the underlying sandstones are typically highly irregular with evidence for liquefaction and upward sand injection. The breccias contain fragments (up to metre scale) of exotic lithologies surrounded by a matrix that is extremely heterogeneous and strewn with multiphase and variably sheared sand injections and scattered coarse and very coarse sand grains (often coarser than in the immediately underlying sand bed). Markov chain analysis establishes that the breccias consistently overlie sandstones, and the character of the breccias and their external contacts rule out a post‐depositional origin via in situ liquefaction, intrastratal flowage or bed amalgamation and disruption. The breccias are interpreted as debrites that rode on a water‐rich sand bed just deposited by a co‐genetic concentrated gravity current. As such, they are referred to as ‘linked debrites’ to distinguish them from debrites emplaced in the absence of a precursor sand bed. The distinction is important, because these linked debris flows can achieve significant mobility through entrainment of both water and sediment from beneath, and they ride on a low‐friction carpet of liquefied sand. This explains the paradox presented by fan fringes in which there are common debrites, when conventional thinking might predict that deposits of low‐concentration gravity currents should be more important here. In fact, evidence for transport by low‐concentration turbidity currents is rare in these systems. Several possible mechanisms might explain the formation of linked flows, but the ultimate source of both sandy and clast‐rich flow components must be in shallower water on the basin margin (the debrites are not triggered from distal slopes). Flow partitioning may have occurred by upslope erosion and retardation of the mudclast‐charged portion of an erosional sandy density current, partial flow transformation of a precursor debris flow and/or hydraulic segregation and reconcentration of the flaky clasts and carbonaceous matter during transport. Linked debrites are not restricted to small sand‐rich fans, and similar mechanisms may be responsible for the long runout of debris flows in other systems. The recognition of a distinct class of linked debrites is of wider importance for facies prediction, reservoir heterogeneity and even carbon fluxes and sequestration on continental margins.

[1]  J. Best,et al.  Turbulence Modulation in Clay-Rich Sediment-Laden Flows and Some Implications for Sediment Deposition , 2002 .

[2]  F. Legros Can Dispersive Pressure Cause Inverse Grading in Grain Flows , 2002 .

[3]  M. Kawamura,et al.  Sediment Flow and Deformation (SFD) Layers: Evidence for Intrastratal Flow in Laminated Muddy Sediments of the Triassic Osawa Formation, Northeast Japan , 2002 .

[4]  Jeffrey G. Marr,et al.  Experiments on subaqueous sandy gravity flows: The role of clay and water content in flow dynamics and depositional structures , 2001 .

[5]  R. Haszeldine,et al.  Evidence for reduced quartz-cementation rates in oil-filled sandstones , 2001 .

[6]  B. Kneller,et al.  Process controls on the development of stratigraphic trap potential on the margins of confined turbidite systems and aids to reservoir evaluation , 2001 .

[7]  J. Alexander,et al.  The physical character of subaqueous sedimentary density flows and their deposits , 2001 .

[8]  R. Macdonald,et al.  Exploring continental margin carbon fluxes on a global scale , 2000 .

[9]  G. Blackbourn,et al.  Britannia Field, UK North Sea: petrographic constraints on Lower Cretaceous provenance, facies and the origin of slurry-flow deposits , 2000, Petroleum Geoscience.

[10]  Y. Sohn Depositional Processes of Submarine Debris Flows in the Miocene Fan Deltas, Pohang Basin, SE Korea with Special Reference to Flow Transformation , 2000 .

[11]  D. Lowe,et al.  Slurry‐flow deposits in the Britannia Formation (Lower Cretaceous), North Sea: a new perspective on the turbidity current and debris flow problem , 2000 .

[12]  Ben Kneller,et al.  The structure and fluid mechanics of turbidity currents: a review of some recent studies and their geological implications , 2000 .

[13]  Parker Gary,et al.  Debris flows vs. turbidity currents; a modeling comparison of their dynamics and deposits , 2000 .

[14]  Allen,et al.  The Saharan debris flow: an insight into the mechanics of long runout submarine debris flows , 1999 .

[15]  F. Muller‐Karger,et al.  Increased marine sediment suspension and fluxes following an earthquake , 1999, Nature.

[16]  E. Leithold,et al.  Deposition and modification of a flood layer on the northern California shelf: lessons from and about the fate of terrestrial particulate organic carbon , 1999 .

[17]  R. King,et al.  Capturing reservoir heterogeneity in a sand-rich submarine fan, Miller Field , 1999 .

[18]  R. Marten,et al.  The first deepwater well in Norway and its implications for the Upper Cretaceous Play, Vøring Basin , 1999 .

[19]  R. Higgs Return of `The Fan That Never Was': Westphalian turbidite systems in the Variscan Culm Basin: Bude Formation (south‐west England) , 1998 .

[20]  R. Steel,et al.  Contrasting styles of Late Jurassic syn-rift turbidite sedimentation: a comparative study of the Magnus and Oseberg areas, northern North Sea , 1997 .

[21]  B. Hand Inverse Grading Resulting from Coarse-sediment Transport Lag , 1997 .

[22]  Neil H. Kenyon,et al.  Sediment mass-flow processes on a depositional lobe, outer Mississippi Fan , 1996 .

[23]  W. H. Graf,et al.  Flow structure in turbidity currents , 1996 .

[24]  Michael J. Branney,et al.  Sustained high‐density turbidity currents and the deposition of thick massive sands , 1995 .

[25]  Kelin X. Whipple,et al.  Hydroplaning of subaqueous debris flows , 1995 .

[26]  D. Stow,et al.  A classification scheme for shale clasts in deep water sandstones , 1995, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[27]  Marcelo Horacio Garcia,et al.  Depositional Turbidity Currents Laden with Poorly Sorted Sediment , 1994 .

[28]  M. Richards,et al.  Turbidite Systems in Deep-Water Basin Margins Classified by Grain Size and Feeder System , 1994 .

[29]  R. Hiscott Traction-Carpet Stratification in Turbidites-Fact or Fiction? , 1994 .

[30]  Marcelo Horacio Garcia,et al.  Experiments on the entrainment of sediment into suspension by a dense bottom current , 1993 .

[31]  C. Garland Miller Field: reservoir stratigraphy and its impact on development , 1993 .

[32]  A. Fraser,et al.  Genetic sequence stratigraphy for the North Sea Late Jurassic and Early Cretaceous: distribution and prediction of Kimmeridgian–Late Ryazanian reservoirs in the North Sea and adjacent areas , 1993 .

[33]  Homa J. Lee,et al.  Upper Pleistocene turbidite sand beds and chaotic silt beds in the channelized, distal, outer-fan lobes of the Mississippi fan , 1992 .

[34]  G. Ghibaudo Subaqueous sediment gravity flow deposits: practical criteria for their field description and classification , 1992 .

[35]  D. B. Prior,et al.  Flow properties of turbidity currents in Bute Inlet, British Columbia , 1991 .

[36]  D. Stow Deep Marine Environments: Clastic sedimentation and tectonics , 1991 .

[37]  A. Brown,et al.  Miller Field: A Subtle Upper Jurassic Submarine Fan Trap in the South Viking Graben, United Kingdom Sector, North Sea: Chapter 20 , 1990 .

[38]  L. Mayer,et al.  Giant flute-like scour and other erosional features formed by the 1929 Grand Banks turbidity current , 1990 .

[39]  A. Bowen,et al.  The vertical structure of turbidity currents and a necessary condition for self‐maintenance , 1988 .

[40]  Kevin T. Pickering,et al.  Contained (reflected) turbidity currents from the Middle Ordovician Cloridorme Formation, Quebec, Canada: an alternative to the antidune hypothesis , 1985 .

[41]  R. Berner Burial of organic carbon and pyrite sulfur in the modern ocean : its geochemical and environmental significance , 1982 .

[42]  D. Lowe Sediment Gravity Flows: II Depositional Models with Special Reference to the Deposits of High-Density Turbidity Currents , 1982 .

[43]  G. Shanmugam,et al.  Sequence of structures in fine-grained turbidites: Comparison of recent deep-sea and ancient flysch sediments , 1980 .

[44]  M. Hampton,et al.  The Role of Subaqueous Debris Flow in Generating Turbidity Currents , 1972 .

[45]  M. A. Hampton Transport of Ocean Sediments by Debris Flow: ABSTRACT , 1972 .

[46]  A. Smith,et al.  Two undescribed structures in a greywacke series , 1958 .

[47]  Alec J. Smith,et al.  THE SEDIMENTATION AND SEDIMENTARY HISTORY OF THE ABERYSTWYTH GRITS (UPPER LLANDOVERIAN) , 1958, Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London.