Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., previously infected with Neoparamoeba sp. are not resistant to re-infection and have suppressed phagocyte function.

Previous studies have indicated that Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., affected by amoebic gill disease (AGD) are resistant to re-infection. These observations were based upon a comparison of gross gill lesion abundance between previously infected and naïve control fish. Anecdotal evidence from Atlantic salmon farms in southern Tasmania suggests that previous infection does not protect against AGD as indicated by a lack of temporal change in freshwater bathing intervals. Experiments were conducted to determine if previous infection of Atlantic salmon with Neoparamoeba sp. would provide protection against challenge and elucidate the immunological basis of any protection. Atlantic salmon were infected with Neoparamoeba sp. for 12 days then treated with a 4-h freshwater bath. Fish were separated into two groups and maintained in either sea water or fresh water for 6 weeks. Fish were then transferred to one tank with a naïve control group and challenged with Neoparamoeba sp. Fish kept in sea water had lower mortality rates compared with first time exposed and freshwater maintained fish, however, these data are believed to be biased by ongoing mortalities during the sea-water maintenance phase. Phagocyte function decreased over exposure time and freshwater maintained fish demonstrated an increased ability to mount a specific immune response. These results suggest that under the challenge conditions herein described, antigen exposure via infection does not induce protection to subsequent AGD.

[1]  D. Steinhagen,et al.  The haemoflagellate Trypanoplasma borreli induces the production of nitric oxide, which is associated with modulation of carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) leucocyte functions. , 2003, Fish & shellfish immunology.

[2]  Patrick T.K. Woo,et al.  Experimental Cryptobia salmositica (Kinetoplastida) infections in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L.: cell‐mediated and humoral immune responses against the pathogenic and vaccine strains of the parasite , 2002 .

[3]  S. Chilmonczyk,et al.  Proliferative kidney disease: cellular aspects of the rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum), response to parasitic infection , 2002 .

[4]  B. Munday,et al.  Gill disease of marine fish caused by infection with Neoparamoeba pemaquidensis , 2001 .

[5]  B. Munday,et al.  The effect of anti-Paramoeba antibodies on Paramoeba sp., the causative agent of amoebic gill disease , 2001 .

[6]  Munday,et al.  Responses of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., to Paramoeba antigens administered by a variety of routes , 2001 .

[7]  B. Munday,et al.  Production of salmonid amoebic gill disease by exposure to Paramoeba sp. harvested from the gills of infected fish , 2001 .

[8]  J. Sperry,et al.  An in vitro assay to measure phagocytosis in striped bass hybrids (Morone saxatilis x Morone chrysops). , 2000, Fish & shellfish immunology.

[9]  B. Munday,et al.  Evaluation of levamisole as a treatment for amoebic gill disease of Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. , 2000 .

[10]  B. Nowak,et al.  Field investigations of amoebic gill disease in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., in Tasmania , 1999 .

[11]  Shih‐Chu Chen,et al.  The immune response of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) againstAphanomyces invadans , 1999 .

[12]  Findlay,et al.  Further studies on acquired resistance to amoebic gill disease (AGD) in Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. , 1998, Journal of fish diseases.

[13]  B. Munday,et al.  Immunological aspects of amoebic gill disease in salmonids , 1996 .

[14]  B. Munday,et al.  Demonstration of resistance to reinfection with Paramoeba sp. by Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L. , 1995 .

[15]  P. Youinou,et al.  Lower immune response induced by PKD , 1987 .

[16]  A. Mustafa,et al.  Effects of sea lice (Lepeophtheirus salmonis Kröyer, 1837) infestation on macrophage functions in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). , 2000, Fish & shellfish immunology.