No pause for a brief disruption: Failures of visual awareness during ongoing events

Past research has repeatedly documented the close relationship between visual attention and awareness. Most recently, research exploring change blindness, inattentional blindness, repetition blindness, and the attentional blink has converged on the conclusion that attention to one aspect of a scene or event may lead to a highly circumscribed awareness of only the specific information attended, while other information, even that which is spatially or temporally nearby can go completely unnoticed. In the present report, we extend these observations to the dynamic allocation of attention during a well-structured meaningful event. In two experiments, subjects viewed brief videos of simple events and were told to pay close attention to them. During the events, an unexpected disruption consisting of a brief low spatial frequency motion field occurred. Despite intensive questioning and opportunities for recognition, the majority of subjects reported no awareness of 200, 400, or 600 ms disruptions. In a second experiment, blank-screen disruptions were added, and these resulted in no increase in detection. We conclude that visual attention may result in far more transitory awareness of visual information than previously appreciated.

[1]  E. Bizzi,et al.  The Cognitive Neurosciences , 1996 .

[2]  N. P. Bichot,et al.  Visuospatial attention: Beyond a spotlight model , 1999, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  V. Lamme Why visual attention and awareness are different , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  D. Levin Thinking and seeing : visual metacognition in adults and children , 2004 .

[5]  M. Potter,et al.  A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  Zoning Out while Reading: Evidence for Dissociations between Experience and Metaconsciousness. , 2004 .

[7]  Steven C.R. Williams,et al.  Implications of synaesthesia for functionalism - Theory and experiments , 2002 .

[8]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  Daniel T. Levin,et al.  Perceiving Stability in a Changing World: Combining Shots and Intergrating Views in Motion Pictures and the Real World , 2000 .

[10]  D. Simons,et al.  Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction , 1998 .

[11]  D. Simons,et al.  Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures , 1997 .

[12]  Cathleen M. Moore,et al.  Inattentional Blindness: Perception or Memory and What Does It Matter? , 2001 .

[13]  W. Starbuck,et al.  Level of aspiration. , 1963, Psychological review.

[14]  J. Deutsch,et al.  Attention: Some theoretical considerations. , 1963 .

[15]  A. Mack Inattentional Blindness , 2003 .

[16]  Darren Newtson,et al.  The perceptual organization of ongoing behavior , 1976 .

[17]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Event structure in perception and conception. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[18]  L. Pessoa,et al.  Beyond the Grand Illusion: What Change Blindness Really Teaches Us About Vision , 2000 .

[19]  J. O'Regan,et al.  Solving the "real" mysteries of visual perception: the world as an outside memory. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.