Variational phase-field continuum model uncovers adhesive wear mechanisms in asperity junctions

Abstract Wear is well known for causing material loss in a sliding interface. Available macroscopic approaches are bound to empirical fitting parameters, which range several orders of magnitude. Major advances in tribology have recently been achieved via Molecular Dynamics, although its use is strongly limited by computational cost. Here, we propose a study of the physical processes that lead to wear at the scale of the surface roughness, where adhesive junctions are formed between the asperities on the surface of the materials. Using a brittle formulation of the variational phase-field approach to fracture, we demonstrate that the failure mechanisms of an adhesive junction can be linked to its geometry. By imposing specific couplings between the damage and the elastic energy, we further investigate the triggering processes underlying each failure mechanism. We show that a large debris formation is mostly triggered by tensile stresses while shear stresses lead to small or no particle formation. We also study groups of junctions and discuss how microcontact interactions can be favored in some geometries to form macro-particles. This leads us to propose a classification in terms of macroscopic wear rate. Although based on a continuum approach, our phase-field calculations are able to effectively capture the failure of adhesive junctions, as observed through discrete Molecular Dynamics simulations.

[1]  Gilles A. Francfort,et al.  Revisiting brittle fracture as an energy minimization problem , 1998 .

[2]  E. Rabinowicz,et al.  Friction and Wear of Materials , 1966 .

[3]  J. Molinari,et al.  Emergence of self-affine surfaces during adhesive wear , 2019, Nature Communications.

[4]  J. Molinari,et al.  Adhesive wear mechanisms in the presence of weak interfaces: Insights from an amorphous model system , 2019, Physical Review Materials.

[5]  K. Hokkirigawa,et al.  The transitions between microscopic wear modes during repeated sliding friction observed by a scanning electron microscope tribosystem , 1990 .

[6]  K. Ludema,et al.  Wear models and predictive equations: their form and content , 1995 .

[7]  Jean-Jacques Marigo,et al.  Morphogenesis and propagation of complex cracks induced by thermal shocks , 2013 .

[8]  M. Paggi,et al.  The steady-state Archard adhesive wear problem revisited based on the phase field approach to fracture , 2018, International Journal of Fracture.

[9]  H. P. Van De Braak,et al.  Electrical Contacts , 1961, Nature.

[10]  G. Martini,et al.  Brake wear particle emissions: a review , 2014, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[11]  E. Rabinowicz The effect of size on the looseness of wear fragments , 1958 .

[12]  B. Bourdin,et al.  The Variational Approach to Fracture , 2008 .

[13]  Danna Zhou,et al.  d. , 1934, Microbial pathogenesis.

[14]  K. Hokkirigawa Wear mode map of ceramics , 1991 .

[15]  A model junction study of severe metallic wear , 1965 .

[16]  W. Marsden I and J , 2012 .

[17]  R. Burnett,et al.  Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. , 2002, JAMA.

[18]  Koshi Adachi,et al.  Wear of advanced ceramics , 2002 .

[19]  S. M. Hsu,et al.  Wear and wear transition modeling of ceramics , 1996 .

[20]  J. Archard Contact and Rubbing of Flat Surfaces , 1953 .

[21]  Giovanni Lancioni,et al.  The Variational Approach to Fracture Mechanics. A Practical Application to the French Panthéon in Paris , 2009 .

[22]  J. Molinari,et al.  Critical length scale controls adhesive wear mechanisms , 2016, Nature Communications.

[23]  B. Bourdin,et al.  Numerical experiments in revisited brittle fracture , 2000 .

[24]  J. Archard,et al.  The wear of metals under unlubricated conditions , 1956, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[25]  J. Molinari,et al.  Asperity-Level Origins of Transition from Mild to Severe Wear. , 2018, Physical review letters.

[26]  J. Sarnat,et al.  Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in 20 U.S. cities. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  Ulf Olofsson,et al.  A study of airborne wear particles generated from the train traffic-Block braking simulation in a pin-on-disc machine , 2011 .

[28]  F. Dominici,et al.  Fine particulate air pollution and mortality in 20 U.S. cities, 1987-1994. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  J. Molinari,et al.  Adhesive wear and interaction of tangentially loaded micro-contacts , 2019, International Journal of Solids and Structures.

[30]  Y. Drozdov,et al.  WEAR PREDICTION OF CERAMICS , 2006 .

[31]  Laura De Lorenzis,et al.  A review on phase-field models of brittle fracture and a new fast hybrid formulation , 2015 .

[32]  Jean-François Molinari,et al.  A mechanistic understanding of the wear coefficient: From single to multiple asperities contact , 2018 .

[33]  Jean-Jacques Marigo,et al.  Crack nucleation in variational phase-field models of brittle fracture , 2018 .

[34]  H. Hansen,et al.  Lung cancer. , 1990, Cancer chemotherapy and biological response modifiers.

[35]  J. Molinari,et al.  On the debris-level origins of adhesive wear , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Jean-Jacques Marigo,et al.  Regularized formulation of the variational brittle fracture with unilateral contact: Numerical experiments , 2009 .