The effects of flute shape and thread profile on the insertion torque and primary stability of dental implants.

Easy insertion of the implant and stable bone purchase is essential for an ideal dental implantation. At the implant tip, the cutting flutes and conical profile are respectively designed to reduce insertion resistance and facilitate the initial insertion. However, the tapered tip might reduce the self-tapping and bone-purchasing abilities of the flutes and the tip threads. Using sawbone blocks as standard specimens, this study experimentally measures the insertion torque, holding power, and bending strength of eight varieties of implant (4 shapes×2 profiles). The bony contact, interfacial mechanism, and the altered shape of the flutes, at different section planes, are used to explain the experimental results. The results reveal that the bone-implant gaps at the tip region significantly suppress both the self-tapping and bone-purchasing abilities of the flutes and the tip threads. This makes initial insertion of the conical implant easier. However, the conical implant eventually requires a higher insertion torque and holding power, due to tighter bony contact, at the tail threads. The bowl-fluted design has the least flute space to store the squeezed bone chips, so both insertion torque and bending strength are significantly higher. For the conical group, the holding powers of three flute designs are nearly comparable. Overall, the conical implant with bowl flutes is the optimal design, with a lower resistance to initial insertion and higher stability, for final instrumentation.

[1]  B. Al-Nawas,et al.  Primary stability of a hybrid self-tapping implant compared to a cylindrical non-self-tapping implant with respect to drilling protocols in an ex vivo model. , 2011, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[2]  J Cordey,et al.  AO/ASIF self-tapping screws (STS). , 1993, Injury.

[3]  L Sennerby,et al.  Measurements comparing the initial stability of five designs of dental implants: a human cadaver study. , 2000, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[4]  M. Pope,et al.  Correlation of bone equivalent mineral density to pull-out resistance of triangulated pedicle screw construct. , 1997, Journal of spinal disorders.

[5]  T. Ryken,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of bone mineral density, insertion technique, screw torque, and holding strength of anterior cervical plate screws. , 1995, Journal of neurosurgery.

[6]  I. Turkyilmaz,et al.  Biomechanical aspects of primary implant stability: a human cadaver study. , 2009, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[7]  M. Bickley,et al.  Self-tapping versus standard tapped titanium screw fixation in the upper extremity. , 1998, The Journal of hand surgery.

[8]  P. Apse,et al.  Investigation of Initial Implant Stability with Different Dental Implant Designs. A Pilot Study in Pig Ribs Using Resonance Frequency Analysis , 2004 .

[9]  J B Brunski,et al.  Biomechanical factors affecting the bone-dental implant interface. , 1992, Clinical materials.

[10]  J Koebke,et al.  Biomechanical comparison of four different miniscrew types for skeletal anchorage in the mandibulo-maxillary area. , 2008, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[11]  Chung-Ju Hwang,et al.  Insertion torque of orthodontic miniscrews according to changes in shape, diameter and length. , 2008, The Angle orthodontist.

[12]  C. Chao,et al.  Increase of pullout strength of spinal pedicle screws with conical core: Biomechanical tests and finite element analyses , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[13]  B. Al-Nawas,et al.  Primary stability of a conical implant and a hybrid, cylindric screw-type implant in vitro. , 2006, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[14]  A. Schmidt-Westhausen,et al.  Clinical study on the primary stability of two dental implant systems with resonance frequency analysis , 2007, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[15]  I. Turkyilmaz,et al.  Two alternative surgical techniques for enhancing primary implant stability in the posterior maxilla: a clinical study including bone density, insertion torque, and resonance frequency analysis data. , 2008, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[16]  Mihoko Atsumi,et al.  Methods used to assess implant stability: current status. , 2007, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[17]  D Buser,et al.  Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a histometric study in the canine mandible. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[18]  F. Carinci,et al.  Evaluation of factors influencing resonance frequency analysis values, at insertion surgery, of implants placed in sinus-augmented and nongrafted sites. , 2007, Clinical implant dentistry and related research.

[19]  S. Cook,et al.  Effects of Bone Mineral Density on Pedicle Screw Fixation , 1994, Spine.

[20]  S. Baek,et al.  Comparison of stability between cylindrical and conical type mini-implants. Mechanical and histological properties. , 2008, The Angle orthodontist.

[21]  N Meredith,et al.  Assessment of implant stability as a prognostic determinant. , 1998, The International journal of prosthodontics.

[22]  J. Torner,et al.  Factors Affecting the Pullout Strength of Self-Drilling and Self-Tapping Anterior Cervical Screws , 2003, Spine.